Objective To discuss the influence of grading nursing care by physician-nurse cooperation decision-making on the quality of patient care and disease outcomes,and evaluate the application feasibility of nursing core system in this nursing mode.Methods 379 patients were admitted to departments of orthopedics and endocrinology from two hospital areas of our hospital from January 2011 to January 2012.Patients were divided into two groups according to nursing process.Patients who were given conventional grading nursing were set as the routine group,and patients receiving physician-nurse collaboration grading nursing were set as the collaboration group.The nursing quality and nursing efficiency,and the disease outcome of patients were compared between the two groups.Results The quality of care,the qualified rate of care plan implementation,the coverage rate of health education of patients and the patient satisfaction rate were higher in the collaboration group than those in the routine group.The performing rate of doctor's orders,the awareness rate of patient disease,the average length of hospital stay,compliance of medical orders and re-admission rate of patients with the same or a related disease within three months were significantly different between two groups.The collaboration group improved the matching degree of nursing grade with disease condition,understanding of professional knowledge,recording of nursing records,deficient nursing process,and communication ability of life knowledge,compared with those of the routine group.Conchusions Nursing grading mode by physician-nurse collaboration decision-making can obviously improve the defmition of grading nursing and the general treatment effect of patients,it significantly improved the quality of grading nursing.

Objective:To optimize the Manchester needs tool for injured children (MANTIC) scale , and evaluate its reliability and validity among injured children. Methods:The MANTIC scale was optimized through Delphi expert consultation and pre-tests. From March 2023 to June 2023 , a total of 317 injured children admitted in 7 level A tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang and Shandong provinces and their families were surveyed with general data, optimized MANTIC scale, and EuroQol 5-dimension health questionnaire for youth (EQ-5D-Y). Item analysis was conducted on the data of the 317 patients collected with optimized MANTIC scale through the test for homogeneity and value-based decision-making method and the content validity test of the scale was evaluated with item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and scale-level content validity index (S-CVI). It was evaluated with KMO test values and Bartlett′s test of sphericity to determine whether the scale was suitable for exploratory factors. The number of common factors was determined based on the K1 criterion and scree plot to further obtain the structural validity of the scale of the item load value. The correlation validity of the scale was evaluated with the correlation coefficient of the optimized MANTIC scale and EQ-5D-Y. The reliability of the scale was tested with Cronbach alpha coefficient and Guttman split-half reliability coefficient. Results:A total of 332 questionnaires were distributed, among which 317 valid ones were collected, with a response rate of 95.6%. The test of homogeneity in the item analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between each item and the total score of the scale was 0.40-0.80. The results of the value-based decision-making method showed that the critical ratio of high-and low-scored groups was 6.08-28.01. The quality of all the items met the retention requirements so that the reliability and validity tests could be continued. Validity test found that I-CVI was 0.83-1.00, consistent S-CVI was 0.83, and mean S-CVI was 0.95. In structural validity analysis, the KMO value was 0.96, and the Chi-square value of Bartlett′s test of sphericity was 10755.76 ( P<0.01). A total of 9 common factors were extracted with the K1 criterion (eigen value>1), and the scree plot indicated 9 common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 73.46%. Factor extraction and rotation showed that the load value of each item of the scale ranged from 0.589 to 0.874. The correlation coefficient of the optimized MANTIC scale and EQ-5D-Y was r= 0.55 ( P<0.01).Reliability test showed that the Cronbach alpha coefficient of the total scale and all dimensions was 0.96 and 0.77-0.98, and the Guttman split-half reliability coefficient was 0.76 and 0.73-0.98. Conclusion:The optimized MANTIC scale can attain good reliability, validity, consistency and stability, and can reflect the concept to be expressed and the content to be evaluated, indicating that it can be used to evaluate the injury rehabilitation needs of injured children and their families throughout the entire treatment process.