1.Self-assembly of dual-functionalized gold nanoparticle probe and its specificity.
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences 2010;39(3):296-304
OBJECTIVETo investigate the specificity of the dual-functionalized nanoparticles probes (NPs) self-assembled with colloidal gold.
METHODS13-nm gold nanoparticles were prepared with citrate reduction of HAuCl(4). These gold nanoparticles were sequentially functionalized with the specific single-strand oligonucleotide of HA gene of influenza A virus (H1N1) and disulfide molecules of m/z at 693. The NPs solution showed the red formation. The magnetic microparticles (MPs) were modified with another specific single-strand oligonucleotide in HA gene of H1N1. The sandwich complexes (MP-Target-NPs) were formed by the target DNA with the MPs and the NPs. The color change in the solution was observed and the dehybridization product was detected by MALDI TOF MS. Moreover specificity of the probes was investigated with nano-water (as a blank control) and the different target DNAs including complementary DNA,non-complementary DNA and two DNAs of one base mismatch, respectively.
RESULTThe red formation and the positive signal in MS detection of reporter mass code 693 ([M+Na](+)) were observed,which indicated the formation of sandwich complexes formed only when the completely complementary target DNAs were presented in the solution. No color formation changes and no peak signal detected by MALDI TOF MS were observed,showing that none of target of interest (nano-pure water),non-complementary DNA and two DNAs of one base mismatch existed in the systems,which indicated no sandwich complexes formed between the target DNAs and the two probes.
CONCLUSIONConsidering the simple preparation procedure and high specificity,the dual-functionalized gold nanoparticle probes would be widely and increasingly used in nucleic acid analysis. In particular,it would have broad application prospects in early diagnosis of diseases,single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing and so on.
DNA Probes ; chemistry ; Gold Colloid ; chemistry ; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype ; genetics ; Metal Nanoparticles ; chemistry ; Oligonucleotides ; genetics ; Sensitivity and Specificity
2.Safety of butylphthalide and edaravone in patients with ischemic stroke: a multicenter real-world study.
Shu-Xian LYU ; Dong-Fang QIAN ; Yu-Fei FENG ; Cheng-Wu SHEN ; Lu-Bo GUO ; Jian-Tao LYU ; Peng-Fei JIN ; Ting LI ; Si-Yuan TAN ; Zi-Xuan ZHANG ; Lin HUANG ; Xue ZHONG ; Le-Qun SU ; Xin HU ; Xin HUANG ; Xue-Yan CUI
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2023;20(4):293-308
BACKGROUND:
Butylphthalide (NBP) and edaravone (EDV) injection are common acute ischemic stroke medications in China, but there is a lack of large real-world safety studies on them. This study aimed to determine the incidence of adverse events, detect relevant safety signals, and assess the risk factors associated with these medications in real-world populations.
METHODS:
In this study, data of acute ischemic stroke patients were extracted from the electronic medical record database of six tertiary hospitals between January 2019 and August 2021. Baseline confounders were eliminated using propensity score matching. The drugs' safety was estimated by comparing the results of 24 laboratory tests standards on liver function, kidney function, lipid level, and coagulation function. The drugs' relative risk was estimated by logistic regression. A third group with patients who did not receive NBP or EDV was constructed as a reference. Prescription sequence symmetry analysis was used to evaluate the associations between adverse events and NBP and EDV, respectively.
RESULTS:
81,292 patients were included in this study. After propensity score matching, the NBP, EDV, and third groups with 727 patients in each group. Among the 15 test items, the incidence of adverse events was lower in the NBP group than in the EDV group, and the differences were statistically significant. The multivariate logistic regression equation revealed that NBP injection was not a promoting factor for abnormal laboratory test results, whereas EDV had statistically significant effects on aspartate transaminase, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol. Prescription sequence symmetry analysis showed that NBP had a weak correlation with abnormal platelet count. EDV had a positive signal associated with abnormal results in gamma-glutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, prothrombin time, and platelet count.
CONCLUSIONS
In a large real-world population, NBP has a lower incidence of adverse events and a better safety profile than EDV or other usual medications.
3.A multi-center retrospective study of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer based on real-world data.
Xue Wei DING ; Zhi Chao ZHENG ; Qun ZHAO ; Gang ZHAI ; Han LIANG ; Xin WU ; Zheng Gang ZHU ; Hai Jiang WANG ; Qing Si HE ; Xian Li HE ; Yi An DU ; Lu Chuan CHEN ; Ya Wei HUA ; Chang Ming HUANG ; Ying Wei XUE ; Ye ZHOU ; Yan Bing ZHOU ; Dan WU ; Xue Dong FANG ; You Guo DAI ; Hong Wei ZHANG ; Jia Qing CAO ; Le Ping LI ; Jie CHAI ; Kai Xiong TAO ; Guo Li LI ; Zhi Gang JIE ; Jie GE ; Zhong Fa XU ; Wen Bin ZHANG ; Qi Yun LI ; Ping ZHAO ; Zhi Qiang MA ; Zhi Long YAN ; Guo Liang ZHENG ; Yang YAN ; Xiao Long TANG ; Xiang ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2021;24(5):403-412
Objective: To explore the effect of perioperative chemotherapy on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients under real-world condition. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out. Real world data of gastric cancer patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy and surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy in 33 domestic hospitals from January 1, 2014 to January 31, 2016 were collected. Inclusion criteria: (1) gastric adenocarcinoma was confirmed by histopathology, and clinical stage was cT2-4aN0-3M0 (AJCC 8th edition); (2) D2 radical gastric cancer surgery was performed; (3) at least one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was completed; (4) at least 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) [SOX (S-1+oxaliplatin) or CapeOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin)] were completed. Exclusion criteria: (1) complicated with other malignant tumors; (2) radiotherapy received; (3) patients with incomplete data. The enrolled patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the perioperative chemotherapy group, and those who received only postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy group. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to control selection bias. The primary outcome were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after PSM. OS was defined as the time from the first neoadjuvant chemotherapy (operation + adjuvant chemotherapy group: from the date of operation) to the last effective follow-up or death. PFS was defined as the time from the first neoadjuvant chemotherapy (operation + adjuvant chemotherapy group: from the date of operation) to the first imaging diagnosis of tumor progression or death. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival rate, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the independent effect of perioperative chemo therapy on OS and PFS. Results: 2 045 cases were included, including 1 293 cases in the surgery+adjuvant chemotherapy group and 752 cases in the perioperative chemotherapy group. After PSM, 492 pairs were included in the analysis. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, tumor stage before treatment, and tumor location between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy group, patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group had higher proportion of total gastrectomy (χ(2)=40.526, P<0.001), smaller maximum tumor diameter (t=3.969, P<0.001), less number of metastatic lymph nodes (t=1.343, P<0.001), lower ratio of vessel invasion (χ(2)=11.897, P=0.001) and nerve invasion (χ(2)=12.338, P<0.001). In the perioperative chemotherapy group and surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy group, 24 cases (4.9%) and 17 cases (3.4%) developed postoperative complications, respectively, and no significant difference was found between two groups (χ(2)=0.815, P=0.367). The median OS of the perioperative chemotherapy group was longer than that of the surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy group (65 months vs. 45 months, HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62-0.89, P=0.001); the median PFS of the perioperative chemotherapy group was also longer than that of the surgery+adjuvant chemotherapy group (56 months vs. 36 months, HR=0.72, 95% CI:0.61-0.85, P<0.001). The forest plot results of subgroup analysis showed that both men and women could benefit from perioperative chemotherapy (all P<0.05); patients over 45 years of age (P<0.05) and with normal body mass (P<0.01) could benefit significantly; patients with cTNM stage II and III presented a trend of benefit or could benefit significantly (P<0.05); patients with signet ring cell carcinoma benefited little (P>0.05); tumors in the gastric body and gastric antrum benefited more significantly (P<0.05). Conclusion: Perioperative chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of gastric cancer patients.
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Female
;
Gastrectomy
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Neoadjuvant Therapy
;
Neoplasm Staging
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*