1.Could fecal calprotectin enter mainstream use for diagnosing and monitoring inflammatory bowel disease?.
Intestinal Research 2016;14(4):293-294
No abstract available.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases*
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex*
2.Could fecal calprotectin enter mainstream use for diagnosing and monitoring inflammatory bowel disease?.
Intestinal Research 2016;14(4):293-294
No abstract available.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases*
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex*
3.Optimal Usage of Fecal Calprotectin for Intestinal Diseases.
Korean Journal of Medicine 2018;93(4):364-368
No abstract available.
Intestinal Diseases*
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex*
4.Fecal Immunochemical Test and Fecal Calprotectin Measurement Are Noninvasive Monitoring Tools for Predicting Endoscopic Activity in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.
Ji Young CHANG ; Jae Hee CHEON
Gut and Liver 2018;12(2):117-118
No abstract available.
Colitis, Ulcerative*
;
Humans
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex*
;
Ulcer*
5.Home-based fecal calprotectin test is expected to play an important role in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Intestinal Research 2018;16(4):507-508
No abstract available.
Humans
;
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases*
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex*
7.The Usefulness of Fecal Calprotectin in Differentiating between Functional and Organic Bowel Diseases: Application in Pediatric Constipation Patients.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;62(5):261-262
No abstract available.
Constipation/*diagnosis
;
Female
;
Hirschsprung Disease/*diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex/*analysis
;
Male
8.Adalimumab induction and maintenance therapy achieve clinical remission and response in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease.
Kai Chun WU ; Zhi Hua RAN ; Xiang GAO ; Minhu CHEN ; Jie ZHONG ; Jian Qiu SHENG ; Michael A KAMM ; Simon TRAVIS ; Kori WALLACE ; Nael M MOSTAFA ; Marisa SHAPIRO ; Yao LI ; Roopal B THAKKAR ; Anne M ROBINSON
Intestinal Research 2016;14(2):152-163
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This was a Phase 2 study (NCT02015793) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of adalimumab in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Thirty, adult Chinese patients with CD (CD Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450; high-sensitivity [hs]-C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥3 mg/L) received double-blind adalimumab 160/80 mg or 80/40 mg at weeks 0/2, followed by 40 mg at weeks 4 and 6. An open-label extension period occurred from weeks 8-26; patients received 40 mg adalimumab every other week. Serum adalimumab concentration and change from baseline in fecal calprotectin (FC) were measured during the double-blind period. Clinical remission (CDAI <150), response (decrease in CDAI ≥70 points from baseline), and change from baseline in hs-CRP were assessed through week 26. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing categorical data and last observation carried forward for missing hs-CRP/FC values. No formal hypothesis was tested. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Mean adalimumab serum concentrations during the induction phase were 13.9-18.1 µg/mL (160/80 mg group) and 7.5-9.5 µg/mL (80/40 mg group). During the double-blind period, higher remission/response rates and greater reductions from baseline in hs-CRP and FC were observed with adalimumab 160/80 mg compared to that with 80/40 mg. Adverse event rates were similar among all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab serum concentrations in Chinese patients with CD were comparable to those observed previously in Western and Japanese patients. Clinically meaningful remission rates and improvement in inflammatory markers were achieved with both dosing regimens; changes occurred rapidly with adalimumab 160/80 mg induction therapy. No new safety signals were reported.
Adult
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group*
;
Crohn Disease*
;
Humans
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex
;
Pharmacokinetics
9.Role of fecal calprotectin in the diagnosis of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: a Meta analysis.
Yan-Qiu XIE ; Chang-Jun REN ; Xiong WANG ; Shu-Wen XIANG ; Xiao-Xing WANG ; Ling HAO
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2021;23(4):381-389
OBJECTIVE:
To study the value of fecal calprotectin (FC) in the diagnosis of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) through a Meta analysis.
METHODS:
Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Weipu Periodical Database, Wanfang Data, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched for related studies published up to May 2020, with manual search as supplementation. The QUADAS criteria were used to evaluate the quality of the articles included. Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 15.0 software were used to perform the Meta analysis, including the evaluation of specificity, sensitivity, likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. The sensitivity analysis and heterogeneity testing were performed, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and Fagan diagram were plotted.
RESULTS:
A total of 15 articles were enrolled, involving 1 719 neonates. Among these articles, 4 had low quality, 2 had high quality, and the rest had medium quality. There was high heterogeneity between studies, and there was no threshold effect or publication bias. The random effects model analysis showed that FC had a pooled specificity of 0.80 (95%
CONCLUSIONS
FC has high potential and efficiency in the early diagnosis of NEC. FC measurement can be used for the diagnosis of NEC, but it should be combined with clinical manifestations and other related laboratory examinations.
China
;
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/diagnosis*
;
Feces
;
Humans
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex
;
ROC Curve
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
10.Fecal Immunochemical Test and Fecal Calprotectin Results Show Different Profiles in Disease Monitoring for Ulcerative Colitis.
Sakiko HIRAOKA ; Toshihiro INOKUCHI ; Asuka NAKARAI ; Shiho TAKASHIMA ; Daisuke TAKEI ; Yuusaku SUGIHARA ; Masahiro TAKAHARA ; Keita HARADA ; Hiroyuki OKADA ; Jun KATO
Gut and Liver 2018;12(2):142-148
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Both fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and fecal calprotectin (Fcal) results are useful biomarkers for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the situations in which each marker should be used are largely unknown. METHODS: A total of 110 colonoscopy intervals of UC patients were assessed, and correlations between changes in colonoscopic findings and changes in the two aforementioned fecal markers were examined. RESULTS: Among patients with mucosal healing (MH) and negative FIT or Fcal results at the initial colonoscopy, FIT and Fcal findings exhibited accuracies of 93% (38/41) and 79% (26/33), respectively, for predicting the results of the subsequent examination. Among the 24 patients who showed endoscopic activity at the precedent colonoscopy and MH at the subsequent examination, positive-to-negative conversion of FIT and Fcal findings at the subsequent examination was observed in 92% (12/13) and 62% (8/13) of patients, respectively. Among the 43 patients who showed endoscopic activity at both the precedent and subsequent examinations, Fcal findings reflected the change in endoscopic activity better than FIT results (r=0.59, p<0.0001 vs r=0.30, p=0.054). CONCLUSIONS: The FIT is useful for confirming MH and the occurrence of relapse. In contrast, Fcal is useful for monitoring the mucosal status of patients with active inflammation.
Biomarkers
;
Colitis
;
Colitis, Ulcerative*
;
Colonoscopy
;
Humans
;
Inflammation
;
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex*
;
Recurrence
;
Ulcer*