No abstract available.
Lipectomy*

No abstract available.
Lipectomy*

No abstract available.
Lipectomy* ; Ultrasonics*

Abdominoplasty ; Lipectomy

No abstract available.
Dermatitis* ; Granuloma* ; Lipectomy*

No abstract available.
Dermatitis* ; Granuloma* ; Lipectomy*

No abstract available.
Anesthesia, Local* ; Lipectomy* ; Male ; Penis*

We propose a safe, simple, and novel method to harvest fat using a standard liposuction cannula and a Redivac or alternative closed-suction drain. The authors have used this technique for both 'dry' and 'wet' liposuction. This technique is both easy to perform and cost-effective whilst providing both a silent and relatively atraumatic fat harvest. The lower negative pressure compared with traditional harvesting systems likely preserves fat integrity for lipofilling. This method maximises resources already held within a hospital environment.
Adipose Tissue ; Catheters ; Lipectomy ; Suction

This study was performed to compare the effect of external ultrasound assisted PAL(power assisted liposuction) with that of PAL alone. We performed 17 cases of liposuction from January 2003 to June 2003. For comparing both systems, we treated the right side(study group) with external ultrasound assisted PAL and the left side(control group) with PAL alone. To evaluate the difference in results between two groups, we surveyed three objective and four subjective items. Objectives were categorized as "Reduction rate of postoperative swelling", "Efficiency of suction" and "Histologic finding of aspirated fat tissue". Subjectives were also filed as "Degree of postoperative bruising", "Cannula resistance that operator felt", "Degree of postoperative pain" and "Patient's satisfaction". We assessed by questionnaire three times at 1day, 7 days and 30 days after operation. There were statistically significant differences in two of the subjective items; "Degree of postoperative pain at postoperative 1 day" and "Cannula resistance that operator felt". This study concludes that external ultrasound PAL is more effective high mobility of fat tissue and low tension of surrounding tissue. External ultrasound PAL will be more useful in case of large volume liposuction and revision procedures.
Lipectomy ; Pain, Postoperative ; Questionnaires ; Ultrasonography*

The gigantic lipoma could be categorized into subcutaneous and subfascial type. We experienced eight cases from seven patients. Five cases of them were proved to be subcutaneous gigantic lipomas, and three cases were proved to be subfascial gigantic lipomas. Among the subcutaneous type, three cases of liposarcomas were confirmed by final biopsy results. And three cases of recurrences were shown. Among the subfascial type, one case of chondrolipoma was confirmed by final biopsy result and no recurrence was not found. In brief, subcutaneous and subfascial gigantic lipoma had a specific characteristics as followings: Subcutaneous type showed asymptomatic mass with bulging, multilobulated and poorly marginated. And it was difficult for complete removal with a high recurrence rate. Radical excision and liposuction recommended for its treatment. On the other hand, subfascial type showed diffuse expansion, late onset of symptom. And it was readiness for complete removal with no recurrence after complete excision.
Biopsy ; Hand ; Humans ; Lipectomy ; Lipoma* ; Liposarcoma ; Recurrence