Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of artificial intelligence(AI)technique in delineating target volume for patients with lung cancer during radiotherapy.Methods:A total of 60 patients with lung cancer who received radiotherapy in Pingxiang People's Hospital from September 2021 to March 2023 were selected,and they were divided into control group and observation group by random envelope method,with 30 cases in each group.The control group outlined target volume as conventional method.The observation group adopted deep learning technique to conduct train,and then,UNet network model was output and was used to complete automatic delineation for the target volume of radiotherapy for patients.The near-term efficacy,planning target region volume,radiation dose of target volume,volume and dose of organ at risk(OAR),survival time and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between two groups.Results:The objective relief rate(ORR)of observation group was 70.0％(21/30)after intervention,which was higher than that[46.67％(14/30)]of control group,and the difference was statistically significant(x2=5.691,P＜0.05).The radiation doses of internal target volume(ITV)and planning target volume in observation group were lower respectively than those in control group(t=4.591,4.934,P＜0.05),and the differences of them were significant,respectively.The volume percentages(V20,V5)of the exposed radiation dose that were higher than 20 Gy and 5 Gy in normal lung tissue,the exposed mean lung dose(MLD)of bilateral lungs and the exposed dose of 1cc volume(D1cc)of bilateral lungs in observation group were all lower than those in control group,the differences were statistically significant(t=5.249,4.571,6.092,5.339,P＜0.05),respectively.There was no statistical significance in the incidence of adverse reaction between two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion:The application of AI technique in delineating target volume of radiotherapy for lung cancer can improve ORR,which is helpful to decrease the planning target volume,D95 and conformal index,and reduce the volume and dose of OAR.It does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions.

Objective To investigate the prognosis and influencing factors of postoperative low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) for rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter?preserving radical resection. Methods A retrospective case?control study was used in this study. Clinical data of 268 rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter?preserving radical resection at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively collected. Inclusion criteria: (1) operation procedure was total mesorectal excision (TME) and sphincter?preserving radical resection; (2) rectal cancer was confirmed by postoperative pathology; (3) age of patient was ≥ 18 years old. Exclusion criteria: (1) patient who had history of pelvic surgery and pelvic fractures, which would affect the anorectal function; (2) patient who had history of preoperative chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome, which would affect defecation; (3) patient who developed postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, which would affect defecation function; (4) patient who received long?term use of drugs, which would affect the function of gastrointestinal tract or anus; (5) patient suffered from mental illness, who was unable to communicate properly; (6) patient who was lack of clinical data or had incomplete clinical data. Patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and LARS was diagnosed and graded according to the LARS score scale. The LARS score ranged from 0 to 42 points, and 0 to 20 was difined as no LARS, 21 to 29 was mild LARS, and 30 to 42 was severe LARS. LARS score>20 points at any time point was defined as postoperative LARS. Severe LARS transferring into mild LARS and mild LARS transferring into no LARS was defined as symptom improvement. Incidence and outcomes of LARS were evaluated. The factors associated with LARS outcomes were analyzed using χ2 test and logistic regression model. Results A total of 268 patients were enrolled. The incidence of LARS was 42.9% (115/268), 32.5% (87/268) and 20.1% (54/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, and no new case of LARS was found after 3 months postoperatively. The incidence of mild LARS was 25.7% (69/268), 17.2% (46/268) and 8.6% (23/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, and mild LARS incidence at 6 months was significantly lower than that at 3 months (χ2=5.857, P=0.016), and was significantly higher than that at 12 months (χ2=8.799, P=0.003). The incidence of severe LARS was 17.2% (46/268), 15.3% (41/268) and 11.6% (31/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, without significant difference among 3 time points (all P>0.05). The improvement rate within one year after surgery in patients with mild LARS diagnosed at 3 months was significantly higher than that in patients with severe LARS (88.4% vs. 32.6%, χ2=38.340, P<0.001). Univariate analysis showed that female, distance from anastomosis to anal verge<5 cm and tumor diameter≥5 cm were associated with unsatisfied LARS outcomes (all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that distance from anastomosis to anal verge<5 cm was an independent risk factor for LARS outcome (OR=3.589, 95% CI: 1.163 to 2.198, P<0.001). Conclusions The incidence of LARS after laparoscopic sphincter?preserving radical resection decreases with time. The improvement rate within postoperative 1?year of severe LARS is lower than that of mild LARS. Low anastomotic position may lead to impaired improvement of LARS.

