PURPOSE: High-functioning autism spectrum disorder (ASD) involves pragmatic impairment of language skills. Among numerous tasks for assessing pragmatic linguistic skills, idioms are important to evaluating high-functioning ASD. Nevertheless, no assessment tool has been developed with specific consideration of Korean culture. Therefore, we designed the Korean Autism Social Language Task (KASLAT) to test idiom comprehension in ASD. The aim of the current study was to introduce this novel psychological tool and evaluate idiom comprehension deficits in high-functioning ASD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The participants included 42 children, ages 6-11 years, who visited our child psychiatric clinic between April 2014 and May 2015. The ASD group comprised 16 children; the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) group consisted of 16 children. An additional 10 normal control children who had not been diagnosed with either disorder participated in this study. Idiom comprehension ability was assessed in these three groups using the KASLAT. RESULTS: Both ASD and ADHD groups had significantly lower scores on the matched and mismatched tasks, compared to the normal control children (matched tasks mean score: ASD 11.56, ADHD 11.56, normal control 14.30; mismatched tasks mean score: ASD 6.50, ADHD 4.31, normal control 11.30). However, no significant differences were found in scores of KASLAT between the ADHD and ASD groups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that children with ASD exhibit greater impairment in idiom comprehension, compared to normal control children. The KASLAT may be useful in evaluating idiom comprehension ability.
Autism Spectrum Disorder/*diagnosis/psychology ; Child ; *Comprehension ; Female ; Humans ; Language ; Language Development Disorders/*diagnosis/psychology ; Language Disorders/*psychology ; Language Tests/*standards ; Male ; Reproducibility of Results

PURPOSE: As a preliminary study on the development of a new developmental screening tool, this study examined the validity of the Korean Ages and Stages Questionnaires (K-ASQ). METHODS: The clinical sample included a total of 218 Infants and children at 30, 36, 60 months of age, who were diagnosed with developmental disorders. Age- and sex-matched normal controls were selected from a national large-scale K-ASQ database. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated in different age and diagnosis groups, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed as well. In addition, concurrent validity was analyzed for the clinical sample by comparing the K-ASQ with other reference scales. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the K-ASQ were above fair (0.82-0.96) overall, however they varied depending on age and diagnosis groups. Specifically, the sensitivity at 60 months was relatively low (0.65). Especially, the discrimination sensitivity for the language delay group was poor at 60 months (0.42). ROC analysis showed that the overall discrimination capacity was above fair in all 5 domains [area under the curve (AUC): 0.74-0.98]. However, there were some domains and age groups with relatively poor discrimination capacity. In terms of concurrent validity, the correlations between the K-ASQ domains and reference scale subscales were statistically significant overall, but weak in some domains. CONCLUSION: The overall discrimination capacity and concurrent validity of the K-ASQ were above fair, but there were some domains, age, and diagnosis groups in which the K-ASQ was not successful in identifying potentially developmentally challenged children. These findings suggested the need for the development of a new developmental screening test tool, which is suitable for Korean infants & children.
Child* ; Diagnosis ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Humans ; Infant* ; Language Development Disorders ; Mass Screening ; Surveys and Questionnaires* ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Weights and Measures