1.Treatment with a proximal femoral locking plate versus a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in older adult patients
Liancheng FEI ; Haiguo PAN ; Jinlei YU
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2023;30(3):375-378
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of a proximal femoral locking plate (LPFP) versus a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in older adult patients. Methods:A total of 130 older adult patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures who received treatment in Linghu People's Hospital of Huzhou from May 2017 to June 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo treatment with either a PFNA (observation group, n = 65) or an LPFP (control group, n = 65). Intraoperative blood loss, incision length, operative time, and time to fracture healing were determined in each group. At 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, the Harris hip score was used to evaluate hip joint recovery. Coxa vara, incision infection, and internal fixation loosening were compared between the two groups. Results:Intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group [(189.26 ± 48.15) mL vs. (96.47 ± 40.21) mL, t = -11.93, P < 0.001]. Incision length, operative time, and time to fracture healing in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(4.03 ± 1.48) cm vs. (12.16 ± 1.55) cm, (72.13 ± 28.75) minutes vs. (120.34 ± 29.01) minutes, (9.89 ± 1.52) weeks vs. (13.63 ± 1.74) weeks, t = -30.59, -9.52, -13.05, all P < 0.001]. At 1 month after surgery, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score between the two groups ( t = 1.28, P > 0.05). At 3 and 6 months after surgery, the Harris hip score gradually increased in the control and observation groups ( F = 13.44, 8.26, both P < 0.001). At 3 and 6 months after surgery, Harris hip scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group [(85.17 ± 4.29) points vs. (79.50 ± 4.12) points, (95.30 ± 1.04) points vs. (87.69 ± 1.25) points, t = 7.69, 37.73, both P < 0.001]. The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [1.54% (1/65) vs. 10.77% (7/65), χ2 = 4.80, P = 0.029). Conclusion:Compared with LPFP, PFNA can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss in older adult patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures, accelerate the progress of fracture healing, promote the recovery of the hip joint, and has fewer complications. Therefore, PFNA is worthy of popularization.
2.In-hospital mortality and influential factors of hip arthroplasty in older adult patients
Liancheng FEI ; Haiguo PAN ; Jinlei YU
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2022;29(7):1049-1053
Objective:To analyze the in-hospital mortality and influential factors of total hip arthroplasty (THR) in older adult patients.Methods:A total of 130 older adult patients subjected to THR in Department of Orthopedics, Huzhou Linghu People's Hospital between August 2019 and August 2021 were included in this study. In-hospital mortality was calculated. These patients were divided into death and survival groups according to whether they were dead or alive. Sex, age, smoking, drinking, disease type, complications, cardiovascular disease history, operation severity score, operative time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative osteoporosis treatment and postoperative rehabilitation training were compared between the two groups. The risk factors that influence in-hospital mortality were analyzed using logistic analysis method.Results:Among 130 patients, 9 patients died in Huzhou Linghu People's Hospital, with the mortality of 6.92%. Thus, there were 9 patients in the death group and 121 patients in the survival group. There were significant differences in age, smoking, complications, operation severity score and postoperative osteoporosis treatment between the two groups ( t = 1.70, χ2 = 5.48, χ2 = 4.09, t = 2.86, χ2 = 4.03, all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the age (≥ 85 years old), smoking (yes), complications (≥ 3), operation severity score (≥ 15 points) were the risk factors that influence in-hospital mortality. Postoperative osteoporosis treatment was the protective factor of THR. Conclusion:The in-hospital mortality of older adult patients after THR is high. Age ≥ 85 years old, smoking, complications ≥ 3, and operation severity score ≥ 15 are the risk factors of THR and may greatly affect the prognosis. More attention should be paid to older adult patients who have these risk factors.
3.Early Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA as a Potential Biomarker of Disease Recurrence in Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer
Xiaochen FEI ; Xinxing DU ; Yiming GONG ; Jiazhou LIU ; Liancheng FAN ; Jiayi WANG ; Yanqing WANG ; Yinjie ZHU ; Jiahua PAN ; Baijun DONG ; Wei XUE
Cancer Research and Treatment 2023;55(3):969-977
Purpose:
In non-metastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa) setting, it is important to early identify the patients at risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) for immediate postoperative intervention. Our study aimed to evaluate the potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for predicting disease recurrence.
Materials and Methods:
This real-world observational study evaluated 161 cases of nmPCa undergoing next-generation sequencing at our institution. A total of 139 ctDNA samples and 31 biopsied tumor tissue underwent genomic profiling. The study endpoint was BCR after radical prostatectomy. Relationships between the ctDNA status and the biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) were analyzed by log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression.
Results:
Of 161 enrolled patients, 19 (11.8%) harbored deleterious alterations in NCOR2, followed by BRCA2 (3.7%), ATR (2.5%), and CDK12 (2.5%). Of available pre-operative blood samples (n=139), ctDNA was detectable in 91 (65.5%). Until last follow-up, 56 of 68 patients (85.3%) with detectable ctDNA had achieved BCR, whereas only eight of 39 patients (20.5%) with undetectable ctDNA had achieved BCR. Patients who had undetectable ctDNA experienced significantly longer bPFS compared with those who had detectable ctDNA (not available vs. 8.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.14; p < 0.01). Pre-operative ctDNA status was a significant prognostic factor of disease recurrence.
Conclusion
Pre-operative ctDNA detection could identify patients at high risk of recurrence and has the potential to inform immediate postoperative interventions, but these approaches remain to be validated in prospective studies. ctDNA studies can provide insights into accurate monitoring and precise treatment rather than simply following routine clinical care.