1.Imaging Findings of Common Benign Renal Tumors in the Era of Small Renal Masses: Differential Diagnosis from Small Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Korean Journal of Radiology 2015;16(1):99-113
The prevalence of small renal masses (SRM) has risen, paralleling the increased usage of cross-sectional imaging. A large proportion of these SRMs are not malignant, and do not require invasive treatment such as nephrectomy. Therefore, differentation between early renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and benign SRM is critical to achieve proper management. This article reviews the radiological features of benign SRMs, with focus on two of the most common benign entities, angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma, in terms of their common imaging findings and differential features from RCC. Furthermore, the role of percutaneous biopsy is discussed as imaging is yet imperfect, therefore necessitating biopsy in certain circumstances to confirm the benignity of SRMs.
Abdominal Fat/pathology
;
Adenoma, Oxyphilic/diagnosis/radiography/ultrasonography
;
Angiomyolipoma/diagnosis/radiography/ultrasonography
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/*diagnosis/radiography/ultrasonography
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Humans
;
Kidney Neoplasms/*diagnosis/*radiography/ultrasonography
;
Leiomyoma/diagnosis/radiography/ultrasonography
2.A calcified tumour in the pelvis.
Sheng Hsiang LIN ; Hsiao Li LO
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2011;40(12):546-547
3.Esophageal Leiomyoma: Radiologic Findings in 12 Patients.
Po Song YANG ; Kyung Soo LEE ; Soon Jin LEE ; Tae Sung KIM ; In Wook CHOO ; Young Mog SHIM ; Kwhanmien KIM ; Yookyung KIM
Korean Journal of Radiology 2001;2(3):132-137
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to describe and compare the radiologic findings of esophageal leiomyomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The chest radiographic (n = 12), esophagographic (n = 12), CT (n = 12), and MR (n = 1) findings of surgically proven esophageal leiomyomas in 12 consecutive patients [ten men and two women aged 34 - 47 (mean, 39) years] were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The tumors, surgical specimens of which ranged from 9 to 90 mm in diameter, were located in the upper (n = 1), middle (n = 5), or lower esophagus (n = 6). In ten of the 12 patients, chest radiography revealed the tumors as mediastinal masses. Esophagography showed them as eccentric, smoothly elevated filling defects in 11 patients and a multilobulated encircling filling defect in one. In 11 of the 12 patients, enhanced CT scans revealed a smooth (n = 9) or lobulated (n = 2) tumor margin, and attenuation was homogeneously low (n = 7) or iso (n = 4). In one patient, the tumor signal seen on T2-weighted MR images was slightly high. CONCLUSION: Esophageal leiomyomas, located mainly in the middle or distal esophagus, are consistently shown by esophagography to be mainly eccentrically elevated filling defects and at CT, lesions showing homogeneous low or isoattenuation are demonstrated.
Adult
;
Comparative Study
;
Esophageal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/radiography
;
Esophagus/pathology
;
Female
;
Human
;
Leiomyoma/*diagnosis/radiography
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Male
;
Middle Age
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed