Objective To establish an assessment model of financial risk exposure for the county-levelpublic hospitals in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,which can be used to assess the risk exposure of the hospital in question,and as decision making reference for their financial management and risk prevention and control.Methods Using indicators standardized methods and entropy method to process 1 5 financial indicators (quantitative indicators and qualitative indicators )for the 20 public hospitals,and using the gray clustering method to assess financial risk exposure.Results 70% of the county-level public hospitals are faced with less financial risks,while four of them need to pay close attention,and two have large loopholes pending solution.Conclusions Entropy-Gray clustering methods can complement each other,as found in the study.This study proves its significance,and health authorities should establish their long-term financial risk control mechanisms.

Objective To explore the differences in the perceived benefits of carrying out telemedicine services between medical staff as invitees and inviters,and to provide theoretical basis and suggestions for optimizing telemedicine collaboration and benefit patterns.Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted with 997 medical staff around the roles and perceived benefits of telemedicine services,and correlation analysis,multivariate linear regression,univariate analysis of variance,and logistic regression were used to explore differences in medical staff's perceived benefits of conducting telemedicine services.Results Regarding the perceived benefit of reputation,the invited party believed that carrying out telemedicine services could publicize and enhance personal influence(OR=1.771),and could enhance the influence of hospital(OR=1.455),while the opposite was true for the invited party(OR=0.737).Regarding the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement,the invited parties believed that carrying out telemedicine services was not conducive to enhancing their personal capacity to diagnose and treat difficult cases(OR=0.651);and as an inviting party,they believed that it was conducive to the development of their hospital's discipline(OR=1.317).Conclusion The invited party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of reputation,while the inviting party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement.Both have complementary perceived benefits,but there may be a game of interests,so it is necessary to optimize the participation incentive mechanism,operation mechanism and performance evaluation mechanism of telemedicine services around the motivation of the invited party and the difficulties of the inviting party.

Objective To explore the differences in the perceived benefits of carrying out telemedicine services between medical staff as invitees and inviters,and to provide theoretical basis and suggestions for optimizing telemedicine collaboration and benefit patterns.Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted with 997 medical staff around the roles and perceived benefits of telemedicine services,and correlation analysis,multivariate linear regression,univariate analysis of variance,and logistic regression were used to explore differences in medical staff's perceived benefits of conducting telemedicine services.Results Regarding the perceived benefit of reputation,the invited party believed that carrying out telemedicine services could publicize and enhance personal influence(OR=1.771),and could enhance the influence of hospital(OR=1.455),while the opposite was true for the invited party(OR=0.737).Regarding the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement,the invited parties believed that carrying out telemedicine services was not conducive to enhancing their personal capacity to diagnose and treat difficult cases(OR=0.651);and as an inviting party,they believed that it was conducive to the development of their hospital's discipline(OR=1.317).Conclusion The invited party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of reputation,while the inviting party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement.Both have complementary perceived benefits,but there may be a game of interests,so it is necessary to optimize the participation incentive mechanism,operation mechanism and performance evaluation mechanism of telemedicine services around the motivation of the invited party and the difficulties of the inviting party.

Objective To explore the differences in the perceived benefits of carrying out telemedicine services between medical staff as invitees and inviters,and to provide theoretical basis and suggestions for optimizing telemedicine collaboration and benefit patterns.Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted with 997 medical staff around the roles and perceived benefits of telemedicine services,and correlation analysis,multivariate linear regression,univariate analysis of variance,and logistic regression were used to explore differences in medical staff's perceived benefits of conducting telemedicine services.Results Regarding the perceived benefit of reputation,the invited party believed that carrying out telemedicine services could publicize and enhance personal influence(OR=1.771),and could enhance the influence of hospital(OR=1.455),while the opposite was true for the invited party(OR=0.737).Regarding the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement,the invited parties believed that carrying out telemedicine services was not conducive to enhancing their personal capacity to diagnose and treat difficult cases(OR=0.651);and as an inviting party,they believed that it was conducive to the development of their hospital's discipline(OR=1.317).Conclusion The invited party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of reputation,while the inviting party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement.Both have complementary perceived benefits,but there may be a game of interests,so it is necessary to optimize the participation incentive mechanism,operation mechanism and performance evaluation mechanism of telemedicine services around the motivation of the invited party and the difficulties of the inviting party.

Objective To explore the differences in the perceived benefits of carrying out telemedicine services between medical staff as invitees and inviters,and to provide theoretical basis and suggestions for optimizing telemedicine collaboration and benefit patterns.Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted with 997 medical staff around the roles and perceived benefits of telemedicine services,and correlation analysis,multivariate linear regression,univariate analysis of variance,and logistic regression were used to explore differences in medical staff's perceived benefits of conducting telemedicine services.Results Regarding the perceived benefit of reputation,the invited party believed that carrying out telemedicine services could publicize and enhance personal influence(OR=1.771),and could enhance the influence of hospital(OR=1.455),while the opposite was true for the invited party(OR=0.737).Regarding the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement,the invited parties believed that carrying out telemedicine services was not conducive to enhancing their personal capacity to diagnose and treat difficult cases(OR=0.651);and as an inviting party,they believed that it was conducive to the development of their hospital's discipline(OR=1.317).Conclusion The invited party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of reputation,while the inviting party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement.Both have complementary perceived benefits,but there may be a game of interests,so it is necessary to optimize the participation incentive mechanism,operation mechanism and performance evaluation mechanism of telemedicine services around the motivation of the invited party and the difficulties of the inviting party.

