1.Influence of alcohol consumption on blood coagulation in rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM): an in-vivo study
Hendrik EISMANN ; Lion SIEG ; Hala AHMED ; Joerg TESKE ; Patrick BEHRENDT ; Lars FRIEDRICH ; Carsten SCHUMACHER ; Kai JOHANNING
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2020;73(4):334-341
Background:
Twenty-five to 85% of trauma patients are under the influence of alcohol in addition to experiencing injury-related coagulation impairment. Viscoelastic point-of-care tests (thrombelastography [TEG], rotational thromboelastometry [ROTEM]) are popular tools for rapid hemostasis assessment and therapeutic decision-making in this and other settings. While alcohol affects these tests in-vitro, their specific effects in-vivo are unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of alcohol ingestion on ROTEM parameters.
Methods:
Twenty volunteers provided informed consent to drinking red wine, whisk(e)y, or vodka to a target blood alcohol concentration of 1 ‰ within one hour, calculated with the Widmark formula. Blood samples were collected before drinking, at a breath alcohol concentration of 0.5 ‰, and at 1.0 ‰, but no later than one hour. After each blood collection, ExTEM and FibTEM tests were performed directly "at the bedside."
Results:
All participants had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.00 ‰ at the beginning. The mean BACs at the second and third collection were 0.48 and 0.76 ‰, respectively. There were no significant differences in the ExTEM parameters. FibTEM measurements showed a significant difference at the A10 value (13.0 vs. 14.0 mm, P = 0.014) and a trend at the maximum amplitude (maximum clot firmness [MCF] 13.7 vs. 16.2 mm, P = 0.075). We saw no significant differences in fibrinolysis parameters and no hyperfibrinolysis in our ROTEM measurements.
Conclusions
Ethanol ingestion can impair early fibrin polymerization. These results might be of special relevance in trauma and support routine application of ROTEM/TEG in such cases.
2.Whither systems medicine?
Rolf APWEILER ; Tim BEISSBARTH ; Michael R BERTHOLD ; Nils BLüTHGEN ; Yvonne BURMEISTER ; Olaf DAMMANN ; Andreas DEUTSCH ; Friedrich FEUERHAKE ; Andre FRANKE ; Jan HASENAUER ; Steve HOFFMANN ; Thomas HöFER ; Peter LM JANSEN ; Lars KADERALI ; Ursula KLINGMüLLER ; Ina KOCH ; Oliver KOHLBACHER ; Lars KUEPFER ; Frank LAMMERT ; Dieter MAIER ; Nico PFEIFER ; Nicole RADDE ; Markus REHM ; Ingo ROEDER ; Julio SAEZ-RODRIGUEZ ; Ulrich SAX ; Bernd SCHMECK ; Andreas SCHUPPERT ; Bernd SEILHEIMER ; Fabian J THEIS ; Julio VERA ; Olaf WOLKENHAUER
Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2018;50(3):e453-
New technologies to generate, store and retrieve medical and research data are inducing a rapid change in clinical and translational research and health care. Systems medicine is the interdisciplinary approach wherein physicians and clinical investigators team up with experts from biology, biostatistics, informatics, mathematics and computational modeling to develop methods to use new and stored data to the benefit of the patient. We here provide a critical assessment of the opportunities and challenges arising out of systems approaches in medicine and from this provide a definition of what systems medicine entails. Based on our analysis of current developments in medicine and healthcare and associated research needs, we emphasize the role of systems medicine as a multilevel and multidisciplinary methodological framework for informed data acquisition and interdisciplinary data analysis to extract previously inaccessible knowledge for the benefit of patients.