INTRODUCTION: Analysis of risk factors can pave the way for reducing unscheduled hospital readmissions and improve resource utilisation. METHODS: This was a concurrent nested, mixed method study. Factors associated with patients readmitted within 30 days between 2011 and 2015 at the National University Hospital, Singapore (N=104,496) were examined. Fifty patients were sampled in 2016 to inform an embedded qualitative study. Narrative interviews explored the periods of readmissions and related experiences, contrasted against those of non-readmitted patients. RESULTS: Neoplastic disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-2.15), number of discharged medications (5 to 10 medications OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.29; ≥11 medications OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.66-1.95) and length of stay >7 days (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.36-1.58) were most significantly associated with readmissions. Other factors including number of surgical operations, subvention class, number of emergency department visits in the previous year, hospital bill size, gender, age, Charlson comorbidity index and ethnicity were also independently associated with hospital readmissions. Although readmitted and non-readmitted patients shared some common experiences, they reported different psychological reactions to their illnesses and viewed hospital care differently. Negative emotions, feeling of being left out by the healthcare team and perception of ineffective or inappropriate treatment were expressed by readmitted patients. CONCLUSION Patient, hospital and system-related factors were associated with readmissions, which may allow early identification of at-risk patients. Qualitative analysis suggested several areas of improvement in care including greater empowerment and involvement of patients in care and decision making.
Hospitals ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Patient Readmission ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of regular surveillance venography with or without percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in haemodialysis patients presenting with central venous occlusive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of haemodialysis patients who presented with central vein occlusion (CVO) and central vein stenosis (CVS) between January 2008 and December 2011 was performed. CVO and significant CVS were defined as 100% and >50% luminal narrowing, respectively. Upon successful angioplasty on first presentation, patients were followed up with regular surveillance venography within 3-6 months of the intervention and were re-treated when a significant stenosis or occlusion was demonstrated. Data on patient's demographics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, type of upper limb dialysis access, lesion characteristics and complications were collected. Technical success, primary patency and primary assisted patency were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with CVO and 77 patients with CVS were enrolled. The technical success of initial PTA was 77% and 73% for the CVO and CVS groups, respectively. The primary patency at 3 months was 65% and 55% for the CVO group and CVS group, respectively ( = 0.32). The primary assisted patency at 1 year was 88% and 99% for the CVO group and CVS group, respectively ( = 0.009). At 2 years, the primary assisted patency were 77% and 90%, respectively ( = 0.07). There was significant difference in the overall primary assisted patency ( = 0.048) between the CVO and CVS groups. CONCLUSION CVOs are more difficult to treat than CVS. High primary assisted patency rates can be achieved with surveillance venography, albeit at the expense of increased number of interventions. Further cost effectiveness studies need to be performed to study the true benefit of our surveillance programme.