BACKGROUNDSimultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) has been proven to be a favorable treatment for combined renal and hepatic end-stage disease. However, recipients receiving SLKT have a long medical history, poor general condition that is often accompanied by anemia, hypoalbuminemia, coagulopathy, water-electrolyte imbalance and acid-base disorders. This study aimed to explore the indications, surgical techniques, therapeutic experience, prevention and treatment of postoperative complications of SLKT.

METHODSThe clinical data of 22 SLKTs cases performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2001 to December 2008 were retrospectively studied. Indications for SLKT, surgical techniques, perioperative fluid management, immunosuppressive regimen and experience in prevention and treatment of postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTSAll operations were successfully performed. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 cases (59.1%), including pleural effusions (7), intra-abdominal bleeding (2), biliary complications (2), repeated upper gastrointestinal bleeding (1), and acute liver graft rejection (1). All complications were treated conservatively. In this study, there were five deaths during follow-up, in which three perioperative deaths occurred due to serious conditions. Mortality at 3 months was 13.6%. The one and three year patient survival rate was 81.3% and 73.9% respectively.

CONCLUSIONSSLKT is an effective therapy for end-stage liver disease with chronic renal failure or severe damage to renal function. It is a complex surgical procedure, causing a large disturbance of circulation and fluid balance, and more postoperative complications. The SLKT surgical techniques selected are based on the experience of surgeons, the anatomy of the recipient and primary diseases. It is essential to use the correct perioperative fluid management, reasonable immunosuppressive regimen, and prevention and treatment of postoperative infections, to improve the long-term patient survival after SLKT.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Kidney Transplantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; mortality ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; mortality ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo compare the advantages and disadvantages of four surgical techniques in orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODSA total of 135 adult recipients receiving cadaveric whole liver grafts were divided into four groups according to the surgeries they received: group A (n=22) underwent classic orthotopic liver transplantation, group B (n=79) underwent modified piggyback liver transplantation, group C (n=18) underwent classical piggyback liver transplantation, and group D (n=16) underwent modified classic orthotopic liver transplantation. The clinical data of these recipients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTSThe operation time, anhepatic time, and intra-operation bleeding volume among these four groups were significantly different (P < 0.05). The incidence of transient renal damage in group C was significantly lower than that in other groups (P < 0.05), while the complication rates and survival rates were not significantly different in the early stage after the operation.

CONCLUSIONSSurgery techniques should be carefully selected based on the individual patients's pre-operative condition. The modified classic orthotopic liver transplantation is a preferred technique for tumor patients or patients with surgical history of upper abdomen.

Adult ; Humans ; Liver Diseases ; mortality ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUNDAlthough liver transplantation has become a standard therapy for end-stage liver diseases, the experience of pediatric liver transplantation is limited in China. In this article we report our experience in pediatric liver transplantation, and summarize its characters in their indications, surgical techniques, and postoperative managements.

METHODSThirty-one children (< or = 18 years old) underwent liver transplantation in our centers. The mean age at transplantation was 12.4 years old (ranged from 5 months to 18 years) with 7 children being less than 4 years of age at transplantation. The most common diagnosis of patients who underwent liver transplantation were biliary atresia, Wilson's disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, glycogen storage disease, hepatoblastoma, urea cycle defects, fulminant hepatic failure, etc. The surgical procedures included 12 standard (without venovenous bypass), 6 pigyback, 6 reduced-size, 3 split, 3 living donor liver transplantation, and 1 Domino liver transplantation. The triple-drug (FK506, steroid, and mycophenolate mofetil) immunosuppressive regimen was used in most of patients. Patients were followed up for a mean of 21.8 months.

RESULTSFive of the 31 patients died during perioperative time; mortality rate was 16.1%. The reasons of death were infections, primary non-function, heart failure, and hypovolemic shock. Postoperative complications in 10 patients included biliary leakage, acute rejection, abdominal infection, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and pulmonary infection. Overall patient cumulative survival rate at 1-, 3-, and 5-year was 78.1%, 62.6%, 62.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONSThe most common indications of pediatric liver transplantation were congenital end-stage liver diseases. According to patients' age and body weight, standard, piggyback, reduced-size, split, or living donor liver transplantation should be performed. Pediatric liver transplantation especially requires higher surgical skills. The early postoperative management is the key to success. Postoperative bile leak was common, but most patients underwent liver transplantation had a better prognosis.

Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; mortality ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate

BACKGROUNDOrthotopic liver retransplantation (re-OLT) is the only effective therapy for irreversible failure of a liver graft. Early and late graft failure gives way to two different clinical conditions that should be discussed separately. This study was designed to compare early and late re-OLT for patients with poor graft function after primary transplantation at our center and sum up our clinical experience in re-OLT.

