1.Risk factors associated with prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage of SARS-CoV-2 and length of stay among patients admitted to a COVID-19 referral center in Manila, Philippines
Ma. Sergia Fatima P. Sucaldito ; Bea Regine C. Panganiban ; Cecilia A. Jimeno
Acta Medica Philippina 2023;57(12):66-72
Objective:
Prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage of SARS-CoV-2 has been linked to prolonged hospital stay and delayed radiologic recovery. To determine if clinical risk factors are associated with prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage or longer hospital stay, we performed a descriptive analysis of 169 moderate to severe COVID-19 patients admitted at the Philippine General Hospital from March to June 2020.
Methods:
Length of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR positivity and clinical demographic data were extracted from existing patient records. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and regression analysis were performed to describe the association of clinical risk factors with prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage and length of hospital stay.
Results:
The median duration of carriage was 19 days (IQR 12.0-30.0 days). No comorbidities or inflammatory
markers had a statistically significant association with prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage defined as >24 days of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR positivity. Characteristics associated with a statistically significant longer hospital stay included chronic kidney disease stages 3-5, severe disease, and use of empiric antibiotics on admission. Prolonged carriage >24 days, hsCRP, and D-dimer at admission, also had a statistically significant but weak correlation with length of stay.
Conclusion
Among patients with moderate disease, comorbidities and inflammatory markers were not associated with prolonged COVID-19 nasopharyngeal carriage. Prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage >24 days was associated with longer hospital stay, while D-dimer and hsCRP levels at admission, also had statistically significant but small effects on increasing the hospital length of stay.
COVID-19
;
Length of Stay
2.Risk factors associated with prolonged Nasopharyngeal carriage of SARS-CoV-2 and length of stay among patients admitted to a COVID-19 referral center in Manila, Philippines
Ma. Sergia Fatima P. Sucaldito ; Bea Regine C. Panganiban ; Cecilia A. Jimeno
Acta Medica Philippina 2020;54(Online):1-7
Objective:
Prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage of SARS-CoV-2 has been linked to prolonged hospital stay and delayed radiologic recovery. To determine if clinical risk factors are associated with prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage or longer hospital stay, we performed a descriptive analysis of 169 moderate to severe COVID-19 patients admitted at the Philippine General Hospital from March to June 2020.
Methods:
Length of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR positivity and clinical demographic data were extracted from existing patient records. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and regression analysis were performed to describe the association of clinical risk factors with prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage and length of hospital stay.
Results:
The median duration of carriage was 19 days (IQR 12.0-30.0 days). No comorbidities or inflammatory
markers had a statistically significant association with prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage defined as >24 days of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR positivity. Characteristics associated with a statistically significant longer hospital stay included chronic kidney disease stages 3-5, severe disease, and use of empiric antibiotics on admission. Prolonged carriage >24 days, hsCRP, and D-dimer at admission, also had a statistically significant but weak correlation with length of stay.
Conclusion
Among patients with moderate disease, comorbidities and inflammatory markers were not associated with prolonged COVID-19 nasopharyngeal carriage. Prolonged nasopharyngeal carriage >24 days was associated with longer hospital stay, while D-dimer and hsCRP levels at admission, also had statistically significant but small effects on increasing the hospital length of stay
COVID-19
;
Length of Stay
3.Clinical features of Senior–Loken syndrome with IQCB1/NPHP5 mutation in a Filipino man
Harold Henrison C. CHIU ; Ma. Sergia Fatima P. SUCALDITO ; Ebner Bon G. MACEDA ; Jan Andrei S. MONTEMAOR ; Diana R. TAMONDONG-LACHICA
Journal of Genetic Medicine 2020;17(1):39-42
The Senior–Loken syndrome was first described in 1961 as an oculo-renal disease consisting of familial juvenile nephronophthisis and Leber congenital amaurosis. It is a rare autosomal recessive disorder with a prevalence of 1:1,000,000 caused by mutations in nine genes (NPHP 1-8 and NPHP 10). Ocular manifestations (e.g., photophobia, nystagmus, and extreme hyperopia) occur within the first few years of life while renal manifestations (e.g., formation of multiple cysts impairing kidney function and end-stage renal disease) appear in late childhood to adolescence. Here, we report a case of a Filipino male presenting with rotatory nystagmus and progressive deterioration of vision since childhood. He had congenital amaurosis and juvenile nephronophthisis that progressed to end stage renal disease by age 19. All laboratory and imaging findings were consistent with chronic kidney disease. Molecular genetic testing of ciliopathy-related genes was performed revealing a homozygous mutation in exon 11 of the IQCB1/NPHP5 gene, c.1090C>T (p.Arg364*). This sequence change created a premature translational stop signal resulting in a truncated protein product, nephrocystin-5 and its consequent loss of function. His symptoms eventually improved with initiation dialysis. The prognosis of Senior–Loken syndrome remains dismal and a high index of suspicion, early diagnosis and timely intervention of renal complications are warranted.
