1.Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism disease at 30 days than primary total knee arthroplasty
Andrew M. SCHNEIDER ; Daniel R. SCHMITT ; Nicholas M. BROWN
The Journal of Korean Knee Society 2020;32(4):e59-
Background:
While multiple studies have demonstrated a lower venous thromboembolism disease (VTED) risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared to primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), recent reports have shown that revision TKA also had a lower VTED risk compared to primary TKA, an unexpected finding because of its theoretical increased risk. Given the paucity of up-to-date comparative studies, our goal was to perform a highpowered VTED risk comparison study of UKA and revision TKA to primary TKA using recent data.
Methods:
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried between 2011 and 2018, and we identified 213,234 patients for inclusion: 191,810 primary TKA, 9294 UKA, and 12,130 revision TKA.Demographics, medical comorbidities, and possible VTE risk factors were collected. Thirty-day outcomes, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause VTED were compared between knee arthroplasty types.
Results:
On multivariate analysis, UKA was significantly associated with lower rates of DVT [OR 0.44 (0.31–0.61); P < 0.001], PE [OR 0.42 (0.28–0.65); P < 0.001], and all-cause VTED [OR 0.42 (0.32–0.55); P < 0.001] when compared to primary TKA. Revision TKA was significantly associated with lower rates of PE [OR 0.62 (0.47–0.83); P = 0.002], and allcause VTED [OR 0.82 (0.70–0.98); P = 0.029] when compared to primary TKA.
Conclusions
Utilizing recent data from a nationwide patient cohort and controlling for confounding variables, our results showed that both revision TKA and UKA had a lower risk of VTED compared to primary TKA, corroborating the results of recent investigations. Additional prospective investigations are needed to explain this unexpected result.
2.Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism disease at 30 days than primary total knee arthroplasty
Andrew M. SCHNEIDER ; Daniel R. SCHMITT ; Nicholas M. BROWN
The Journal of Korean Knee Society 2020;32(4):e59-
Background:
While multiple studies have demonstrated a lower venous thromboembolism disease (VTED) risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared to primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), recent reports have shown that revision TKA also had a lower VTED risk compared to primary TKA, an unexpected finding because of its theoretical increased risk. Given the paucity of up-to-date comparative studies, our goal was to perform a highpowered VTED risk comparison study of UKA and revision TKA to primary TKA using recent data.
Methods:
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried between 2011 and 2018, and we identified 213,234 patients for inclusion: 191,810 primary TKA, 9294 UKA, and 12,130 revision TKA.Demographics, medical comorbidities, and possible VTE risk factors were collected. Thirty-day outcomes, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause VTED were compared between knee arthroplasty types.
Results:
On multivariate analysis, UKA was significantly associated with lower rates of DVT [OR 0.44 (0.31–0.61); P < 0.001], PE [OR 0.42 (0.28–0.65); P < 0.001], and all-cause VTED [OR 0.42 (0.32–0.55); P < 0.001] when compared to primary TKA. Revision TKA was significantly associated with lower rates of PE [OR 0.62 (0.47–0.83); P = 0.002], and allcause VTED [OR 0.82 (0.70–0.98); P = 0.029] when compared to primary TKA.
Conclusions
Utilizing recent data from a nationwide patient cohort and controlling for confounding variables, our results showed that both revision TKA and UKA had a lower risk of VTED compared to primary TKA, corroborating the results of recent investigations. Additional prospective investigations are needed to explain this unexpected result.
3.Evaluation of the Cost Effectiveness of Routine Histopathologic Femoral Head Analysis in Hip Arthroplasty
Zoe BROWN ; Michael PERRY ; Cameron KILLEN ; Daniel SCHMITT ; Michael WESOLOWSKI ; Nicholas M. BROWN
Hip & Pelvis 2022;34(1):56-61
Purpose:
Histopathologic analysis of femoral head specimens following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a routine practice that represents a significant use of health care resources. However, it occasionally results in discovery of undiagnosed hematopoietic malignancy and other discrepant diagnoses such as avascular necrosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of discordant and discrepant diagnoses discovered from routine histopathological evaluation of femoral heads following THA and perform a cost analysis of this practice.
Materials and Methods:
A review of patients undergoing primary THA between 2004-2017 was conducted. A comparison of the surgeon’s preoperative and postoperative diagnosis, and the histopathologic diagnosis was performed. In cases where the clinical and histopathology differed, a review determined whether this resulted in a change in clinical management. Medicare reimbursement and previously published cost data corrected for inflation were utilized for cost calculations.
Results:
A review of 2,134 procedures was performed. The pathologic diagnosis matched the postoperative diagnosis in 96.0% of cases. Eighty-three cases (4.0%) had a discrepant diagnosis where treatment was not substantially altered. There was one case of discordant diagnosis where lymphoma was diagnosed and subsequently treated. The cost per discrepant diagnosis was $141,880 and per discordant diagnosis was $1,669 when using 100% Medicare reimbursement and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code combination 88304+88311.
