2.The Argument and Consensus of Lymphadenectomy on Lung Cancer Surgery.
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2018;21(3):176-179
Lymph node metastasis is an important route of metastasis of lung cancer. Lymphadenectomy has become the standard surgical procedure for lung cancer. The way of intraoperative lymph node assessment also affects the prognosis and treatment strategy of lung cancer. In clinical practice, the way of intraoperative lymph node assessment ranges from selected lymph node biopsy to extended lymph node dissection. The advantages and disadvantages of different lymph node assessment are still controversial. In this article, the argument and consensus of lymphadenectomy on lung cancer operation are summarized.
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
pathology
;
surgery
;
Lymph Node Excision
;
Lymph Nodes
;
pathology
;
surgery
;
Lymphatic Metastasis
;
Neoplasm Staging
3.Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection for early distal gastric cancer: a meta-analysis on the number of retrieved lymph nodes.
Na YANG ; Chang-ming HUANG ; Tao LIN ; Chao-hui ZHENG ; Ping LI ; Jian-wei XIE ; Bi-juan LIN ; Hui-shan LU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2010;13(2):97-102
OBJECTIVETo compare the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LN) between laparoscopic resection and conventional open resection for early distal gastric cancer with meta-analysis.
METHODSOriginal articles published from January 2000 to December 2008 were searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. According to the criterion, 14 articles were identified which compared the number of retrieved lymph nodes between laparoscopic resection and conventional open resection for early distal gastric cancer. Data were extracted from these trials by 3 reviewers independently and analyzed by Rev Man 5.0 software.
RESULTSA total of 1454 patients with early gastric cancer were enrolled, including 815 patients in the laparoscopic group and 630 patients in the conventional group. The mean number of dissected lymph nodes per patient was 3.26 less in the laparoscopic group as compared to the conventional group (WMD -3.26,95% CI -6.24~-0.27,P=0.03). The differences were not statistically significant in the articles published during 2005-2008 years (WMD -2.84, 95% CI -6.79~1.11, P=0.16), in D(1)(+)alpha/beta lymph node dissection (WMD -2.80, 95% CI -7.57~1.97, P=0.25), and in retrospective non-randomized trials (WMD -2.89, 95% CI -6.48~0.70,P=0.11).
CONCLUSIONWith the improvement in surgical skills, laparoscopic surgery and open surgery do not differ significantly in the number of retrieved lymph nodes for early distal gastric cancer with D(1)(+)alpha/beta lymph node dissection.
Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparotomy ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms ; pathology ; surgery
4."Two spaces" lateral lymph node dissection based on fascia anatomy for low rectal cancer.
Yi CHANG ; Hai Long LIU ; Mou Bin LIN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(4):315-320
As a treatment of rectal cancer, lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is still a controversial issue. The argument against LLND is that the procedure is complicated, and consequently results in a high incidence of postoperative urogenital dysfunction. The surgical modality from fascia to space is adopted by lateral lymph node dissection in "two spaces". This operation has significant advantages of clear location of nerves and blood vessels and simplified surgical procedures, so the surgical procedure can be repeated and modulated. The fascia propria of the rectum, urogenital fascia, vesicohypogastric fascia and parietal fascia constitute the dissection plane for lateral lymph node dissection.Two spaces refer to Latzko's pararectal space and paravesical space. During the establishment of fascia plane, the dissection of external iliac lymph node (No.293), commoniliac lymph node (No.273) and abdominal aortic bifurcation lymph node (No.280) can be performed. While in the "space" dissection, internal iliac lymph node (No.263), obturator lymph node (No.283), lateral sacral lymph node (No.260) and median sacral lymph node (No.270) can be removed. LD2 or LD3 lateral lymph node dissection prescribed by the Japanese Society of Colorectal Cancer can be completed according to the needs of the disease. This article describes the anatomical basis and standardized surgical procedures.
Dissection
;
Fascia/pathology*
;
Humans
;
Lymph Node Excision/methods*
;
Lymph Nodes/pathology*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
5.Management of lymph nodes in level II(b) during selective neck dissection for clinically N(0) neck in oral and oropharyngeal cancer.
Chinese Journal of Stomatology 2008;43(12):766-767
Humans
;
Lymph Nodes
;
pathology
;
surgery
;
Neck Dissection
;
methods
;
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
;
pathology
;
surgery
6.A meta-analysis of esophagectomy: the comparative study of Ivor-Lewis operation and Sweet operation.
