Propofol is limited in clinical use for induction of anesthesia, because of its high incidence of pain on injection. We sought to determine whether different methods could prevent this pain. 150 patients were allocated randomly into five groups. Group 1 was received room-air temperature propofol 2.5 mg/kg. Group 2 was received room-air temperature propofol 2.5 mg/kg mixed with 1 ml of 1%(10 mg) lidocaine. Group 3 was received room-air temperature propofol 2.5 mg/kg just after the injection of l ml of 1%(10 mg) lidocaine. Group 4 was received room-air temperature propofol 2.5 mg/kg mixed with 1 ml of 0.5%(5 mg) lidocaine. Group 5 was received propofol 2.5 mg/kg cooled to 0-4degrees C. The pain was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. All patients were questioned the degree of pain in an identical manner both at induction of anesthesia and as recalled in the recovery room. There was a significant reduction in the incidnce and severity of pain in the Groups 2 and 3, which were used 10 mg of lidocaine. But 23.3% of patients in the Group 2 and 30.0% of patients in the Group 3 still suffered unpleasant pain during the induction, and 20.0% and 26.7% of patients, respectively recalled in the recovery room. From the above results, we concluded that the pain from injection of propofol can be prevented by 1 ml of 1%(10 mg) lidocaine mixed with propofol or preinjection before propofol.
Administration, Intravenous* ; Anesthesia ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lidocaine ; Propofol* ; Recovery Room

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical value of lidocain in the treatment of tinnitus through three routes of administration (intravenous, intratympanic and acupoint injection) by analyzing literatures. METHOD: Articles were collected through Hownet, Wanfang, VIP, Pubmed, SciVerse ScienceDirect, Springer and OVID, etc. The articles were strictly evaluated based on their quality. The Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes by RevMan 5. 2 software. RESULT: A total of 16 articles with 1203 patients were enrolled in the analysis. Their tinnitus history ranged from 7 hours to 20 years. Assessment methods include tinnitus loudness levels, severity scales and subjective feelings. None of articles refer to maintaining time, instead of "short-term", "short" and so on. A total of 133 cases received intravenous injection and the effective rate was 73.4% (98 cases). 50 cases and 332 cases received intratympanic and acupoint injection respectively and their effective rates were 74.0% and 87.7%, respectively. The effective rate ranged from 42.4% to 58.3% in control group. Meta-analysis results indicate that all three routes of lidocaine administrations are more effective than conventional methods (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Different routes of lidocaine administration have a good but short time effects on the tinnitus control. It can effectively reduce the time of tinnitus habituation as a complementary treatment. But its value still needs further evaluation.
Humans ; Lidocaine ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Tinnitus ; drug therapy

OBJECTIVETo compare lidocaine tincture and microemulsion for their transdermal permeation.

METHODSThe experimental model for percutaneous administration of lidocaine preparations in vitro was prepared using modified Franz diffusion cell.

RESULTSThe accumulated infiltration amount of lidocaine microemulsion in unit area was higher than that in its cream or tincture preparations.

CONCLUSIONThe transdermal permeation of lidocaine microemulsion in vitro can be more efficient than that of the tincture preparation, and the permeation is linearly dependent on the dose administered within a certain range.

Administration, Cutaneous ; Anesthetics, Local ; administration & dosage ; Drug Compounding ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Emulsions ; administration & dosage ; Lidocaine ; administration & dosage ; Skin Absorption

In 2D surgical paients wihose general anesthsia was maintained with one to one ratio of oxygen and nirtous oxide and 1 vo19 of halothane, 1 mg/kg of lidocaine was administered to the 10 patients in each group intravenously to evaluate the effects of lidocaine on cardiovascular changes. In these clinical study, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) were measured iri one minute interval after intravenous administration of lidocaine and these values were compared with the control. The following results were obtained: 1) There are no significant changes of the heart rate. 2) The mean arerial pressure was significantly decreased one minute after that, there was no significant change. 3) There were no signifieant changes in the stroke volume. 4) The cardiac outit was significantly decreased in all patients after the administration of lidocaine and there were also the significant decrease of the cardiac output three and four minutes in patients with 1.0 mg/kg of lidocaine and four and five minutes in patients with 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine after the administration of lidocaine.
Administration, Intravenous ; Anesthesia* ; Arterial Pressure ; Cardiac Output ; Halothane* ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Lidocaine* ; Oxygen ; Stroke Volume

BACKGROUND: Intravenous injection of rocuronium is associated with withdrawal responses which are attributable to the pain from the injection of rocuronium. Several methods have been proposed to abolish and attenuate rocuronium-induced pain. We hypothesized priming dose of rocuronium could reduce withdrawal responses associated with administering a second large dose of rocuronium for tracheal intubation. We compared the efficacy of the priming dose technique of rocuronium with intravenous lidocaine as a pre-treatment for the prevention of withdrawal responses associated with rocuronium injection. METHODS: We recruited 150 patients aged between 18 and 60 years, ASA physical status 1 or 2, who were going to undergo elective surgery requiring general anesthesia. Patients were allocated into three groups. Group C received normal saline, Group L received lidocaine 1 mg/kg, and Group P received rocuronium 0.06 mg/kg 2 minutes before administering a second large dose of rocuronium for tracheal intubation. After the loss of consciousness, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered intravenously over 10 seconds for tracheal intubation. The withdrawal responses to the injection of rocuronium were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of withdrawal responses associated with rocuronium injection for tracheal intubation was 56, 50, 24% in group C, group L, and group P, respectively. The incidence of withdrawal responses was lower in group P than group C and group L, but there was no difference between group L and group C. CONCLUSIONS: Priming dose technique is a useful clinical method to alleviate withdrawal responses associated with rocuronium injection.
Administration, Intravenous ; Aged ; Androstanols ; Anesthesia, General ; Humans ; Incidence ; Injections, Intravenous ; Intubation ; Lidocaine ; Unconsciousness

PURPOSE: During transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, 65% to 90% of patients reportedly have discomfort. We compared the anesthetic effects of a periprostatic injection of lidocaine under ultrasound guidance with the effects of a rectal instillation of lidocaine gel before the transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized double-blind study was performed in 72 patients requiring a systematic biopsy of the prostate. Patients were randomized into two groups according to the method of anesthetic delivery that was used. Group 1 consisted of 37 patients who intrarectally received 10 ml of 2% lidocaine gel 10 minutes before biopsy, and 5 ml of normal saline was injected into the periprostatic nerve plexus just before biopsy under ultrasound guidance using an 18 gauge 16 cm needle on each side. Group 2 consisted of 35 patients who received 10 ml of sterile gel without lidocaine and a 5 ml 1% lidocaine injection using the same method as group 1. The pain score was assessed using a visual analogue scale immediately after biopsy. RESULTS: There was a statistical difference in the mean pain score between the two groups (5.1+/-1.7 in group 1 versus 3.3+/-1.5 in group 2) (p<0.001), but The complication rates were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that performing the transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade before biopsy significantly diminishes the discomfort associated with the procedure, which, in turn, improves patient tolerance more so than rectal instillation of lidocaine gel. In addition, this procedure is a safe, simple, and rapid technique that should be considered in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
Administration, Rectal* ; Anesthetics ; Biopsy* ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Lidocaine* ; Needles ; Nerve Block ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate* ; Ultrasonography*

Pediatric caudal anesthesia was done in 50 infants and children under 10 years of age, who were to undergo surgery of inguinal region. All cases were given 10mg/kg body weigh t of 1% lidocaine solution with epinephrine 1:200,000. The results were as follows: 1) Pediatric caudal anesthesia was simple, easy and reliable in technique. 2) Additional intravenous administration of Ketamine or pentothal sodium was needed. i.e., to provide a more cooperative state. 3) Anesthetic effect was judged very Excellent. 4) Cardiovascular and respiratory changes were minimal. Author's came to conclusion that caudal anesthesia for pediatric inguinal region surgery in reliable, simple in technique, favorable to surgeon, and is considered to be a good technique for pediatric anesthesia.
Administration, Intravenous ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Caudal* ; Anesthetics ; Child ; Epinephrine ; Humans ; Infant ; Ketamine ; Lidocaine ; Sodium ; Thiopental

