1.Comparison of Video-Assisted Minilaparotomy, Open, and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses.
Hwang Gyun JEON ; Kyung Hwa CHOI ; Kwang Hyun KIM ; Koon Ho RHA ; Seung Choul YANG ; Woong Kyu HAN
Yonsei Medical Journal 2012;53(1):151-157
PURPOSE: Minimally invasive management of small renal tumors has become more common. We compared the results of partial nephrectomy by video-assisted minilaparotomy surgery (VAMS), open, and laparoscopic techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared clinicopathological, oncological, and functional outcomes in 271 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for renal tumors at one institution from 1993 to 2007; including 138 by VAMS, 102 by open, and 31 by laparoscopic technique. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 47.7+/-29.1 months. No statistically significant differences in the three groups were found in tumor size, tumor location, estimated blood loss, complication rate, preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and GFR at last follow-up. Ischemic time was shorter in the open (26.9 min) and VAMS (29.3 min) groups than in the laparoscopic group (31.0 min, p=0.021). Time to normal diet and hospital stay were shorter in the VAMS (1.8 days and 5.4 days) and laparoscopic (1.8 days and 4.7 days) groups than in the open group (2.4 days and 7.3 days, p=0.036 and p<0.001, respectively). Of 180 patients with cancer, positive surgical margins occurred in 2 of 82 patients (2.4%) in the VAMS group, none of 75 patients in the open group, and 3 of 23 patients (13.0%) in the laparoscopic group (p=0.084). In the VAMS, open, and laparoscopic groups, 5-year disease-free survival was 94.8%, 95.8%, and 90.3% (p=0.485), and 5-year cancer-specific survival was 96.3%, 98.6%, and 100%, respectively (p=0.452). CONCLUSION: Partial nephrectomy using VAMS technique provides surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes similar to open and laparoscopic techniques.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality/*surgery
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Kidney Neoplasms/mortality/*surgery
;
Laparoscopy/instrumentation/*methods
;
Laparotomy/instrumentation/*methods
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Nephrectomy/instrumentation/*methods
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Video-Assisted Surgery/instrumentation/*methods
2.Clinical application of vacuum pack system for temporary abdominal closure.
Jin-bo JIANG ; Yong DAI ; Min ZHU ; Nan-hai SHOU
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2006;9(1):50-52
OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical application of a new temporary abdominal wound closure,vacuum system for temporary management of the open abdomen.
METHODSVacuum pack system consisted of polyethylene sheet,surgical towel,silicone drain, adhesive plastic drape. Clinical data of the patients undergoing exploratory celiotomy were recorded,and the indications for such temporary abdominal closure and its complications were reviewed.
RESULTSThirteen trauma patients underwent such vacuum abdominal closure for 15 times, including 5 times (33.3%) for increased intra- abdominal pressure so that tension-free fascial closure was unable to achieve, 4 times (26.7%) for reexploration, 2 times (13.3%) for damage control, and 4 times (26.7%) for combined factors. Finally, seven patients (53.8%) received direct closure and 5 patients (38.5%) received skin grafting after granulation because the defect could not be closed directly. One patient (7.7%) died before abdominal closure was attempted. None of the patients developed enterocutaneous fistula and evisceration. Three patients (23.1%) developed intra-abdominal abscess.
CONCLUSIONSThe vacuum pack is a better temporary abdominal wound closure device, and primary closure can be achieved in most of the patients. The technique is simple and easily mastered with a low complication rate.
Abdominal Injuries ; surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Bandages ; Female ; Humans ; Laparotomy ; instrumentation ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Vacuum ; Young Adult
3.Role of diagnostic laparoscopy in the treatment plan of gastric cancer.
Haojie LI ; Qi ZHANG ; Ling CHEN ; Lingqiang MIN ; Xuefei WANG ; Fenglin LIU ; Yihong SUN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2017;20(2):195-199
OBJECTIVETo assess the clinical value of the diagnostic laparoscopy in choosing treatment strategies for patients with gastric cancer.
METHODSRetrospective analysis was performed on clinical and pathological data collected from 2 023 patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery in the Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from 2009 to 2014. All the patients were diagnosed as gastric cancer by endoscopic biopsy and staged by imaging examination before surgery. During the diagnostic laparoscopy procedure, a small periumbilical incision was made and a pneumoperitoneum with COunder 10-15 mmHg was established through a port. A 10 mm trocar was put in, and the camera was inserted. Two 5 mm trocars were put in two ports which located in midclavicular line two fingers under the left and right costal margin and then the instruments were inserted. A thorough inspection included ascites, the abdominal cavity, liver, diaphragm, spleen, greater omentum, colon, small intestine, mesentery, adnexa (female) and pelvic floor. If the tumor located at the posterior part of the stomach, the gastrocolic ligament was opened in order to look for carcinomatosis in the omental bursa. The accuracy rate of diagnostic laparoscopy in diagnosing adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis was calculated, and the rate of adjusting treatment plans after diagnostic laparoscopy was also calculated.
RESULTSThere were 52.7%(1 067/2 023) of patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy. The accuracy rate of diagnostic laparoscopy in evaluating adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis were 98.3%(1 049/1 067) and 98.1%(1 047/1 067) respectively. Besides, 14 patients with stage T4b and 32 with intra-abdominal metastasis, which were missed by imaging examination, were diagnosed by diagnostic laparoscopy. The treatment plans of 9.3% (99/1 067) of patients were changed after diagnostic laparoscopy, and 65 (6.1%) cases of non-therapeutic laparotomy were avoided. However, 18 cases of adjacent organ invasion and 20 cases of intra-abdominal metastasis were still missed by diagnostic laparoscopy, and 12 cases received non-therapeutic laparotomy.
CONCLUSIONDiagnostic laparoscopy has considerable value in assessing adjacent organ invasion and intra-abdominal metastasis and has great clinical significance in making precise treatment plans.
Abdominal Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; secondary ; Digestive System ; pathology ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopes ; Laparoscopy ; instrumentation ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Laparotomy ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; diagnostic imaging ; Patient Care Planning ; statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Surgical Instruments ; Unnecessary Procedures ; statistics & numerical data