1.Performance Verification of Analyzing IgG by Immune Nephelometry Assay
Bo ZHOU ; Xia FAN ; Lianshuang ZHAO ; Hui KANG
Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine 2015;(3):133-135
Objective To test and verify the performance of analyzing IgG using nephelometry assay,and discuss reasonable model of performance verification of this system.Methods According to related documents and standards,this study verified the precision,accuracy,assay measurement range(AMR)and reference interval.Results The within-run precision in low level was 2.24%,while it was 2.73% in high level.The overall precision in low level was 2.25%,while it was 2.68%.The relative bias between the results of analyzing the calibrator with a different lot from that used for calibrating and its concen-tration printed was 5.18%.The AMR of the original dilution was 2.44~33.5 g/L.The results of reference interval verifica-tion identified with what the manufactur declares.Conclusion The major performances of analyzing IgG by this system are identifies with the manufactur declares.The reference interval offered by the manufactur is acceptable.The verification and calculation methods are simple and convenient,with strong operability.
2.Prediction of tumor spread through air spaces of stage Ⅰ lung adenocarcinoma by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging signs combined with metabolic parameters
Zhaisong GAO ; Guangjie YANG ; Yuhui SUN ; Mingyu HOU ; Lianshuang XIA ; Xiaoxu LI ; Ju ZHANG ; Zhenguang WANG
Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2023;43(10):577-582
Objective:To investigate the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging signs and metabolic parameters in predicting tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) of stage Ⅰ lung adenocarcinoma. Methods:From January 2019 to December 2021, clinical, imaging and metabolic parameters of 381 patients (126 males, 255 females, age (61.2±9.2) years) with stage Ⅰ lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. According to the postoperative pathological results, patients were divided into STAS positive group and STAS negative group. According to the operation time, patients were divided into training set ( n=254) and verification set ( n=127). χ2 test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences of different parameters between patients with STAS positive and negative, and binary logistic regression analysis was used to select the predictors of STAS status. The prediction model was established, and ROC curve was used to evaluate the predictive efficacy. Results:There were 49(19.3%, 49/254) patients with STAS positive and 205(80.7%, 205/254) patients with STAS negative in the training set, while those were 35(27.6%, 35/127) and 92(72.4%, 92/127) in the verification set. In the training set, the differences of age ( z=-2.30, P=0.021), type of lesions ( χ2=6.81, P=0.009), spiculation ( χ2=12.64, P<0.001), bronchus truncation ( χ2=6.98, P=0.008), ground glass ribbon sign ( χ2=26.93, P<0.001) and SUV max ( z=-4.62, P<0.001) between the two groups were statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio ( OR)=1.048, 95% CI: 1.004-1.094, P=0.032), ground glass ribbon sign ( OR=3.857, 95% CI: 1.693-8.788, P=0.001) and SUV max ( OR=1.133, 95% CI: 1.001-1.282, P=0.049) were independent predictors of STAS status in stage Ⅰ lung adenocarcinoma patients. The logistic regression model was P=1/(1+ e - x), x=-5.292+ 0.480×age (year)+ 1.493×ground glass ribbon sign+ 0.170×SUV max. The AUCs of the model in the training set and verification set were 0.770 and 0.801, with the sensitivity of 81.6%(40/49) and 82.9%(29/35), and the specificity of 69.8%(143/205) and 65.2%(60/92), respectively. Conclusion:Age, ground glass ribbon sign and SUV max have good predictive effects on the occurrence of STAS in stage Ⅰ lung adenocarcinoma.