Objective To discuss the curative effect and the prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Methods One hundred and twenty-seven cases of renal cell carcinoma treated with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy between October 2002 and Decem-ber 2006 were reviewed. The perioperative complications and postoperative renal function were recor-ded and analyzed. Post-operative 1-year and 3-year actuarial survival rates, disease-free survival rates and tumor-specific survival rates were caculated respectively with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Quality of life(QOL) was compared before and after surgery by Karnofsky Performance Status measuring scale. Results Among the 127 patients, 107 cases were followed up of mean 23 months (4-51 months). 1-year and 3-year actuarial survival rates, disease-free survival rates and tumor-specific survival rateswere 95.6%, 95.6%; 95.8%, 95.8% and 96.8%, 96.8%, respectively. 3-year actuarial survival rate, disease-free survival rate and tumor-specific survival rate were 97.1%,98.6%, 98.6% in pT1-2 tumors, and were 90.2%, 85.6%, 90.2%in pT3a, tumors. Disease-free survival rate and tumor-spe-cific survival rate had significant differences between patients in stage pT1-2 and patients in stagepTa3a.91.6% of the patients scored the post-operative QOL above 80 by Karnofsky Performance Sta-tus measuring scale. Conclusions Patients who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy have high survival rate, low complication incidence and good QOL. Post-operative survival rate is correlated with pathologic stage.

BACKGROUND:Cyclosporine A has shown its immunosuppressive effects and has been widely used in clinical organ transplantation.OBJECTIVE:To review the recent studies on the immunosuppressive mechanisms and the active pathway of cyclosporine A.RETRIEVAL STRATEGY:A compute-based online search of ScienceDirect Onsite,ProQuest,Springer and Ovid,based on the data from Peking University Medical Library,was undertaken for the English articles concerning with the immunosuppressive mechanism of cyclosporine A from January 1990 to December 2006,with the keywords of "cyclosporine A,mechanism/action,immunosuppression".Totally 68 articles were collected after the first trial,and the preliminary screening was conducted for the titles and abstracts.Inclusion criteria:articles related with the immunosuppressive mechanisms of cyclosporine A.Repetitive studies were excluded.Fifty accorded with the inclusive criteria,and 46 of them regarding tracheal transplantation were selected for the full-texts as the references.LITERATURE EVALUATION:Forty-six included articles included 6 ones about the clinical use and effects of cyclosporine A,and 40 involving the related studies on the molecular mechanisms of cyclosporine A.DATA SYNTHESIS:The review of literatures indicates that,the immunosuppressive mechanisms of cyclosporine A consist of:① the calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T-cells pathway,②the activation of JNK and P38 signaling pathways,③other effects.CONCLUSION:Cyclosporine A selectively regulates the function of peripheral blood lymphocytes subgroup,blocks the activation of cytotoxic T-cells,and possibly inhibits the formation or reaction of memory T-cells.But it doesn't affect activation and proliferation of suppressive T-cells,or expression of interleukin-2 receptors,which may induce selective immunosuppression.

Surgical treatment is the only cure treatment for patients with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in hepatic segment and upper hepatic segment.The accurate diagnosis of tumor thrombus is very important.In preoperative imaging examination,the abdominal enhanced CT scan and the inferior vena cava MRI scan were the best methods for the diagnosis and evaluation of the tumor thrombus in hepatic segment and upper hepatic segment.Compared with the tumor thrombus below the liver,the tumor thrombus in hepatic segment or above hepatic segment extend widely,and the operation are more difficult.For simple inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (the top of the thrombus has reached the level of hepatic vein),Retroperitoneal approach combined with transperitoneal approach should be used.Open surgery is the standard procedure for other tumor thrombus in hepatic segment and upper hepatic segment.In addition to exposure of inferior vena cava below the hepatic vein,the liver and the first hepatic hilum should be exposed.For tumor thrombus in the atrium,after the longitudinal incision of diaphragm,we use Milking technology to squeeze thrombus into inferior vena cava.Then we use catheterization technology to remove thrombus.For difficult atrial tumor thrombus,an extracorporeal circulation should be performed.The median incision in the chest should be performed to open the chest and open the pericardium and remove the tumor thrombus.Patients with tumor thrombus in hepatic segment or upper hepatic segment should be diagnosed as early as possible and they need actively treated by operation.

