Adolescent ; Adult ; Eye Injuries ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Lens Capsule, Crystalline ; Lens, Crystalline ; surgery ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Vitrectomy ; methods

An isolated rupture of the posterior capsule that is caused by a blunt ocular trauma has been rarely reported and is usually detected incidentally during surgery for a complicated cataract. We found an isolated posterior capsule rupture on the third day after trauma in a 25-year-old man who was admitted for the treatment of traumatic hyphema and we performed a phacoemusification and anterior vitrectomy with PC-IOL, implantation because of the traumatic cataract which had progressed after the injury. The PC-IOL was implanted safely into the capsular bag without severe enlargement of the posterior capsular rupture. The break seems to function as a capsulotomy which provides a clear visual axis. We report this case with a review of the literatures.
Adult ; Case Report ; Cataract/*etiology ; Eye Injuries/*complications ; Human ; Lens Capsule, Crystalline/*injuries ; Male ; Rupture/etiology ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating/*complications

PURPOSE: In this study, we examined the stability of the lens-angle supporter (LAS) for accommodation restoration by comparing intraocular lens (IOL) location, after-cataract and ciliary body damage after cataract surgery in rabbits. METHODS: Eight rabbits were divided into experimental and control groups of four rabbits each. Phacoemulsification and irrigation and aspiration were performed in all rabbits. This was followed by an LAS and IOL insertion in the four experimental rabbits. In the four control rabbits, only an IOL insertion was performed. Six months after the surgery, the location of the IOL, the conditions of the lens capsule and ciliary body were evaluated using a slitl-amp examination and Miyake-Apple view. RESULTS: For the experimental group, the ultrasound biomicroscope results showed normal LAS and IOL positioning in all four cases. According to the slitlamp examination and Miyake-Apple view, the IOL was positioned at the center, with less after-cataract and damage to the ciliary body. For the control group, ultrasound biomicroscope results indicated a higher IOL position than normal, as well as a single case of IOL decentering. According to the slit-lamp examination and Miyake-Apple view, the IOL was decentered with more severe after-cataract and ciliary body damage. CONCLUSIONS: The LAS has the potential to maintain a stable IOL position while producing less after-cataract when used in lens-angle reconstruction for correction of presbyopia. Moreover, LAS implantation incurs less damage to the ciliary body.
Accommodation, Ocular/physiology ; Animals ; Anterior Eye Segment ; Ciliary Body/injuries ; Disease Models, Animal ; Eye Injuries/*surgery ; Lens Capsule, Crystalline/*surgery ; *Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Microscopy, Acoustic ; *Phacoemulsification ; Rabbits ; *Reconstructive Surgical Procedures

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of 20 pseudophakic retinal detachment (RD) patients (20 eyes) and 17 aphakic RD patients (17 eyes). Males were predominated in both groups. The time interval between cataract extraction and RD was 31 months on average in the pseudophakic group, 32 months with intact posterior capsule and 27 months with ruptured posterior capsule, and 148 months in the aphakic group. In 50% of cases with ruptured posterior capsule in the pseudophakic group, RD occurred within 1 year. The anatomic success rate was 95% in the pseudophakic group and 88% in the aphakic group. The most common cause of failure was the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Visual acuities more than 20/40 after RD surgery were found in 13 pseudophakic (65%) and 6 aphakic (36%) eyes. Aphakic patients were more inclined to have silent RD than pseudophakic patients because of their poor visual acuity. Post-operative follow-up is required especially for the first 1 year in cases of damaged posterior capsule due to the high incidence of RD during this period.
Adult ; Aphakia, Postcataract/*etiology/surgery ; Comparative Study ; Female ; Humans ; Lens Capsule, Crystalline/injuries ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Phacoemulsification/*adverse effects ; Pseudophakia/*etiology/surgery ; Retinal Detachment/*etiology/surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: Ocular perforation during lid anesthesia is rarely reported. We describe here a case of inadvertent corneal perforation and traumatic cataract that occurred during lid anesthesia in a procedure for hordeolum removal. METHODS: A 33-year-old woman presented with a sudden visual loss of her left eye. She had undergone hordeolum removal the day before at a local clinic. On ophthalmologic examination, the cornea was perforated and the lens cortex was extruded into the anterior chamber. After cataract removal and IOL implantation, antibiotics were injected into the vitreous. RESULTS: Her final visual acuity of the left eye was 20/20. Postoperative specular microscopic examination revealed a normal-range endothelial cell count, coefficient of variation, and hexagonality despite the intracameral lidocaine injection. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthetic injection of an infected lid should be done with great caution. Although there are possibilities of corneal endothelial toxicity and endophthalmitis in case of intracameral lidocaine injection through the infected lid, yet proper management may save the patient's vision without complications.
Lidocaine/administration & dosage ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Lens Capsule, Crystalline/injuries ; Injections/adverse effects ; Humans ; Hordeolum/*surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Female ; Eyelids ; Eyelid Diseases/*surgery ; Eye Injuries, Penetrating/diagnosis/*etiology/surgery ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Cornea/injuries ; Cataract Extraction ; Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage ; Anesthesia, Local/*adverse effects ; Adult

INTRODUCTIONThe aim of this study was to determine if racial differences exist in the rate of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during cataract surgery in Singapore.

MATERIALS AND METHODSAll intraoperative complications during cataract surgery were prospectively reported as part of a clinical audit programme. A retrospective review of all patients who sustained a PCR during cataract surgery between July 1995 and December 1998 was performed.

RESULTSOf 8230 consecutive eyes which underwent cataract surgery, 6951 (84.5%) were Chinese, 597 (7.3%) were Malay, 524 (6.4%) were Indian, and 158 (1.9%) were of other races. The overall incidence of PCR was 1.9%. The PCR rates were 1.8% [125 of 6951; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.49 to 2.11] in Chinese, 2.0% (12 of 597; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.57) in Malay, 2.7% (14 of 524; 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.56) in Indian, and 2.5% (4 of 158; 95% CI, 0.00 to 4.98) in other races. There was no statistical difference between the PCR rates (P = 0.62, chi-square test).

CONCLUSIONRacial differences in Singapore do not have an effect on the rates of PCR during cataract surgery.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; genetics ; Capsulorhexis ; adverse effects ; Cataract Extraction ; adverse effects ; Eye Injuries ; ethnology ; etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intraoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Lens Capsule, Crystalline ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; adverse effects ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Middle Aged ; Phacoemulsification ; adverse effects ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture ; ethnology ; etiology ; Singapore ; epidemiology