Based on the analysis on protections of civil rights in public health crises, this paper reviewed some related issues about the right of life, personal liberty, etc. It was found that the system of emergency laws was not perfect, and the articles about basic civil rights protections among different laws was inconsistent, we are also lack of a comprehensive management department to coordinate crisis response. The government should perfect laws and adjust management functions to protect citizens’ legitimate rights.

Objective To report the clinical results of surgical treatment of fracture of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid process in terrible triad injury.Methods Of the 59 patients with terrible triad injury of the elbow,17 were surgically treated for fracture of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid process from July 2010 to July 2014.They were 12 men and 5 women,from 29 to 70 years of age (average,50 years).By the Mason classification for the radial head fractures,2 cases were type Ⅰ,13 type Ⅱ and 2 type Ⅲ;by the O'Driscoll classification for coronoid process fractures,one was type Ⅰ,14 were type Ⅱ and 2 type Ⅲ.All patients were treated through combined approaches.The lateral Kocher approach was used to fixate or replace the radial head and to repair the lateral ligament complex;the anteromedial approach was used to fixate the coronoid process fracture and to explore and repair the medial collateral ligament if necessary.Fracture union,implant loosening,ectopic ossification,regression and articular alignment were assessed on the postoperative X-rays.At final follow-ups,the elbow function was evaluated using Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and Broberg & Morrey grading system for traumatic arthritis.Results The average follow-up duration for the 17 patients was 32 months (range,from 24 to 60 months).Final follow-ups showed that the mean arc of flexion-extension was 97° (from 70° to 120°),the mean extension limitation 23° (from 0 to 40°),the mean arc of forearm rotation 139° (from 90° to 145°),the mean pronation 71° (from 60° to 90°)and the mean supination 67° (from 60° to 85°).The MEPT scores averaged 87 points (from 80 to 100 points),yielding 7 excellent,8 good and 2 fair cases.By the Broberg & Morrey grading,there were 4 cases of grade 1 and one of grade 2.No evidence of elbow instability,nonunion or implant failure was found.Ectopic ossification around the elbow happened in 4 cases,transient ulnar nerve palsy was found in one,and the Kirschner wire was removed operatively in 2 because it had loosened after fracture union.Conclusion The treatment of anteromedial coronoid fractures in terrible triad injury should be anatomically reduced through direct exposure and fixated rigidly.

Objective To explore the classification system and outcomes of surgical treatment for terrible triad of the elbow.Methods Data of 42 patients with terrible triad elbow injuries who were surgically treated between 2009 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 29 males and 13 females with a mean age of 47 years at the time of injury.42 patients of terrible triad injuries were classified into four types:type ⅠA,ⅠB,Ⅱ,Ⅲ,and Ⅳ injuries.Type ⅠA and Ⅱ injuries were treated through an isolated lateral approach,while type ⅠB,Ⅲ and Ⅳ injuries were treated by a combined lateral and anteromedial approach.Operative treatment consisted of repair or replacement of the radial head,repair of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and coronoid fracture fixation.Type ⅠA injuries were treated with radial head and LCL repair without coronoid fixation.Type Ⅳ elbow injuries were treated with medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair.Elbow functional status was evaluated using the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS).Results There were three patients with type ⅠA injuries,7 patients type ⅠB injuries,15 type Ⅱ injuries,10 type Ⅲ injuries,and 7 type Ⅳ injuries.The average follow-up period was 30 months (range,24-56 months).All fractures of coronoid got union at average 11.5 months except for type ⅠA injuries.40 patients with fractures of radial head got union at average 12.4 months and two patients underwent radial head replacement without loosening.The mean flexion-extension arc was 107°±22°,the mean flexion contracture was 20°±10° and the mean flexion was 127°±14°.The average forearm rotation arc was 145°±14°,which included an average pronation of 73°±8° and an average supination of 71°±9°.The mean MEPS was 89±9 points (range,55-100 points),with excellent results in 24 elbows,good result in 17 and poor result in one;the excellence rate was 97％ (41/42).Thirteen patients had radiographic signs of arthrosis according to the Broberg-Morrey system (9 elbows were grade 1 and 4 were grade 2).5 patients had evidence of heterotopic ossification,of which four had minimal periarticular ossification and did not require additional surgery.The remaining patient showed significant heterotopic ossification and required an elbow release.1 patient with type Ⅲ injury developed transient median nerve paralysis and got full recovery after conservative treatment for 8 weeks.1 patient with type Ⅲ injury developed ulnar neuropathy and required an anterior ulnar nerve transposition.2 patients,who had shifting hardware but still achieved union,required a second surgery to remove the implant:one patient had a Kirschner wire shift from the radial head at 6 months after surgery,and the other had a loose screw in the coronoid process at one year after surgery.Conclusion Our classification system of terrible triad of the elbow may provide a guide for the selection of an ideal surgical approach and treatment modality.

Objective:To compare the effects of 3 spatial locations of the screw at the injured vertebra on the vertebral height in AO type A thoracolumbar fracture.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed of the 156 patients with type A thoracolumbar fracture who had been hospitalized at Department of Spine Surgery, The Sixth Hospital of Ningbo from January 2016 to June 2019. They were divided into 3 groups according to the spatial location of the screw at the injured vertebra. In group A of 55 cases, the screws were located in the vertebral body between the longitudinal axis bisector of the vertebral pedicle and the upper endplate; in group B of 52 cases, the screws were located in the vertebral body between the vertical axis bisector of the vertebral pedicle and the horizontal line of the apex of the inferior pedicle notch; in group C of 49 cases, the screws were located in the vertebral body between the horizontal line at the apex of the inferior pedicle notch and the inferior endplate. The anterior, middle and posterior heights of the injured vertebra, Beck index and angulation of the injured vertebra at preoperation, one week postoperation and the last follow-up were compared between the 3 groups and within the same group.Results:There was no significant difference in preoperative general data between the 3 groups, showing comparability ( P>0.05). In all the 3 groups, the anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebra and Beck indexes at one week postoperation and at the last follow-up were significantly larger than those before operation while the angulations of the injured vertebra at one week postoperation and at the last follow-up were significantly smaller than the preoperative values (all P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between one week postoperation and the last follow-up in any of the above indexes ( P>0.05). In all the patients, the posterior height of the injured vertebra at one week postoperation was significantly larger than those before operation and at the last follow-up ( P<0.05), but there was no such a significant difference in comparison between preoperation and the last follow-up ( P>0.05). At the last follow-up, groups A and B had significantly larger anterior and middle heights of the injured vertebra and Beck indexes but significantly smaller angulations of the injured vertebra than group C, but such significant differences did not exist when the above indexes were compared between groups A and B ( P>0.05). Conclusions:In insertion into an injured vertebra, the screw should be parallel and close to the upper endplate, and located in the middle and upper part of the vertebra corresponding to the longitudinal axis of the vertebral pedicle, because this spatial position is conducive to intraoperative reduction, maintaining the postoperative height of the injured vertebra, and decreasing loss of the vertebral height.

Objective:To determine the biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.Methods:After nonlinear finite element models of the intact upper cervical spine (C0-3) were constructed and validated, they were processed into 3 kinds with normal axis anatomy, a high-riding vertebral artery and a thin axis lamina, re-spectively.In the models, the odontoid fracture stabilized by atlantoaxial fixation and the atlas fracture sta-bilized by occipitocervical fixation were simulated.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (pedicle screw group); in the occipitocervical fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+occipital screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+occipital screws (pedicle screw group).Three different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws (horizontal, oblique and vertical) were applied.The range of motion (ROM) was measured in extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of occipitocervical bodies (C0-C3) after internal fixation.Results:Compared with the intact models, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were obviously reduced in the spinous process screw group and the pedicle screw group in the models with atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were greater in the spinous process screw group than in the pedicle screw group; in the occipitocervical fixation, the spinous process screw group had greater ROM of lateral flexion of C1-C2 and greater ROM of rotation of C0-C2 than the pedicle screw group.There were unobvious differences in insertion of spinous process screws between the horizontal, oblique and vertical techniques.Conclusions:In the atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations, the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw can provide as fine stability as the bilateral axis pedicle screws.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.In the occipitocervical fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 in lateral flexion and rotation than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw. The 3 different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws lead to an unobvious difference in the stability of C1-C2.

Objective To explore the present human resources and problems at community health centers in Shandong province .Methods PPS sampling method was used to extract data of 333 community health centers in 17 cities in Shandong province in 2015 .Then the human resource status was analyzed and evaluated by descriptive research indexes .Results Data showed that 333 community health centers had 19809 employees ,and 12271 of them having staffing quota. These employees include 6355 physicians ,5169 nurses ,and 3064 medical and pharmaceutical technicians .For the physicians ,4841 of them are medical practitioners ,1313 were assistant medical practitioners ,while the numbers of obstetricians and gynecologists ,general practitioners ,and TCM practitioners were 756 , 2124 and 432 respectively .Conclusions These community health service centers are faced with such problems as lack of human resources ,irrational personnel makeup ,and obvious shortage of public health ,general practitioners and medical/pharmaceutical professionals. It is recommended to increase and optimize manpower by means of motivating existing personnel ,introducing new manpower and training opportunities for the retention.Medical alliances are expected to encourage more high-end professionals to the primary institutions .

FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) has garnered considerable attention globally in recent years. Compared to conventional radiotherapy, FLASH-RT can deliver the total radiation dose to the target volume in an extremely short time, reducing the radiation-induced damage to normal tissue while maintaining similar anti-tumor effects. FLASH-RT has been in the clinical trial stage, with several clinical research result being reported. Based on the collected global clinical research result of FLASH-RT in recent years, this study systematically reviewed FLASH-RT′s safety, radiation-related side effects, treatment efficacy, opportunities, and challenges in clinical trials.

Objective:To compare the radiation chemistry effects on water molecules after ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) and conventional irradiation.Methods:Both FLASH and conventional irradiation were applied to ultrapure water, with the hydroxyl radical yield in the homogeneous phase detected using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and the hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2) yield in the diffusion phase analyzed uuxing fluorescence probe. The liposome model was then established to investigate the radiation chemistry effect of FLASH and conventional irradiation in inducing lipid peroxidation. Results:Radiation chemistry reactions were observed in water molecules after irradiation. In the homogeneous phase, the yield of free radicals using FLASH irradiation is similar to those from conventional irradiation ( P>0.05). In the diffusion phase, the amount of H 2O 2 produced by FLASH irradiation was significantly lower than those from conventional irradiation ( t=0.49-12.81, P<0.05). The liposome model confirmed that conventional irradiation could significantly induce lipid peroxidation through the radiation chemistry effect in water molecules as compared with FLASH irradiation ( t=0.31-11.73, P<0.05). Conclusions:The radiation chemistry effect in water molecules after FLASH irradiation was significantly lower than that from conventional irradiation. This could be one of the mechanisms of FLASH effect.

Objective:To conduct a comparative analysis of the radiation damage to zebrafish embryos and the associated biological mechanism after ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) and conventional dose rate irradiation.Methods:Zebrafish embryos at 4 h post-fertilization were exposed to conventional and FLASH irradiation (9 MeV electron beam). The mortality and hatchability of zebrafish after radiation exposure were recorded. Larvae at 96 h post-irradiation underwent morphological scoring, testing of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and analysis of changes in oxidative stress indicators.Results:Electron beam irradiation at doses of 2-12 Gy exerted subtle effects on the mortality and hatchability of zebrafish embryos. However, single high-dose irradiation (≥ 6 Gy) could lead to developmental malformation of larvae, with conventional irradiation showing the most significant effects ( t = 0.87-9.75, P < 0.05). In contrast, after FLASH irradiation (≥ 6 Gy), the ROS levels in zebrafish and its oxidative stress indicators including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were significantly reduced ( t = 0.42-15.19, P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in ROS levels in incubating solutions after conventional and FLASH irradiation ( P > 0.05). Conclusions:Compared to conventional irradiation, FLASH irradiation can reduce radiation damage to zebrafish embryos, and this is in a dose-dependent manner. The two irradiation modes lead to different oxidative stress levels in zebrafish, which might be a significant factor in the reduction of radiation damage with FLASH irradiation.

As a method for local treatment, radiotherapy plays a key role in the management of tumors. In the past few decades, great progress has been made in radiotherapy technology, with improvements in conformity, homogeneity, and radiotherapy efficiency, and the results are encouraging. Nevertheless, the maximum tolerated dose of normal tissue has limited the further increase in radiotherapy dose in the tumor area. If radiation-induced toxicities can be reduced, a higher radiotherapy dose can be delivered to tumor tissue, so as to achieve a better treatment response. In recent years, the unique FLASH effect of ultra-high-dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is capable of maintaining a consistent tumor response whilst reducing radiation-induced toxicities in normal tissue, and therefore, FLASH-RT has become a research hotspot in the field of radiotherapy across the world. At present, some scholars tend to explain the FLASH effect using the theory of acute oxygen depletion, but the protective effect of FLASH-RT on normal tissue remains to be clarified. In addition, preliminary clinical studies have been conducted for FLASH-RT, and the results are promising. Based on existing evidence, this article elaborates on the research advances in FLASH-RT in the treatment of malignant tumor, so as to provide a reference for the translation and application of this new technique.