Objective To investigate the prognosis and influencing factors of postoperative low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) for rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter?preserving radical resection. Methods A retrospective case?control study was used in this study. Clinical data of 268 rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter?preserving radical resection at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively collected. Inclusion criteria: (1) operation procedure was total mesorectal excision (TME) and sphincter?preserving radical resection; (2) rectal cancer was confirmed by postoperative pathology; (3) age of patient was ≥ 18 years old. Exclusion criteria: (1) patient who had history of pelvic surgery and pelvic fractures, which would affect the anorectal function; (2) patient who had history of preoperative chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome, which would affect defecation; (3) patient who developed postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, which would affect defecation function; (4) patient who received long?term use of drugs, which would affect the function of gastrointestinal tract or anus; (5) patient suffered from mental illness, who was unable to communicate properly; (6) patient who was lack of clinical data or had incomplete clinical data. Patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and LARS was diagnosed and graded according to the LARS score scale. The LARS score ranged from 0 to 42 points, and 0 to 20 was difined as no LARS, 21 to 29 was mild LARS, and 30 to 42 was severe LARS. LARS score>20 points at any time point was defined as postoperative LARS. Severe LARS transferring into mild LARS and mild LARS transferring into no LARS was defined as symptom improvement. Incidence and outcomes of LARS were evaluated. The factors associated with LARS outcomes were analyzed using χ2 test and logistic regression model. Results A total of 268 patients were enrolled. The incidence of LARS was 42.9% (115/268), 32.5% (87/268) and 20.1% (54/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, and no new case of LARS was found after 3 months postoperatively. The incidence of mild LARS was 25.7% (69/268), 17.2% (46/268) and 8.6% (23/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, and mild LARS incidence at 6 months was significantly lower than that at 3 months (χ2=5.857, P=0.016), and was significantly higher than that at 12 months (χ2=8.799, P=0.003). The incidence of severe LARS was 17.2% (46/268), 15.3% (41/268) and 11.6% (31/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, without significant difference among 3 time points (all P>0.05). The improvement rate within one year after surgery in patients with mild LARS diagnosed at 3 months was significantly higher than that in patients with severe LARS (88.4% vs. 32.6%, χ2=38.340, P<0.001). Univariate analysis showed that female, distance from anastomosis to anal verge<5 cm and tumor diameter≥5 cm were associated with unsatisfied LARS outcomes (all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that distance from anastomosis to anal verge<5 cm was an independent risk factor for LARS outcome (OR=3.589, 95% CI: 1.163 to 2.198, P<0.001). Conclusions The incidence of LARS after laparoscopic sphincter?preserving radical resection decreases with time. The improvement rate within postoperative 1?year of severe LARS is lower than that of mild LARS. Low anastomotic position may lead to impaired improvement of LARS.

Objective To investigate the design,incisional method and clinical experiences of using the mi cro-dissected polyfoliate anterolateral thigh perforator flap to repair of complex soft tissue defect in extremities.Methods From June,2017 to September,2018,12 cases of different kinds of complex soft tissue defect in extremities were repaired by micro-dissected free polyfoliate anterolateral thigh perforator flap.Each flap was divided into two cutaneous perforators to give two separate flap with a common vascular supply.The flaps were cut from the superficial layer of the deep cervical fesciae and without fascia lata.The donor sites were treated by subcutaneous cosmetic suture.Patients were followed-up by outpatient service,telephone and WeChat video to observe and record the flap's appearance,sensory recovery,extremities function and the scars of the donor site to evaluate its clinical efficacy.Results All flaps survived without vascular crisis happened except one-leaf necrosis occurred,which healed with local flap transferring.The donor sites remained linear scars.The mean flap thickness of this group after micro-dissection was (4.5±0.5) mm.All the patients were followed-up for 5-15 months.The 2 point discrimination ranged between 0.5-2.0 cm.Sensory restoration ranking was S3-S3+.The range of montion of wrist joint was 65°-90°,and that of ankle joint was 40°-60°.Conclusion The micro-dissected polyfoliate anterolateral thigh perforator flap is an ideal method for complex and irregular multiple sites soft tissue defect in extremities as it can keep good economic benefit and minimal damage to the donor site.

Objective To investigate the application of equivalent uniform dose(EUD)in intensity-modulated rotational radiotherapy and to explore optimization methods for improving the quality of modulated treatment plans.Methods The impact of the parameter a in the EUD formula on the characteristics of the EUD curve was analyzed using Python.Thirty cases of head and neck tumors,thoracic tumors,and pelvic tumors were randomly selected for treatment planning.Dose optimization for the target area and organs at risk were performed using a physics-based optimization approach or an optimization approach that combines physical constraints with the EUD function.The dose distribution and compliance with constraints of the two groups of plans were compared,while also observing the effect of different values of a on the planning outcomes.Results The impact of the value of a on the changes in EUD curve characteristics was consistent with its impact on the results of EUD plan optimization.When -15≤a≤-5,the dose distribution in the target area was more uniform;when 1≤a≤7,the effect on the uniform dose and low-dose regions in organs at risk was more noticeable;when 10≤a≤30,the effect of constraining the high-dose regions in organs at risk was more pronounced,with the EUD for the target area and organs at risk exhibiting different expressions under different a values.The study also found that the target dose distribution and the protection of organs at risk in the EUD optimization group were better than those in the physical optimization group only.Conclusion The a-value has a significant impact on the,the dose distribution in the target area and the organ at risk,providing a reference for the setting of a-value while using EUD to optimize the intensity modulation plan.The using of EUD optimization method can not only achieve excellent dose distribution in the target area,but also significantly reduce the normal tissue dose and the probability of complications,which has certain clinical application value.

