PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) reinjection on clinical and optical coherence tomographic features in refractory diabetic macular edema. METHODS: In a prospective interventional case series, all IVT treated patients enrolled in a previous clinical trial were recalled to have a new ophthalmologic examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed. Eyes found suitable for reinjection received 4 mg IVT. Complete clinical examination and OCT were repeated at 2 and 4 months post-injection. The changes were statistically analyzed using a paired t test and were compared to the results of the first injections. RESULTS: Of all returning patients, 12 cases with complete records were considered candidates for reinjection. Visual acuity (VA) changes were not significant after the first and second interventions, although there was a relative improvement (0.14 logMAR) 2 months after the first injection. Reductions of central macular thickness (CMT) were 43+/-69 micrometer, and 40+/-69 micrometer after the first injection and 27+/-48 micrometer, 49+/-58 micrometer after the reinjection at 2 and 4 months, respectively. None of the mentioned changes was significant. After the second injection, however, intraocular pressure was elevated at both 2 and 4 months (3.6 and 2.4 mmHg respectively, P<0.05). Two months after the first administration, intraocular pressure was found to be raised significantly (5.58 mmHg, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The transient beneficial effects of IVT on diabetic macular edema are not repeated with second injections. However, IVT-related ocular hypertension is more persistent after reinjection.
Vitreous Body ; Visual Acuity ; Triamcinolone/*administration & dosage ; Treatment Outcome ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Time Factors ; Retreatment ; Prospective Studies ; Male ; Macular Edema, Cystoid/*drug therapy/etiology/pathology ; Intraocular Pressure ; Injections ; Humans ; Glucocorticoids/*administration & dosage ; Follow-Up Studies ; Female ; Diabetic Retinopathy/*complications/pathology

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term effects of intravitreal versus posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema. METHODS: This is a prospective and interventional study. Sixty eyes of 60 patients who had diffuse diabetic macular edema were assigned to receive a single intravitreal injection (4 mg) or a single posterior subtenon injection (40 mg) of triamcinolone acetonide. The central retinal thickness was measured using optical coherent tomography before injection and at 1 and 3 months after injection. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were also measured. RESULTS: Both intravitreal and posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide resulted in significant improvements in visual acuity at 1 month and 3 months after injection. Both groups resulted in a significant decrease in central macular thickness (CMT) at 1 month and 3 months post-injection. IOP in the intravitreal injection group was significantly higher than in the posterior subtenon injection group at 3 months after injection. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide had a comparable effect to the intravitreal triamcinolone injection and showed a lower risk of elevated IOP. Posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide may be a good alternative for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema.
Vitreous Body ; Visual Acuity ; Triamcinolone Acetonide/*administration & dosage/therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Prospective Studies ; Orbit ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Macular Edema, Cystoid/*drug therapy/etiology/pathology ; Injections ; Humans ; Glucocorticoids/*administration & dosage/therapeutic use ; Fundus Oculi ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Female ; Diabetic Retinopathy/*complications/pathology ; Aged