1.Diagnostic performance of isolated-check visual evoked potential versus perimetry with blue-yellow in patients with open angle glaucoma
International Eye Science 2021;21(5):745-749
AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the isolated-checked visual evoked potential(IC-VEP)in the detection of open angle glaucoma and compared it to the blue-yellow perimetry(B/YP)and optical coherent tomography(OCT).
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, IC-VEP, perimetry and OCT were performed on 101 subjects(n=35, normal; n=30, early glaucoma; n=36, moderate and advanced glaucoma)from China. The sensitivity of IC-VEP, perimetry and OCT for detection of glaucoma, as well as the agreement within these 3 methods, were calculated to evaluate their clinic performance.
RESULTS: In the early primary open angle glaucoma(POAG)group the sensitivity of IC-VEP, blue-yellow perimetry and OCT were 70.00%, 70.00% and 63.33%, respectively. In the moderate advanced POAG group, the sensitivity of IC-VEP, OCT and blue-yellow perimetry were 86.11%, 88.89% and 91.67%, respectively. The specificity of IC-VEP was 91.43%. The results of IC-VEP were highly consistent with OCT and blue-yellow visual field tests(kappa: 0.721-1.000, P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:As an objective examination of visual function, IC-VEP can be used for early diagnosis of glaucoma. It may be a useful tool for monitoring the function of RGCs in suspected glaucoma patients.
2.Role of penehyclidine in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning
Shi-yuan Yu ; Yan-xia Gao ; Joseph Walline ; Xin Lu ; Li-na Zhao ; Yuan-xu Huang ; Jiang Tao ; An-yong Yu ; Na Ta ; Ren-ju Xiao ; Yi Li
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2020;11(1):37-47
BACKGROUND:
Penehyclidine is a newly developed anticholinergic agent. We aimed to investigate the role of penehyclidine in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning (OP) patients.
METHODS:
We searched the Pubmed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical literature (CBM) and Wanfang databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) recruiting acute OP patients were identified for meta-analysis. Main outcomesincluded cure rate, mortality rate, time to atropinization, time to 60% normal acetylcholinesterase (AchE) level, rate of intermediate syndrome (IMS) and rate of adverse drug reactions (ADR).
RESULTS:
Sixteen RCTs involving 1,334 patients were identified. Compared with the atropine-or penehyclidine-alone groups, atropine combined with penehyclidine significantly increased the cure rate (penehyclidine+atropine vs. atropine, 0.97 vs. 0.86, RR 1.13, 95% CI [1.07–1.19]; penehyclidine+atropine vs. penehyclidine, 0.93 vs. 0.80, RR 1.08, 95% CI [1.01–1.15]) and reduced the mortality rate (penehyclidine+atropine vs. atropine, 0.015 vs. 0.11, RR 0.17, 95% CI [0.06–0.49]; penehyclidine+atropine vs. penehyclidine, 0.13 vs. 0.08, RR 0.23, 95% CI [0.04–1.28]). Atropine combined with penehyclidine in OP patients also helped reduce the time to atropinization and AchE recovery, the rate of IMS and the rate of ADR. Compared with a single dose of atropine, a single dose of penehyclidine also significantly elevated the cure rate, reduced times to atropinization, AchE recovery, and rate of IMS.
CONCLUSION
Atropine combined with penehyclidine benefits OP patients by enhancing the cure rate, mortality rate, time to atropinization, AchE recovery, IMS rate, total ADR and duration of hospitalization. Penehyclidine combined with atropine is likely a better initial therapy for OP patients than atropine alone.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail