1.Review of Proximal Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and PFNA-2 – Our Local Experience
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2011;5(2):1-5
The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) device was
recently introduced as an option for intramedullary
management of pertrochanteric hip fractures. We report here
local results with this relatively new implant. Sixty-two
patients with pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures
underwent intramedullary fixation with PFNA devices in our
centre during the 14 month period from September 2008 to
October 2009. Data for this report were retrieved from
clinical case records and operative notes. We recorded the
age, gender, length of stay and operative time, preoperative ambulatory status and days required to regain mobility. Fractures were classified using the AO classification (A1, A2 and A3). Complications were also identified.There were 15 male and 47 female patients and the mean age was 74.3years. The mean surgical duration was 76.1min and the average length of hospitalisation was 14.5 days. Five cases were noted to have femoral shaft fracture and no occurrences of screw cutout. We found that 83.9% of the patients were able to regain preoperative mobility status by 6 months following surgery. We conclude that the PFNA is an effective implant for stabilisation of proximal hip fractures and that the local complication rate is similar to reports from other centres.
2.Is there a Significant Difference in Surgery and Outcomes between Unipolar and Bipolar Hip Hemiarthroplasty? A Retrospective Study of a Single Institution in Singapore
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2011;5(1):3-7
Objective: The aim was to compare outcomes differences between unipolar and bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in one institution for the local geriatric population. Methodology: A retrospective review of 291 patients aged 70 and above who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty for neck of femur fracture from February 2004 to November 2006 was performed. Results: Operative time was lower in the unipolar group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of superficial wound infection, d
3.Can We Predict ACL Hamstring Graft Sizes in the Asian Male? A Clinical Relationship Study of Anthropometric Features and 4 Strand Hamstring Graft Sizes.
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2010;4(2):9-12
Introduction: This study was undertaken to investigate if such anthropometric measurements (i.e., height, weight and body mass index) can be used to predict graft diameters in 4 strand semitendinosus and gracilis hamstring autografts. Methods: The study sample consisted of 89 consecutive male patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autografts. Intraoperative measurements of the fashioned quadrupled hamstring graft were performed using sizing tubes calibrated t
Orthopaedic
4.Evaluation of different bioimpedance methods for assessing body composition in Asian non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients
Sean WY LEE ; Clara Lee Ying NGOH ; Horng Ruey CHUA ; Sabrina HAROON ; Weng Kin WONG ; Evan JC LEE ; Titus WL LAU ; Sunil SETHI ; Boon Wee TEO
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2019;38(1):71-80
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with fluid retention, which increases total body water (TBW) and leads to changes in intracellular water (ICW) and extracellular water (ECW). This complicates accurate assessments of body composition. Analysis of bioelectrical impedance may improve the accuracy of evaluation in CKD patients and multiple machines and technologies are available. We compared body composition by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) against multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis (BIA) in a multi-ethnic Asian population of stable, non-dialysis CKD patients. METHODS: We recruited 98 stable CKD patients comprising 54.1% men and 70.4% Chinese, 9.2% Malay, 13.3% Indian, and 8.2% other ethnicities. Stability was defined as no variation in serum creatinine > 20% over three months. Patients underwent BIS analyses using a Fresenius body composition monitor, while BIA analyses employed a Bodystat Quadscan 4000. RESULTS: Mean TBW values by BIS and BIA were 33.6 ± 7.2 L and 38.3 ± 7.4 L; mean ECW values were 15.8 ± 3.2 L and 16.9 ± 2.7 L; and mean ICW values were 17.9 ± 4.3 L and 21.0 ± 4.9 L, respectively. Mean differences for TBW were 4.6 ± 1.9 L (P < 0.001), for ECW they were 1.2 ± 0.5 L (P < 0.001), and for ICW they were 3.2 ±1.8 L (P < 0.001). BIA and BIS measurements were highly correlated: TBW r = 0.970, ECW r = 0.994, and ICW r = 0.926. Compared with BIA, BIS assessments of fluid overload appeared to be more associated with biochemical and clinical indicators. CONCLUSION: Although both BIA and BIS can be used for body water assessment, clinicians should be aware of biases that exist between bioimpedance techniques. The values of body water assessments in our study were higher in BIA than in BIS. Ethnicity, sex, body mass index, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were associated with these biases.
Adult
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Bias (Epidemiology)
;
Body Composition
;
Body Mass Index
;
Body Water
;
Creatinine
;
Electric Impedance
;
Glomerular Filtration Rate
;
Humans
;
Kidney Diseases
;
Male
;
Methods
;
Nutrition Assessment
;
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
;
Spectrum Analysis
;
Water