1.Arthroscopic Resection of The Distal Clavicle With Concomitant Subacromial Decompression: A Case Series
HZ Chan ; CL Ooi ; MY Lim ; EKS Ong ; Zulkiflee O
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2014;8(2):59-62
Shoulder impingement syndrome and acromioclavicular
joint osteoarthritis often occur simultaneously and
easily missed. Kay et al. reported excellent results with
combined arthroscopic subacromial decompression and
resection of the distal end of the clavicle in patients with
both disorders1
. Arthroscopic treatment of these disorders
produces more favourable results than open procedures.
We report two patients who were not responding to
conservative management and were treated with direct
arthroscopic distal clavicle excision and subacromial
decompression in single setting. Both patients gained good
postoperative outcome in terms of pain score, function and
strength improvement assessed objectively with visual
analogue score (VAS) and University of California Los
Angeles Score (UCLA).
Osteoarthritis
2.Clinical Research Design and Biostatistical Methods.
Kijun SONG ; Mooyoung HAN ; My Young CHEONG ; Kil Seob LIM ; Dong Kee KIM
Korean Journal of Urology 2005;46(8):835-841
Purpose: To proceed effectively with clinical research requires an understanding of the fundamental principles of study design and biostatistical methods. In this article, we identified and summarized basic clinical research designs and some of the key biostatistical methods that have been commonly used in clinical research. Materials and Methods: In an observational study, cross-sectional, case- control and Cohort designs were illustrated and compared. In a clinical trial study, parallel group design and cross-over designs were described according to their characteristics. Also, the biostatistical methods for their usages classified and summarized. Results: Understanding and evaluating research design are part of the process researchers must use to determine both the quality and usefulness of their research. Adequate applications to biostatistical methods are need; i.e., descriptive statistics, Student's t-test, ANOVA, nonparametrics, categorical data analysis, correlation and regression, and survival analysis. Conclusions: Research findings are used by clinical researcher to guide their practice and reduce their uncertainty in clinical decision making. However, to understand how to interpret research results, it is important to be able to understand basic statistical concepts and types of study design. Clinicians should also appropriately choose the biostatistical methods to suit their purposes.
Biostatistics
;
Cohort Studies
;
Cross-Over Studies
;
Decision Making
;
Observational Study
;
Research Design*
;
Statistics as Topic
;
Uncertainty
3.Impact of Knowledge and Attitudes on Lifestyle Practices in Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Benson Wg ANG ; Mui Yee TAN ; Cheryl My GOH ; Sylwan RAHARDJA ; Beatrice Y LIM ; Wenqi CHIEW ; Thurston Yj HENG ; Kuang Ian TAN ; Jenies Hx FOO ; Sarah Zl THAM ; Jason Ks CHNG ; Wei Jie SEOW ; Nan LUO
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2019;48(8):247-263
INTRODUCTION:
Diabetes mellitus is a major public health issue in Singapore. To shape healthcare policies for the primary prevention of diabetes, it is crucial to understand Singaporeans' knowledge, attitudes and practices related to diabetes and its prevention. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and lifestyles of individuals without diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A cross-sectional household survey was performed between 31 January to 3 February 2019 to examine knowledge, attitudes and practices related to diabetes. Inclusion criteria of the participants included: 1) Singaporeans/permanent residents, 2) between 30 to 64 years old, and 3) who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes. Logistic and linear regression models were used to analyse the association of knowledge and attitudes with physical activity and diet habits, respectively.
RESULTS:
Among 806 participants, 72.2% did not meet the Health Promotion Board's physical activity recommendation. Physical activity was associated with better diabetes knowledge (odds ratio [OR] 5.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.65-17.53, = 0.049), stronger beliefs in diabetes prevention (OR 3.36, 95% CI = 1.02-11.12, = 0.047) and lower levels of worry about diabetes (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-1.00, = 0.049). Neither knowledge nor beliefs or worries about diabetes was associated with diet.
CONCLUSION
There is a need to reinforce the importance of physical activity and healthy diet in preventing diabetes. Although improving the knowledge level of diabetes may increase physical activity of the population, it is unlikely to improve dietary choices without effective behavior change interventions.