METHODSThe clinical data of 31 re-OLTs at our center from January 2004 to February 2007 were analyzed retrospectively, consisting of the first group with 14 cases of early re-OLT and the second group with 17 cases of late re-OLT.

RESULTSBiliary tract complications were the main indications for early re-OLT (57.1%) and late re-OLT (52.9%). Other common indications were vascular complications in early re-OLT and recurrence of primary diseases in late re-OLT. No significant differences were found between the groups with regard to the volume of bleeding during operation, cold ischemia time, operative duration, and perioperative mortality; except for the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. Outcome was fatal for 7 patients in early re-OLT and 9 patients in late re-OLT. Two deaths were due to multiple organ failure with 3 deaths due to severe sepsis-related disease in early re-OLT, and 4 deaths were due to severe sepsis-related disease with 3 deaths due to recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in late re-OLT. One and 2-year actuarial survival rates after re-OLT were 55.2% and 36.9%, respectively, for patients in early re-OLT, and 65.1% and 52% respectively, for patients in late re-OLT. No significant differences were found regarding survival rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONSSimilar clinical results can be achieved in early and late re-OLT. Proper indications and optimal operation timing, adequate preoperative preparation, experienced surgical procedures, and effective perioperative anti-infection strategy contribute to the improvement of overall survival rates of patients after re-OLT.

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reoperation ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors

BACKGROUNDOnly a few reviews of small case series and individual case reports including a relatively small number of adult patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) are available, and there has been no prospective evaluation of the long-term outcome of HPS patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of HPS in OLT patients with chronic end-stage liver-disease, and the short-term and long-term postoperative outcome of HPS patients after OLT.

METHODSThis prospective study included 31 HPS and 30 control, non-HPS patients. The preoperative conditions were similar between the two groups. Twenty-six of 31 HPS patients and all of the non-HPS patients underwent OLT. Standardized methods, such as arterial blood gas at room air and 99m-technetium macroaggregated albumin ((99m)Tc MAA) lung and brain perfusion scanning were performed for the diagnosis of HPS. Patients were followed after OLT.

RESULTSThe incidence of HPS in OLT patients was 9.3% (26/279). Hypoxemia in HPS was obviously improved with a normalized shunt of (99m)Tc MAA in the lungs after OLT. The immediate postoperative survival rate (within 28 days after OLT) of HPS was 76.9% (20/26). The one year survival was 61.5% (16/26) and four-year survival was 57.7% (15/26); much higher than HPS patients without OLT (0). But high postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed in HPS patients whose death occurred within 3 months of OLT due to complications summarized in this study.

CONCLUSIONSLiver transplantation was an effective treatment for HPS. But the postoperative mortality rate following OLT in HPS patients was still much higher than that of patients without HPS.

Female ; Hepatopulmonary Syndrome ; mortality ; surgery ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the donor risks and potential recipient benefits of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODSFrom January 2002 to December 2006, a total of 27 LDLT for HCC patients were performed in our center, of which 25 received right lobe grafts and 2 received dual grafts. The clinical and follow-up data of these 27 recipients and 29 donors were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTSOf the 29 donors, the overall complication rate was 17.24% (5 cases). Two cases (6.90%) experienced major complications (one with intra-abdominal bleeding and one with portal vein thrombosis) and three cases (10.34%) experienced minor ones (fat necrosis and infection of the surgical skin wound in one, pleural effusion in another and transient chyle leakage in the third). All donors were fully recovered and returned to their previous work. No recipients developed small-for-size syndrome. The overall HCC patients survival rate at 1- and 3-years was 84.01% and 71.40%, respectively, similar to that of patients undergoing LDLT for various nonmalignant diseases during the same period (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONAlthough further study is needed to fully assess the risks and benefits of LDLT for the HCC patients and donors, our present results preliminarily suggest that LDLT offers an acceptable chance and duration of survival in patients with HCC, and it is a relatively safe procedure.

