Objective To explore the mechanism of LMWH therapy for SAP.Methods 48 wistar rats were random divided into 3 groups,sham group(S group),severe acute pancreatitis group(SAP group)and LMWH therapy group(H group).Serum amylase,IL-6,acinar cell apoptosis and the activity of NF-κB were detected and compared.Results The expression of amylase and IL-6 in SAP group was significantly higher than that in H group(P＜0.01).The apoptosis index of acinar cell in SAP group wag significantly lower than that in H group(P＜0.01),while the activity of NF-κB in SAP groupwas stronger than that in H group.Conclusions LMWH therapy may ameliorate SAP by inducing acinar cell apoptosis through suppressing the activity of NF-κB.

Objective:To analyze the sleep quality before treatment and related risk factors of sleep disorder in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: Totally 143 patients first diagnosed as nasopharyngeal carcinoma were selected [ average age (43 ± 10) years, 100 males and 43 females] in a NPC ward of one hospital, the Chinese version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, total score ＞ 5 diagnosed as sleep disorder) was used to investigate the sleep quality before treatment, and the logistic regression analysis was used to analyze related factors of the sleep disorder before treatment Results: The rate of sleep disorder was 50.3％. The logistic regression analysis showed that age was a risk factor of sleep disorder before treatment in patients with NPC (OR = 1.04, 95％ CI: 1.01-1.08), while gender, culture degree, clinical stage, body mass index were not correlated with sleep disorder (Ps＞0.05). Conclusion: It suggests that patients with NPC may have a higher incidence of sleep disorder before treatment, and older patients may be more prone to pre-treatment sleep disorder.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of chronic urticaria (CU) patients with poor response to H1 antihistamines.Methods:CU patients, who showed poor response to H1 antihistamines and received omalizumab treatment, were collected from the Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from June 2020 to June 2021. The efficacy of omalizumab was evaluated by using the 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT) score at weeks 4, 12 and 24 after the start of treatment. The t-test, chi-square test, and Pearson correlation analysis were used to analyze the relationship between the clinical characteristics and efficacy. Results:A total of 121 CU patients who met the inclusion criteria and had relatively complete medical records were included in this study, including 54 males (44.63%) and 67 females (55.37%) , and their ages ranged from 13 to 70 years (39.88 ± 14.36 years) ; 88 patients were diagnosed with chronic spontaneous urticaria (72.73%) , 10 with chronic inducible urticaria (8.26%) , and 23 with chronic spontaneous urticaria accompanied by chronic inducible urticaria (19.01%) . At week 4 after the start of omalizumab treatment, the response rate was 50.86% (59/116) , and the complete response rate was 25.86% (30/116) ; at week 12, the response rate was 78.26% (54/69) , and the complete response rate was 34.78% (24/69) ; at week 24, the response rate was 64.71% (22/34) , and the complete response rate was 23.53% (8/34) . At week 4, CU patients with baseline serum total IgE levels of < 40 IU/ml had a lower response rate (26 cases, 30.77%) than those with baseline serum total IgE levels of ≥ 40 IU/ml (61 cases, 65.57%; χ2 = 8.93, P = 0.004) . Correlation analysis showed that the age at treatment, age at onset, allergic diseases, concomitant symptoms, baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rates, and baseline C-reactive protein levels were significantly correlated with the UCT scores (all P < 0.05) , while the course of disease, clinical types, serum total IgE levels, peripheral blood counts, dermatology life quality index scores, and UAS7 scores were not significantly correlated with the UCT scores. Among the 121 CU patients, 8 (6.61%) reported mild to moderate adverse reactions. Conclusion:Omalizumab could effectively improve clinical symptoms and signs of CU patients with poor response to H1 antihistamines, and was well tolerated;omalizumab treatment may be more beneficial to patients without allergic comorbidities such as allergic rhinitis, without concomitant symptoms such as angioedema, and with lower erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive protein levels.

Objective:To investigate the prognostic factors of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) after radical resection with different surgical approaches.Methods:The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 442 patients who were admitted to Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from February 2003 to July 2011 were collected. There were 362 males and 80 females, aged from 21 to 85 years, with a median age of 64 years. Patients underwent radical resection of AEG. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) follow-up; (3) progrostic factors analysis of AEG after radical resection; (4) survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach; (5) survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach; (6) survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ type AEG; (7) survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅲ AEG. Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative survival of patients up to June 2018. Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range). Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates and draw survival curves, and Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. Univariate analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was conducted using the COX proportional hazard model. Results:(1) Surgical situations: 442 patients underwent radical resection of AEG, including 204 via abdominal approach and 238 via thoracoabdominal approach. There were 391 patients with D 2 lymphadenectomy and 51 with D 2+ lymphadenectomy. (2) Follow-up: 442 patients were followed up for 8-162 months, with a median follow-up time of 37 months. All the 442 patients survived for 2-156 months, with a median survival time of 31 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates were 79.2%, 42.0%, 30.0%, respectively. (3) Prognostic factors analysis of AEG after radical resection: results of univariate analysis showed that tumor diameter, Lauren type, pathological T staging, pathological N staging, pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration were related factors for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG ( χ2=4.028, 4.885, 19.435, 17.014, 34.449, 9.707, 11.866, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration were independent influencing fators for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG ( hazard ratio=1.255, 0.486, 1.454, 95% confidence interval: 1.024-1.539, 0.325-0.728, 1.096-1.928, P<0.05). (4) Survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach: of the 204 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 83.6%, 50.4%, 37.8% for 121 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, respectively, versus 72.0%, 39.3%, 31.8% for 83 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=1.854, P>0.05). (5) Survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach: of the 238 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 79.6%, 38.8%, 23.8% for 183 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, respectively, versus 79.1%, 37.6%, 29.3% for 55 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=0.215, P>0.05). (6) Survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ AEG: of the 304 patients with Siewert typeⅡAEG, the postoperative 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 83.6%, 50.4%, 37.8% for 121 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, respectively, versus 79.6%, 38.8%, 23.8% for 183 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=2.406, P>0.05). (7) Survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅲ AEG: of the 138 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, the postoperative 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 72.0%, 39.3%, 31.8% for 83 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, respectively, versus 79.1%, 37.6%, 29.3% for 55 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=0.640, P>0.05). Conclusions:Pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration are independent fators for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG. Siewert types and surgical approach are not related factors for prognosis of patients after radical resection of AEG. There is no significant difference in the survival between patients with different Siewert types of AEG undergoing radical resection via different surgical approaches.