4.The diagnostic performance of nuchal translucency alone as a screening test for Down syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma. Sergia Fatima P. SUCALDITO ; John Jefferson V. BESA ; Lia M. PALILEO-VILLANUEVA
Acta Medica Philippina 2025;59(Early Access 2025):1-17
BACKGROUND<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">Down syndrome or trisomy 21, the most common chromosomal disorder, results from the presence of a third copy of chromosome 21 and manifests as mild to moderate intellectual disability, growth retardation, congenital heart defects, gastrointestinal abnormalities, and characteristic facial features. Several methods have been used to screen for Down syndrome in the prenatal period, such as ultrasound, biomarkers, cell-free DNA testing, and combinations of these tests. A positive result from one or more of these screening tests signals the need for confirmatory karyotyping to clinch the diagnosis. Ultrasound between 11 to 14 weeks of gestation can evaluate nuchal translucency (NT) to screen for Down syndrome. During the second trimester, a triple or quadruple test can also be performed alone or in addition to NT to quantify Down syndrome risk. In limited resource settings however, only the measurement of NT via ultrasound can be performed since biomarker tests are either unavailable or inaccessible. While the diagnostic performance of NT measurement alone has been investigated in several observational studies, there is no consensus on its performance as a sole test to screen for Down syndrome.p>OBJECTIVE<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">To determine the diagnostic performance of NT during prenatal first-trimester ultrasound as a screening test for Down syndrome.p>METHODS<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">We performed a systematic search on the PubMed, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library databases for recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses that addressed the objective. The existing reviews found were then independently appraised by the two reviewers with the AMSTAR-2 checklist. To update the existing reviews, a systematic search was done in the same databases to identify additional primary diagnostic studies, which were appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects univariate meta-analysis and summary receiving operator curve (HSROC) analysis for the outcomes were performed using Review Manager version 5.4 and R version 4.2.2, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying the baseline risk of mothers for fetal anomaly as low- or high-risk. Highrisk mothers were defined as women with risk factors such as advanced age, positive serum screen, presence of other ultrasound anomalies, and history of previous fetus with anomaly.p>RESULTS<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">We found 22 cohort studies (n=225,846) of women at low-risk for fetal anomaly. The pooled sensitivity was 67.8% (95% CI: 61.4%-73.6%, I2=70.4%) and specificity was 96.3% (95% CI: 95.5%-96.9%, I2=96.7%). For low-risk women, the overall certainty of evidence was low, due to different modes of verification and heterogeneity not completely explained by variability in baseline risk or cut-points. Seven studies (n=9,197) were on high-risk women. The pooled sensitivity was 62.2% (95% CI: 54.1%-69.7%, I2=38.8%) and specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 93.6%-98.1%, I2=95.5%). For women at high-risk, the evidence was rated as moderate due to differential verification.p>CONCLUSION<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">Our analysis showed that NT measured through first-trimester ultrasound is specific for Down syndrome but has low sensitivity. Despite this, it is a useful screening test for Down syndrome in low-resource settings where other strategies may not be available or accessible. Furthermore, interpretation of NT results must take into consideration its limited sensitivity as this may lead to missed cases.p>
Human
;
Nuchal Translucency Measurement
;
Down Syndrome
;
Sensitivity And Specificity