Dyspnoea is the subjective experience of breathing discomfort, made up of distinct sensations varying in intensity. It is caused by multiple factors in palliative patients, such as infections, anaemia or anxiety. Tools like the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Modified Borg scale, together with Functional Assessment Scales like the Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale and Baseline Dyspnoea Index (BDI) are used to measure the severity of Dyspnoea. Oxygen therapy can provide comfort for patients and can increase survival in selected COPD patients. An N=1 trial of supplemental oxygen is encouraged for patients with dyspnoea.Other non-pharmacological interventions such as breathing training and walking aids have been proven to be effective in managing dyspnoea. Studieshave shown that oral or parenteral opioids are useful for relieving dyspnoea. They are safe to use in titrated doses. However, morphine should be used cautiously in patients with impaired renal and liver functions. Benzodiazepines are not recommended for first-line treatment, and should be administered after consult with a palliative physician. Effort should always be made to correct reversible causes.Family education is important to alleviate the stress of caring for patients with dyspnoea.

Chronic scrotal content pain remains one of the more challenging urological problems to manage. This is a frustrating disorder to diagnose and effectively treat for both the patient and clinician, as no universally accepted treatment guidelines exist. Many patients with this condition end up seeing physicians across many disciplines, further frustrating them. The pathogenesis is not clearly understood, and the treatment ultimately depends on the etiology of the problem. This article reviews the current understanding of chronic scrotal content pain, focusing on the diagnostic work-up and treatment options.
Chronic Pain ; Epididymis ; Epididymitis ; Humans ; Male ; Pelvic Pain ; Vasovasostomy

Objective: To compare the results of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) among infants and young children tested at the Ear Unit of a Tertiary General Hospital. Methods: Design: Cross-sectional Study Setting: Tertiary General Hospital Population: Within-subject comparisons of click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) thresholds and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds among 55 infants and young children, 2 months to 35 months of age referred to the Ear Unit for electrophysiologic hearing assessment. Results: Click ABR showed strong positive correlation to all frequencies and averages of ASSR. Highest correlation was noted with the average of 1-4 kHz ASSR results with Pearson r = 0.89 (Spearman r=0.80), the average of 2-4 kHz had strong positive correlation r = 0.88 (0.79). Correlation was consistently strong through all ASSR frequencies (0.5 kHz at r=0.86 (0.74), 1 kHz at r=0.88 (0.78), 2 kHz at r=0. 87 (0.79), 4 kHz at r=0.85 (0.76)). Average differences of click ABR and ASSR thresholds were 8.2±12.9dB at 0.5 kHz, 8.6±12.6dB at 1 kHz, 5.3±11.8dB at 2 kHz and 7.8±13.4dB at 4 kHz. Among patients with no demonstrable waveforms by click ABR with maximal click stimulus, a large percentage presented with ASSR thresholds. Of these, 80.5% (33 of 41) had measurable results at 0.5 kHz with an average of 107.3±11.1dB, 85.4% (35 of 41) at 1 kHz with an average of 110.5±11.8dB, 73.2% (30 of 41) at 2 kHz with an average of 111.2±11.1dB and 63.4% (26 of 41) at 4 kHz with average of 112.2±8.21dB. Auditory steady-state response results were comparable to auditory brainstem response results in normal to severe hearing loss and provided additional information necessary for complete audiologic assessment especially among patients with severe to profound hearing loss wherein click ABR showed no responses. Up to 85.4% of patients that would have been noted to have no waveforms by click ABR still demonstrated measurable thresholds by ASSR. Conclusion: Our study suggests that ASSR may be the best available tool for assessing children with severe to profound hearing loss, and is a comparably effective tool in overall hearing assessment for patients requiring electrophysiological testing. The advantages of ASSR over click ABR include: 1) detection of frequency-specific thresholds and; 2) the detection of hearing loss thresholds beyond the limits of click ABR.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Palliative Care ; Renal Replacement Therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Treatment Refusal ; psychology

Advance Care Planning ; ethics ; legislation & jurisprudence ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision Making ; ethics ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Preference ; statistics & numerical data ; Risk Assessment ; Singapore ; Terminal Care ; ethics ; methods ; Third-Party Consent ; ethics ; legislation & jurisprudence