Objective To evaluate the technique and effect of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach. Methods Thirty-two donors (15 males and 17 females) underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at our institution. Twenty-nine left and 3 right procedures were performed. Under general anesthesia, all donors were placed in lateral decubitus. Three transretroperitoneal trocars were used through different ports. The first 12 mm port was placed 2 cm inferior to the edge of rib and 1 cm lateral to the edge of sarcospinous muscle. The second 10 mm port was about 8 to 10 cm anterior to the first, or on the anterior axillary line and 2 cm inferior to the edge of rib. The third 5 mm port was also on the anterior axillary line but 2 cm superior to the iliac crest. The surgeon created the retroperitoneal working space with a constructed catheter balloon device, and made the donor kidney and ureter dissociated. Renal arteries and veins were cut with endoscopic articulating linear stapler for the first 6 patients and then with Hemo-Lok, a plastic clip with a lock, for the others. Finally, the dissected donor kidney and ureter were taken out through an incision extended from the first trocar port. Results All the 32 donor grafts were dissected successfully. The duration of procedure was ranged from 60 to 180 min, and the volume of blood loss was from 20 to 200 ml. The range of warm ischemia time was 3 to 8 min, and 25 to 50 min of cold ischemia time. Short renal veins were found in 3 cases, 1 cm, 1.5 cm and 2 cm respectively. And one case of renal endoarterial injury occurred. On the day after transplantation, the urine volume of recipients was from 2800 to 10 100 ml. There was no delayed graft function found in recipients. Conclusion Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach is available and safe to renal transplantation with minimal invasion to donors. It can help to obtain donor grafts with higher quality, though skillful laparoscopic technique is demanded.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.Methods A total of 126 patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy from November 2002 to June 2006.The operation was performed through 3 lumbar ports.The renal artery and veins were blocked with the Hem-o-lok and then severed;the ureter was severed near the iliac blood vessel.Results A conversion to open surgery was required in 2 patients because of bleeding and in 1 patient because of severe adhesion.The mean operation time was 115 min(range,60~255 min) and the mean blood loss was 112ml(range,20~1000 ml).Blood transfusion was required in 2 patients.Complications occurred in 7 patients(spermatic vein injury in 1 patient,accessory renal artery injury in 1 patient,inferior vena cava injury in 1 patient,hemorrhage of renal artery stump in 1 patient,renal vein injury in 2 patients,and pancreatic tail injury in 1 patient).The patient with inferior vena cava injury was followed for 2 years and no abnormal findings were found.The patient with pancreatic tail leakage was followed for 1 year and no pancreatitis or liquid in the renal fossa was detected.The remaining 5 patients with complications presented no abnormal findings.The mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 days(range,4~8 days).Pathological results included renal clear cell carcinoma in 117 patients,cystic renal cell carcinoma in 3 patients,renal pelvis transitional cell carcinoma in 2 patients,chromophobe carcinoma in 1 patient,hamartoma in 2 patients,and oxyphil cell tumor in 1 patient.One patient developed a liver metastasis 6 months after operation,and died 1 year after operation.The rest of 125 patients were followed for a mean of 27 months(range,1~43 months),and survived without renal fossa or incision metastasis,or distant recurrence.Conclusions Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a safe,reliable,and effective technique for renal tumors.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance for the treatment of renal calculi. Methods Percutaneous nephrolithotomy using pneumatic or holmium laser lithotripsy under ultrasonic guidance was performed in 26 patients from January 2005 to November 2006.Among them,46 patients had single stones and 27 had multiple renal calculi.Unilateral renal calculi were found in 67 patients and bilateral calculi in 6.Staghorn calculi were identified in 11 patients.Results Of the 73 patients,a successful stone removal on one session was achieved in 57 patients,a second-look stone removal was needed in 13 patients,and 3 patients underwent three times of operation.During the operation,a single tract was used in 53 patients,double tracts in 18 patients,and three tracts in 2.A mini-invasive tract(F14～F18) was used in 47 patients,and a standard tract(F24) was established in the remaining 26 patients.The operation time was 50～160 min(mean,86 min).The stone-free rate was 96.2%(68/73),and the residual stones in other 5 patients were all

