Objective To investigate the changes and clinical significance of serum tumor markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer before and after gefitinib targeted therapy.Methods 80 cases of non-small cell lung cancer patients in our hospital from June 2015 to May 2017 were divided into control group and observation group randomly,40 cases in each group.The control group were treated with docetaxel conventional chemotherapy,and the observation group were treated with gefitinib targeted therapy.The clinical treatment effect,changes of serum tumor markers cancer antigen125 (CA125),carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA),neuron specific enolase (NSE) and adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results The effective rate and disease control rate of the observation group were higher than that in the control group,with statistically significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).The levels of serum tumor markers CA125,CEA and NSE in the control group and the observation group before treatment were not significantly different (P ＞ 0.05).After 1 months of treatment,the levels of serum tumor markers CA125,CEA and NSE in the two groups were all decreased,and the level of serum tumor markers,CA125,CEA and NSE in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,with statistically significant difference.The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P ＜ 0.05),with statistically significant difference.Conclusions Gefitinib is effective in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.It reduces the level of serum tumor markers CA125,CEA,NSE,and reduces postoperative adverse reactions.It is worthy of clinical application.

OBJECTIVETo compare the efficacy difference between acupotomy and acupuncture in the treatment of avascular necrosis of femoral head at the early and middle stages.

METHODSThe randomized controlled prospective study method was adopted. Sixty cases of avascular necrosis of femoral head at Ficat-ArletⅠto Ⅱ stages were randomized into an acupotomy group (32 cases) and an acupuncture group (28 cases) by the third part. In the acupotomy group, the acupotomy was adopted for the loose solution at the treatment sites of hip joint, once every two weeks, totally for 3 times. In the acupuncture group,points around the hip joint were selected and stimulated with warm acupuncture therapy, once every day, for 6 weeks. Harris hip score was observed before and after treatment. The efficacy was evaluated in the two groups.

RESULTSHarris hip score was improved significantly after treatment in the two groups (both<0.05). The result in acupotomy group was better than that in the acupuncture group (<0.05). The effective rate was 90.6% (29/32) in the acupotomy group, better than 75.0% (21/28) in the acupuncture group after treatment (<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSHarris hip score and the effective rate in the acupotomy group are better than those in the treatment with routine acupuncture for avascular necrosis of femoral head at the early and middle stages.