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of 5% lidocaine patch in reducing propofol-induced pain and cannula-induced pain. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 126 patients were divided into one of three groups: pretreatment with a 5% lidocaine patch (Lidotop®) and premixed 2 ml of normal saline with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group A); pretreatment with a placebo patch and premixed 2 ml of normal saline with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group B); or pretreatment with a placebo patch and premixed 2 ml of 2% lidocaine (40 mg) with 1.5 mg/kg of 1% propofol (Group C) for induction of anesthesia. Pain severity was evaluated on a four-point verbal rating scale during intravenous cannulation, propofol injection, and 24 h after the operation (recall). RESULTS: Eighteen patients (47.4%) in Group A complained of cannula-induced pain compared with 35 (94.6%) in Group B and 36 (94.7%) in Group C (P < 0.001). Group A patients showed significantly lower incidence of propofol-induced pain and recall of propofol-induced pain compared with Group B (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01), whereas there was no difference compared with Group C. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative transdermal administration of 5% lidocaine patch is an effective and simple method in reducing propofol-induced pain as well as cannula-induced pain.
Administration, Cutaneous ; Anesthesia ; Catheterization ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lidocaine* ; Methods ; Propofol

AIMTo study the effect of lidocaine-dodecanol binary eutectic system on the transdermal permeation of lidocaine.

METHODSBinary eutectic mixture of different proportions of lidocaine and dodecanol were prepared and the patch containing the binary eutectic mixture was developed. The solubilities of pure lidocaine and lidocaine from the binary eutectic system were determined in pH 7.9 phosphate buffer. The transdermal flux of lidocaine from the patches containing the binary eutectic system and pure lidocaine were measured using Franz-type single diffusion cell.

RESULTSThe melting point of the lidocaine-dodecanol binary eutectic system was markedly lower than that of pure lidocaine. The steady state transdermal flux of lidocaine from the patch of the binary eutectic system was six times as much as that of pure lidocaine patch.

CONCLUSIONThe lidocaine-dodecanol binary eutectic system could produce high thermodynamic activity of the drug and the high driving force for transdermal permeation of lidocaine.

Administration, Cutaneous ; Anesthetics, Local ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Animals ; Dodecanol ; administration & dosage ; chemistry ; Drug Combinations ; Drug Stability ; Guinea Pigs ; Lidocaine ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Skin Absorption ; Solubility

This study describes the successful use of modified dorsolumbar epidural anesthesia with a fixed volume of anesthetic in a bovine referral center. Among the 130 Holstein cattle scheduled for flank surgery, 90 cattle received a mixed anesthetic consisting of 1 ml of xylazine hydrochloride and 3 ml of lidocaine hydrochloride by modified dorsolumbar epidural anesthesia. Eighteen cattle with dehydration and/or lameness received a mixed anesthetic containing 0.5 ml of xylazine and 3 ml of lidocaine. Infiltration anesthesia was performed in 22 cattle whose epidural space could not be reached in order to perform the flank surgery. The surgeries began about 12 min after the administration of the anesthetic and lasted for about 36 min. The modified method using a fixed volume of anesthetic was successfully introduced and effectively used in a bovine referral center. This modified method will allow veterinarians to save time and effort, thus lowering the cost of each surgery.
Anesthesia, Epidural/methods/*veterinary ; Anesthetics, Local/*administration & dosage ; Animals ; Cattle/*surgery ; Epidural Space ; Female ; Lidocaine/*administration & dosage ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Xylazine/*administration & dosage