Adult ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; mortality ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; mortality ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; mortality ; Living Donors ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Survival ; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to evaluate the infectious complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children. We enrolled 95 children (38 boys and 57 girls) who underwent LDLT from 1994 to 2004. The median age was 22 months (range, 6 months to 15 yr). We retrospectively investigated the proven episodes of bacterial, viral, and fungal infection. There occurred 150 infections in 67 (70%) of 95 patients (1.49 infections/patient); 74 in 43 patients were bacterial, 2 in 2 were fungal, and 74 in 42 were viral. The most common sites of bacterial infection were the bloodstream (33%) and abdomen (25%). Most of the bacterial infections occurred within the first month after LDLT. Bacterial and fungal infections did not result in any deaths. The most common causes of viral infection were Epstein-Barr virus in 37 patients and cytomegalovirus in 18. Seven of the 14 deaths after LDLT were associated with viral infection. Our study suggests that infection is one of the important causes of morbidity and mortality after LDLT. Especially careful monitoring and management of viral infections is crucial for improving the outcome of LDLT in children.
Adult ; Child ; Communicable Diseases/*etiology/microbiology/mortality/virology ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use ; Infection/*etiology/microbiology/mortality/virology ; Liver Transplantation/*adverse effects/mortality ; *Living Donors ; Male ; *Postoperative Complications/microbiology/mortality/virology ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo investigate the outcome and relative problems of patients over 60 years old underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODSData of patients over 60 years old (>or= 60 years old group, n = 59) patients recipients who were 18 to 59 years old (< 60 years old group, n = 500) were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTSOverall patients survival at 1 year was not significantly different among >or= 60 years old group (66%) and < 60 years group (76%). There were no differences in the operation time, the quantity of blood lost during operation, the days of hospitalization and the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis between the two groups. The incidence rate of acute rejection reaction in >or= 60 years old group was lower. Both the duration of staying in intensive care unit and the time of using ventilator in >or= 60 years old group were longer than the other group. Moreover, the incidence rates of infection and intracerebral hemorrhage were higher in >or= 60 years old group, which were the primary causes of death in this group.

CONCLUSIONEven though the complications were higher, recipients over 60 years old underwent OLT have more excellent 1 year survival.

Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; Length of Stay ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; methods ; mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo analyze the preoperative risk factors on liver transplant recipients with acute renal failure(ARF), and to evaluate renal replacement therapy (RRT) as a transitonary therapy before liver transplantation.

METHODSLiver transplant recipients with acute renal failure treated with renal replacement therapy between January 1st, 2001 and January 1st, 2008 in our center were retrospected. Clinical characteristics, the kinds of RRT and prognosis were analyzed; Logistic regression was applied to analyze the parameters that can forecast the motality of the liver transplant recipients with acute renal failure.

RESULTSOf the patients who received RRT, 30% survived to liver transplantation, 67.5% died while waiting for liver transplantation. The dead had a higher multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), and lower mean arterial pressure than those survived to liver transplantation. There was no significant difference in the duration of RRT between continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) patients and hemodialysis patients. CRRT patients had a higher MODS, lower mean arterial pressure, lower serum creatinine than hemodialysis patients. Lower mean arterial pressure was statistically associated with higher risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONThough mortality was high, RRT helps part (30%) of patients survive to liver transplantation. Therefore, considering the high mortality without transplantation, RRT is acceptable for liver transplant recipients with ARF.

Acute Kidney Injury ; etiology ; mortality ; therapy ; Adult ; Blood Pressure ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; adverse effects ; Liver, Artificial ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Regression Analysis ; Renal Dialysis ; methods ; Renal Replacement Therapy ; mortality ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Analysis

PURPOSE: Bacteremia is a major infectious complication associated with mortality in liver transplant recipients. The causative organisms and clinical courses differ between medical centers due to variations in regional bacterial epidemiology and posttransplant care. Further, living donors in Korea contribute to 83% of liver transplants, and individualized data are required to improve survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 104 subjects who had undergone living-donor liver transplant from 2005 to 2007. RESULTS: Among the 144 consecutive living-donor liver transplant recipients, 24% (34/144) developed bacteremia, 32% (46/144) developed non-bacteremic infections, and 44% (64/144) did not develop any infectious complications. Forty episodes of bacteremia occurred in 34 recipients. The major sources of bacteremia were intravascular catheter (30%; 12/40), biliary tract (30%; 12/40), and abdomen (22.5%; 9/40). Gram-positive cocci were more common (57.5%; 23/40) than Gram-negative rods (32.5 %; 13/40) and fungi (10%; 4/40). The data revealed that the following factors were significantly different between the bacteremia, non-bacteremic infection, and no infection groups: age (p = 0.024), posttransplant hemodialysis (p = 0.002), ICU stay (p = 0.012), posttransplant hospitalization (p < 0.0001), and duration of catheterization (p < 0.0001). The risk factors for bacteremia were older than 55 years (odds ratio, 6.1; p = 0.003), catheterization for more than 22 days (odds ratio, 4.0; p = 0.009), UNOS class IIA (odds ratio, 6.6; p = 0.039), and posttransplant hemodialysis (odds ratio, 23.1; p = 0.001). One-year survival rates in the bacteremic, non-bacteremic infection, and no infection groups were 73.2%, 91.3%, and 93.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early catheter removal and preservation of renal function should focus for improving survival after transplant.
Adult ; Bacteremia/etiology/*mortality ; Catheterization/adverse effects/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Korea/epidemiology ; Liver Transplantation/*mortality/statistics & numerical data ; Living Donors ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications/etiology/*mortality ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Factors ; Survival Analysis