Conclusion
Histopathologic analysis of femoral head specimens in THAs showed an association with high costs given the rarity of discordant diagnoses. Routine use of the practice should be at the discretion of individual hospitals with consideration for cost and utility thresholds.
4.Effect of recipient mouse splenocytes taken orally by donor mouse on GVHD after splenocyte transplantation.
Bao-An CHEN ; Xiao-Jing DENG ; Jia-Hua DING ; Xue-Mei SUN ; Wei-Min DONG ; Yan-Zhi BI ; Yan ZHANG ; Gang ZHAO ; Chong GAO ; Yun-Yu SUN ; Jun WANG ; Jian CHENG ; Yan MA ; Hui-Hui SONG ; Wen BAO ; A SCHMITT ; M SCHMITT
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2008;16(1):126-130
This study was aimed to explore whether the GVHD in mice can be ameliorated and the GVL effect in mice can be reserved by transfusion of lymphocytes of donors fed with recipient splenocytes effect. Male (DBA-2) mice (H-2(d)) as donors were fed with BALB/c splenocytes, DBA-2 splenocytes, bovine serum albumin, or regular chow, every other day. Induction of tolerance was assessed by a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). Female (BALB/c) mice (H-2(d)) as recipients received total body irradiation (TBI) of 6.0 Gy ((60)Cogamma-ray) followed by inoculation of 3 x 10(3) P388 mouse leukemia cells on the same day. Subsequently, tail vein injection of 2 x 10(7) splenocytes supplied by DBA-2 was undertaken. Control groups were fed identically without leukemia cell inoculation. The results showed that GVHD was significantly ameliorated and CD4(+)/CD8(+) ratio increased in recipient-mice transplanted with splenocytes of tolerated donors, compared with control animals. There was no significant difference in survival rate between different groups of recipients inoculated with leukemia cell. It is concluded that the peroral recipient-mouse splenocytes can ameliorate GVHD without hampering effect on GVL.
Adjuvants, Immunologic
;
pharmacology
;
Animals
;
Cell Extracts
;
immunology
;
pharmacology
;
Cell Transplantation
;
Female
;
Graft vs Host Disease
;
immunology
;
prevention & control
;
Graft vs Leukemia Effect
;
immunology
;
Leukemia P388
;
therapy
;
Lymphocytes
;
immunology
;
Male
;
Mice
;
Mice, Inbred BALB C
;
Mice, Inbred DBA
;
Spleen
;
cytology
;
immunology
;
Whole-Body Irradiation
5.Selective elimination of alloreactive donor lymphocytes by using TBI and cyclophosphamide.
Bao-An CHEN ; Wei-Min DONG ; Jia-Hua DING ; Xue-Mei SUN ; Xiao-Jing DENG ; Yan ZHANG ; Yan-Zhi BI ; Gang ZHAO ; Chong GAO ; Yun-Yu SUN ; Jun WANG ; Jian CHENG ; M SCHMITT ; A SCHMITT
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2007;15(2):332-336
This study was aimed to investigate a new method of avoiding graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) through selective elimination of alloreactive donor lymphocytes by using total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide (Cy). Female (BALB/c x C57BL/6) F1 mice (H-2(d/b)) as recipients received (60)Co gamma-ray sublethal TBI of 4 Gy on day 0 followed by being inoculated with P388D1 leukemia cell line on day 1, injection of allogeneic splenocytes from C57BL/6 male mice (H-2(b)) was carried out for induction of graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) effect prior to stem cell transplantation (SCT), intraperitoneally injection of cyclophosphamide (Cy) (200 mg/kg) and TBI (9 Gy) was given on day 6. One day later, treated mice were rescued with bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells from (BALB/c x C57BL/6) F1 male mice (H-2(d/b)). The results showed that recipients had no occurrence of leukemia and GVHD through selective elimination of alloreactive donor lymphocytes by Cy and TBI, survived more than 210 days, the complete-donor chimerism occurred on day 21 after transplantation. The ratio of chimerism descended subsequently, but still displayed mixed-chimerism at 90 days. Control mice died of GVHD, leukemia or other death-related-transplantation within 20 to 36 days (P<0.01). It is concluded that to induce GVL effects by MHC mismatched splenocytes given before syngeneic bone marrow transplantation followed by selective elimination of alloreactive donor lymphocytes through TBI and Cy, graft-vs-host disease was thus avoided.
Animals
;
Cyclophosphamide
;
therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Graft vs Host Disease
;
prevention & control
;
Graft vs Tumor Effect
;
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
;
adverse effects
;
Leukemia P388
;
therapy
;
Lymphocyte Depletion
;
Lymphocytes
;
immunology
;
Male
;
Mice
;
Mice, Inbred BALB C
;
Mice, Inbred C57BL
;
Whole-Body Irradiation