Objective: To investigate the prognosis and influencing factors of postoperative low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) for rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was used in this study. Clinical data of 268 rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively collected. Inclusion criteria: (1) operation procedure was total mesorectal excision (TME) and sphincter-preserving radical resection; (2) rectal cancer was confirmed by postoperative pathology; (3) age of patient was ≥ 18 years old. Exclusion criteria: (1) patient who had history of pelvic surgery and pelvic fractures, which would affect the anorectal function; (2) patient who had history of preoperative chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome, which would affect defecation; (3) patient who developed postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, which would affect defecation function; (4) patient who received long-term use of drugs, which would affect the function of gastrointestinal tract or anus; (5) patient suffered from mental illness, who was unable to communicate properly; (6) patient who was lack of clinical data or had incomplete clinical data. Patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and LARS was diagnosed and graded according to the LARS score scale. The LARS score ranged from 0 to 42 points, and 0 to 20 was difined as no LARS, 21 to 29 was mild LARS, and 30 to 42 was severe LARS. LARS score >20 points at any time point was defined as postoperative LARS. Severe LARS transferring into mild LARS and mild LARS transferring into no LARS was defined as symptom improvement. Incidence and outcomes of LARS were evaluated. The factors associated with LARS outcomes were analyzed using χ² test and logistic regression model. Results: A total of 268 patients were enrolled. The incidence of LARS was 42.9% (115/268), 32.5% (87/268) and 20.1% (54/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, and no new case of LARS was found after 3 months postoperatively. The incidence of mild LARS was 25.7% (69/268), 17.2% (46/268) and 8.6% (23/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, and mild LARS incidence at 6 months was significantly lower than that at 3 months (χ²=5.857, P=0.016), and was significantly higher than that at 12 months (χ²=8.799, P=0.003). The incidence of severe LARS was 17.2% (46/268), 15.3% (41/268) and 11.6% (31/268) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively respectively, without significant difference among 3 time points (all P>0.05). The improvement rate within one year after surgery in patients with mild LARS diagnosed at 3 months was significantly higher than that in patients with severe LARS (88.4% vs. 32.6%, χ²=38.340, P<0.001). Univariate analysis showed that female, distance from anastomosis to anal verge < 5 cm and tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm were associated with unsatisfied LARS outcomes (all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that distance from anastomosis to anal verge <5 cm was an independent risk factor for LARS outcome (OR=3.589, 95% CI: 1.163 to 2.198, P<0.001). Conclusions The incidence of LARS after laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection decreases with time. The improvement rate within postoperative 1-year of severe LARS is lower than that of mild LARS. Low anastomotic position may lead to impaired improvement of LARS.

OBJECTIVE: To explore association of the expression levels of adenylate cyclase-associated protein 2 (CAP2) in gastric cancer tissues with the histopathology and long-term prognosis of the malignancy. METHODS: This study was conducted among a total of 105 patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy in our hospital between January, 2010 and October, 2013. Immunohistochemistry was used to quantitatively assess the expression of CAP2 in gastric cancer tissues and the adjacent tissues. Based on the median relative expression level of CAP2 of 3.5, the patients were divided into low CAP2 expression group (=52) and high CAP2 expression group (=53). The Cox regression model was used to analyze the effect of CAP2 expression on the 5-year survival rate of the patients, and ROC curve analysis was used to assess the predictive value of CAP2 expression for the patients' long-term survival. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the expression levels of CAP2 ( < 0.01) and Ki67 ( < 0.01) were significantly higher in gastric cancer tissues than in the adjacent tissues, and the expression level of CAP2 was positively correlated with Ki67 ( < 0.01), peripheral blood CEA ( < 0.01) and CA19-9 ( < 0.01). The percentages of patients with CEA≥5 μg/L, CA19-9≥37 kU/L, pathological grade of G3-G4, T stage of 3-4, and N stage of 2-3 were significantly higher in patients with high CAP2 expression than in those with low CAP2 expression ( < 0.05). Kaplan- Meier survival analysis showed that the 5-year survival rate was significantly lower in patients with a high CAP2 expression ( < 0.01). A high expression level of CAP2, CEA≥5μg/L, CA19-9≥37 and pathological grades G3-G4 were all independent risk factors for shortened 5-year survival after radical gastrectomy ( < 0.01). With the relative expression level of 3.45 as the cut-off value, the sensitivity of CAP2 was 70.15% for predicting death 5 years after the surgery, with a specificity of 71.05% and an area under the curve of 0.779 ( < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS CAP2 is highly expressed in gastric cancer tissues in close relation with the tumor progression. CAP2 is an independent risk factor for 5-year survival rate after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and can be of clinical value in prognostic evaluation of the patients.
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing ; metabolism ; Gastrectomy ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Membrane Proteins ; metabolism ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; metabolism ; pathology ; Survival Rate