Hong ZHANG ; Jian WANG ; Wenchen WANG ; Lin ZHOU ; Jiakuan CHEN ; Bo YANG ; Yanmin XIA ; Tao JIANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014;17(9):892-897
OBJECTIVEInvestigate the best surgical resection of esophageal cancer by comparing the efficacy and safety between Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and Sweet esophagectomy.
METHODSThe relevant literatures comparing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with Sweet esophagectomy were searched through PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Google scholar, CNKI, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data. RevMan 5.2 software was used for data analysis.
RESULTSA total of 4106 patients in 15 studies were reviewed and the data were pooled for analysis. Meta-analysis showed that, compared with the Sweet group, Ivor-Lewis operative time was significantly longer(pooled mean difference=57.40; 95%CI:42.43 to 72.38; P=0.000), operative bleeding was significantly higher(pooled mean difference=28.39, 95%CI:4.06 to 52.72, P=0.02); the number of lymph node dissection significantly more(pooled mean difference=4.19, 95%CI:3.06 to 5.32, P=0.000); No significant difference was present in hospital stay, vocal cord paralysis, chylous leakage, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leakage(all P>0.05). The 5-year survival between the two groups showed no significant difference(P=0.52).
CONCLUSIONSThe two kinds of operation have the same long term effect. Compared with Ivor-Lewis operation, Sweet operation is easier to perform, less time consuming and more tolerable. Ivor-Lewis operation can dissect more lymph nodes than Sweet operation, without increased complications.
Esophageal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes ; pathology
7.Strategy and prospect of laparoscopic lymph node dissection for locally advanced upper-third gastric cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2013;16(10):930-932
Laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced upper-third gastric cancer(LAUGC) must follow the same lymph node dissection extent with open surgery. Following the surgical steps can make the operation process more smoothly and achieve en bloc resection. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection is the difficult point during total gastrectomy for LAUGC. Selecting the right surgical approach, mastering spleen vascular anatomical types, and the cooperation of surgical team can help to shorten the learning curve of the operation. Although laparoscopic lymph node dissection for LAUGC is still in the exploratory stage, we believe that with the emergence of evidence-based medicine, it is expected to become one of the standard operations for LAUGC.
Gastrectomy
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy
;
methods
;
Learning Curve
;
Lymph Node Excision
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Spleen
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
pathology
;
surgery
8.Chinese experts consensus on standardized surgical management of specimens from radical gastrectomy (2022 edition).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(2):93-103
In the standardized diagnosis and treatment process of advanced gastric cancer, there is a unappreciated key link between standard radical surgery and accurate pathological reports. That is, the process of dissection, fixation, sampling and recording of the specimen by the surgeons, starting from specimen isolation to the management of the pathologist. Standardizing this process can not only accurately reflect the detailed distribution and exact number of lymph nodes, but also clarify the pathological stage of gastric cancer, so as to make adjuvant treatment plans. Moreover, it can also reflect the scope of intraoperative lymph node dissection to ensure the standardized implementation of surgery, including the overall dissection principle (en bloc resection), and therefore can provide a solid foundation for later related researches. So far, there is still a lack of complete and unified standard for the surgical management of specimens after radical gastrectomy in China. On the basis of the relevant researches and clinical practice about specimen management at home and abroad, the Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, in the name of the Gastric Cancer Professional Committee, Chinese Anticancer Association, as well as the Oncogastroenterology Professional Committee, Chinese Anticancer Association, organized dozens of experts to formulate a consensus on the standardized surgical management of specimens after repeated discussions and revisions for two years. This consensus is aimed to standardize the preparations, basic requirements and sample processing procedures before the surgical treatment of postoperative specimens after a radical surgery for gastric cancer patients, including the processing time of specimens, the processing and data archiving of gastric specimens, and lymph node grouping, sorting and fine sorting records, etc and with the purpose of standardizing the surgical treatment of postoperative specimens on the basis of standardized diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, in order to further promote the high-quality development of gastric cancer surgery in China.
Consensus
;
Gastrectomy/methods*
;
Humans
;
Lymph Node Excision/methods*
;
Lymph Nodes/pathology*
;
Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*
9.Robotic surgical system combined with colonoscopy for colon tumor resection and D1 lymph node dissection.
Wen Ming CUI ; Yuan CHANG ; Wen Xiu WANG ; Quan Bo ZHOU ; Hai Feng SUN ; Qing Qing ZHANG ; Fu Qi WANG ; Yan Zhen ZHANG ; Wei Tang YUAN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(8):731-733