Objective To explore the differences in the perceived benefits of carrying out telemedicine services between medical staff as invitees and inviters,and to provide theoretical basis and suggestions for optimizing telemedicine collaboration and benefit patterns.Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted with 997 medical staff around the roles and perceived benefits of telemedicine services,and correlation analysis,multivariate linear regression,univariate analysis of variance,and logistic regression were used to explore differences in medical staff's perceived benefits of conducting telemedicine services.Results Regarding the perceived benefit of reputation,the invited party believed that carrying out telemedicine services could publicize and enhance personal influence(OR=1.771),and could enhance the influence of hospital(OR=1.455),while the opposite was true for the invited party(OR=0.737).Regarding the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement,the invited parties believed that carrying out telemedicine services was not conducive to enhancing their personal capacity to diagnose and treat difficult cases(OR=0.651);and as an inviting party,they believed that it was conducive to the development of their hospital's discipline(OR=1.317).Conclusion The invited party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of reputation,while the inviting party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement.Both have complementary perceived benefits,but there may be a game of interests,so it is necessary to optimize the participation incentive mechanism,operation mechanism and performance evaluation mechanism of telemedicine services around the motivation of the invited party and the difficulties of the inviting party.

Objective To explore the differences in the perceived benefits of carrying out telemedicine services between medical staff as invitees and inviters,and to provide theoretical basis and suggestions for optimizing telemedicine collaboration and benefit patterns.Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted with 997 medical staff around the roles and perceived benefits of telemedicine services,and correlation analysis,multivariate linear regression,univariate analysis of variance,and logistic regression were used to explore differences in medical staff's perceived benefits of conducting telemedicine services.Results Regarding the perceived benefit of reputation,the invited party believed that carrying out telemedicine services could publicize and enhance personal influence(OR=1.771),and could enhance the influence of hospital(OR=1.455),while the opposite was true for the invited party(OR=0.737).Regarding the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement,the invited parties believed that carrying out telemedicine services was not conducive to enhancing their personal capacity to diagnose and treat difficult cases(OR=0.651);and as an inviting party,they believed that it was conducive to the development of their hospital's discipline(OR=1.317).Conclusion The invited party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of reputation,while the inviting party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement.Both have complementary perceived benefits,but there may be a game of interests,so it is necessary to optimize the participation incentive mechanism,operation mechanism and performance evaluation mechanism of telemedicine services around the motivation of the invited party and the difficulties of the inviting party.

Objective To explore the differences in the perceived benefits of carrying out telemedicine services between medical staff as invitees and inviters,and to provide theoretical basis and suggestions for optimizing telemedicine collaboration and benefit patterns.Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted with 997 medical staff around the roles and perceived benefits of telemedicine services,and correlation analysis,multivariate linear regression,univariate analysis of variance,and logistic regression were used to explore differences in medical staff's perceived benefits of conducting telemedicine services.Results Regarding the perceived benefit of reputation,the invited party believed that carrying out telemedicine services could publicize and enhance personal influence(OR=1.771),and could enhance the influence of hospital(OR=1.455),while the opposite was true for the invited party(OR=0.737).Regarding the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement,the invited parties believed that carrying out telemedicine services was not conducive to enhancing their personal capacity to diagnose and treat difficult cases(OR=0.651);and as an inviting party,they believed that it was conducive to the development of their hospital's discipline(OR=1.317).Conclusion The invited party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of reputation,while the inviting party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement.Both have complementary perceived benefits,but there may be a game of interests,so it is necessary to optimize the participation incentive mechanism,operation mechanism and performance evaluation mechanism of telemedicine services around the motivation of the invited party and the difficulties of the inviting party.

Objective To explore the differences in the perceived benefits of carrying out telemedicine services between medical staff as invitees and inviters,and to provide theoretical basis and suggestions for optimizing telemedicine collaboration and benefit patterns.Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted with 997 medical staff around the roles and perceived benefits of telemedicine services,and correlation analysis,multivariate linear regression,univariate analysis of variance,and logistic regression were used to explore differences in medical staff's perceived benefits of conducting telemedicine services.Results Regarding the perceived benefit of reputation,the invited party believed that carrying out telemedicine services could publicize and enhance personal influence(OR=1.771),and could enhance the influence of hospital(OR=1.455),while the opposite was true for the invited party(OR=0.737).Regarding the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement,the invited parties believed that carrying out telemedicine services was not conducive to enhancing their personal capacity to diagnose and treat difficult cases(OR=0.651);and as an inviting party,they believed that it was conducive to the development of their hospital's discipline(OR=1.317).Conclusion The invited party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of reputation,while the inviting party mainly focuses on the perceived benefits of capacity enhancement.Both have complementary perceived benefits,but there may be a game of interests,so it is necessary to optimize the participation incentive mechanism,operation mechanism and performance evaluation mechanism of telemedicine services around the motivation of the invited party and the difficulties of the inviting party.