Objective To evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach. Methods From December 2003 to June 2004,6 patients underwent laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (younger brother to elder sister in 1 case,elder brother to younger brother in 1, younger sister to elder brother in 1,elder sister to younger brother in 1,father to son in 1,mother to son in 1).For tissue matching,1 case was mismatched of 0 locus,2,of 2 loci and 3,of 3 loci.The results of PRA and lymphocytotoxicity test were negative.The patient was placed in the lateral decubitus.With 3 trocars, the left kidney was dissected via retroperitoneal approach.The arteries and veins were cut off by endoscopic articulating linear cutter. The donor's left kidney was taken out through a 6-7 cm long incision between 2 trocars.Staplers on renal arteries and veins were cut off,and the donor kidney was perfused with liquid,and then was implanted at the right iliac fossa of the recipients.Triple immunosuppressant therapy was used to prevent rejection. Results Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was successfully performed on all the 6 cases by retroperitoneal approach.The kidney transplantations using the donor live kidneys were also successful.Postoperatively,the mean urine volume was 5036 ml(range,3500-6500 ml) on the first day;the mean serum creatinine level was 598 ?mol/L on the first day and 129 ?mol/L at 1 month.Follow-up of 3-9 months showed that the renal function was normal and no rejection occurred. Conclusions Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach is safe,feasible,and less invasive to the donor; however,this technique needs skilled surgeons of laparoscopy and renal transplantation.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Methods A total of 46 patients (24 males and 22 females;age range,23-86 years;mean age,58 years) underwent retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy from November 2002 to July 2004.Of the 46 cases,43 were detected by B-ultrasound during physical examination and the rest 3,when visiting doctors due to painless hematuria.The masses by B-ultrasound was on average 4.5 cm (range,1.5-8.0 cm) in diameter, with 17 masses at the upper pole of the kidney,13 at the middle and 16 at the inferior pole.CT scan was performed on all the 46 cases and MRI,on 41.The tumor size detected by CT and MRI was consistent with that by B-ultrasound.Preoperatively,3 cases had the tumors of clinical stage T 1N 0M 0,38 of T 2N 0M 0 and 5 of T 3aN 0M 0. Results The operative time was 60-255 min (mean,145 min),and blood loss was 20-1000 ml (mean,133 ml).Adrenalectomy was performed on 32 patients (70%).Complications occurred in 3 cases,of whom only 1 required conversion to open surgery due to injury of genital gland vein,with blood loss of 1000 ml.Pathology showed that 41 cases were of renal clear cell carcinoma,2 of cystic renal cell carcinoma,1 of chromophobe carcinoma,1 of hamartoma and 1 of oxyphil cell tumor.During the follow-up of 1-20 months (mean,9 months),45 patients survived;only 1 died of liver metastasis. Conclusions Retroperitoneoscopy radical nephrectomy is safe and effective.

Objective To summary the experience of diagnosis and treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of kidney recipients following renal transplantation.Methods From Jan. 2001 to July 2005, 600 kidney transplantations were performed and 9 patients were diagnosed as having renal tumors by B-ultrasound, IVU, cystoscopy, CT etc., including 3 cases of tumor of renal pelvis, 2 cases of tumor of ureter and 4 cases of tumor of cyst. Corresponding surgical operations were performed.Results All operations were successful and most patients got satisfactory results. Conclusion Kidney recipients have a higher rate of transitional cell carcinoma. Kidney recipients with hematuria should be examined carefully with cystoscopy, retrograde pyelography and cystourethroscopy.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of living related kidney transplants (LRKT). Methods Retrospectively clinical results of 25 LRKT were reviewed and analyzed. Results Living related donors underwent nephrectomy without any complications and the donors have had normal renal function on follow up studies.All the renal grafts survived.Two recipients experienced delayed graft function recovery,Both the patients and the grafts have been surviving. Conclusions The patient and graft survival rates of LRDT are better than cadaveric donor transplantation.Living related donor serves as an alternate way of kidney source.