Objective:To investigate the efficacy of internal fixation with common intramedullary nail versus bone cement reinforced antirotation intramedullary nail in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Methods:A total of 106 patients with femoral trochanteric fractures who were surgically treated in Weihaiwei People's Hospital from January 2018 to January 2019 were selected and divided into a control group and an observation group with 53 patients in each group. The control group received internal fixation with common intramedullary nails. The observation group was fixed with bone cement reinforced anti-rotation intramedullary nails. The therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in the amount of blood loss, postoperative Visual Analogue Scale score, amount of fluid drainage, postoperative time to get out of bed, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups ( t = 1.33, 0.19, 0.34, 0.58, 0.37, all P > 0.05). Operative time in the observation group was significantly longer than that in the control group [(80.21 ± 6.52) minutes vs. (75.92 ± 8.15) minutes, t = 2.99, P < 0.05]. Time to fracture healing in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(9.25 ± 1.12) weeks vs. (10.05 ± 1.31) weeks, t = 3.37, P < 0.05]. The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [3.77% (2/53) vs. 16.98% (9/53), χ2 = 4.97, P = 0.025]. At 6 and 12 months after surgery, Harris hip scores in the observation group were (82.84 ± 6.58) points and (85.55 ± 7.91) points, respectively, which were significantly higher than (78.35 ± 7.54) points and (79.92 ± 9.94) points in the control group ( t = 3.26, 3.22, both P < 0.05). Conclusion:Internal fixation with bone cement-reinforced anti-rotation intramedullary nails for treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures can shorten the time to fracture healing, reduce complications, and improve hip joint function.