Objective: This study aimed to assess whether the conventional treatments administered in the emergency department (ED) for hypertensive urgencies (observed or peroral [PO]-controlled) in severe high blood pressure (BP) patients with epistaxis increase the incidence of epistaxis recurrence and the mortality rate as compared to immediate BP control using intravenous (IV) antihypertensive medication Methods: A retrospective study over 7 years was conducted at the ED of a tertiary university hospital. Among adult patients with spontaneous epistaxis, subjects with severe high BP (systolic BP ≥180 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥120 mmHg) were included in the study. Participants were divided into three groups determined by the methods used to control BP: non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups. The incidence of epistaxis recurrence and mortality rate within 6 months were compared. Results: Among the 380 patients enrolled, 238 were discharged from the ED without any pharmacological antihypertensive treatment (non-controlled group), 83 received PO antihypertensive medication (PO-controlled group), and 59 received IV antihypertensive medication (IV-controlled group). Of these, 29 (12.2%), nine (10.8%), and seven (11.9%) patients from the non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups, respectively, experienced epistaxis recurrence within 24 hours, which was statistically not different among the three groups (P=0.948). The 6-month mortality rates were determined to be 0.8%, 2.4%, and 3.4% in the non-controlled, PO-controlled, and IV-controlled groups, respectively. The difference was also not significant among the groups (P=0.294). Conclusion The conventional treatments of hypertensive urgencies (observed or PO-controlled) in patients with severe high BP with epistaxis in the ED did not increase the incidence of epistaxis recurrence and short-term mortality rate when compared to immediate BP control using IV antihypertensive medication.

This case report details a 23-year-old female with Down syndrome who suffered from acute respiratory failure due to severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and accompanying pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The patient presented with obesity, adenotonsillar hypertrophy, and craniofacial anomalies commonly seen in Down syndrome, predisposing her to sleep-disordered breathing. Upon intensive care unit admission, she exhibited cardiomegaly, bilateral pulmonary edema, and right ventricular dysfunction. Polysomnography revealed severe sleep apnea with an apnea-hypopnea index of 108.7/hr. Treatment modalities included noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, diuretics, antibiotics, and positive airway pressure (PAP) devices to manage hypercapnia, pulmonary edema, and sleep apnea. PAH, a recognized complication of untreated sleep apnea, contributed to right ventricular dysfunction. A multidisciplinary approach was vital, with long-term management centered on continuous PAP therapy and comprehensive obesity management. This case underscores the intricate interplay between Down syndrome, sleep apnea, and PAH, highlighting the significance of early recognition and coordinated intervention in individuals with Down syndrome to enhance overall outcomes and quality of life.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is a type of human coronavirus that causes severe pneumonia, similar to SARS-CoV-1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. In Korea, the SARS-CoV-2 testing has started quickly from February 2020 to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, I would like to introduce the characteristics of coronavirus and PCR test methods that play a large role in COVID-19 quarantine measures. Real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR is one of the molecular diagnostic method, and it detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA by amplifying SARS-CoV-2 specific RdRp(RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) gene and E (envelope) gene at the same time. Real-time RT-PCR is currently the most reliable test that confirming COVID-19 and is in use worldwide. Real-time RT-PCR test is recommended for COVID-19 confirmatory diagnosis in Korea, but this test requires dedicated equipment, reagents, experienced technicians and laboratory medicine specialists, and it takes about a few hours to a day to report. Rapid molecular testing results in one to two hours with a simple procedure. Antigen test is less sensitive than real-time RT-PCR and can only be used as a secondary role of diagnosis. As the global COVID-19 pandemic progresses, diagnostic testing guidelines and recommendations may vary and will be updated as scientific evidence and experience of the COVID-19 accumulates.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is a type of human coronavirus that causes severe pneumonia, similar to SARS-CoV-1 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. In Korea, the SARS-CoV-2 testing has started quickly from February 2020 to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this article, I would like to introduce the characteristics of coronavirus and PCR test methods that play a large role in COVID-19 quarantine measures. Real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR is one of the molecular diagnostic method, and it detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA by amplifying SARS-CoV-2 specific RdRp(RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) gene and E (envelope) gene at the same time. Real-time RT-PCR is currently the most reliable test that confirming COVID-19 and is in use worldwide. Real-time RT-PCR test is recommended for COVID-19 confirmatory diagnosis in Korea, but this test requires dedicated equipment, reagents, experienced technicians and laboratory medicine specialists, and it takes about a few hours to a day to report. Rapid molecular testing results in one to two hours with a simple procedure. Antigen test is less sensitive than real-time RT-PCR and can only be used as a secondary role of diagnosis. As the global COVID-19 pandemic progresses, diagnostic testing guidelines and recommendations may vary and will be updated as scientific evidence and experience of the COVID-19 accumulates.

Objective: The shortage of clinical data regarding adult patients with often results in adults with ADHD being stigmatized and being inadequately treated. In this paper, famous people who potentially have ADHD were analyzed to understand better, the life-long progression of ADHD. Methods: 131 people were analyzed as potential candidates for ADHD. A grading system for the candidates was developed: class 1, compatible with ADHD; class 2, likely; class 3, less likely; class 4, uncertain with a shortage of data; and class 5, not compatible. Initially, 39 subjects in class 4 and 12 in class 5 were excluded from the analysis. Finally, 80 subjects (30 in class 1, 33 in class 2, and 17 in class 3) were analyzed for sociodemographic data and psychiatric comorbidities. Results: 88.8% were men and 47.5% of the subjects were married once. In terms of occupation, 45.0% of the subjects were cultural professionals and 25.0% were chief executives. Narcissistic personality disorder was the most frequently noted comorbidity, followed by substance-related and addictive disorder. Conclusion Famous people with ADHD in this study revealed high skill levels in occupation, offering positive aspects of ADHD in adults.

Purpose: We investigated the effects of cold water immersion (CWI) treatment during half-time break on performance related physiological indices during second half soccer match. Methods: Twenty-two collegiate soccer players participated in the study. Subjects undertook 3 minutes head out seated with whole body immersion at 19 o C to 21 o C. Total four venous blood samples were collected and analyzed for markers of ionic regulations and inflammatory (interleukin [IL]-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α , and vascular endothelial growth factor) and immune functions (immunoglobulin [Ig] G, IgG2, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA, and IgM). Results: Partial oxygen concentration and %SO 2 level was lowered in CWI. Hemoglobin and hematocrit values were not significantly different between experimental groups. While there was no notable effect was shown in Na ＋ and Ca 2＋ , K ＋ concentration was higher in CWI during second half match. There were no effects in any of inflammatory and/or anti-inflammatory cytokines and Ig. Conclusion These results suggest that CWI during half time break exert positively affects in buffering capacity and promote oxygen delivery to the actively recruited skeletal muscle, possibly results in improve soccer performance during second half match.

External quality assessment (EQA) is important for evaluating clinical laboratories and enhancing their testing quality. EQA schemes are variable; thus, it is crucial that the EQA organizers share their experiences to continuously improve the EQA scheme. The Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service (KEQAS) has been the leading, authorized EQA institute for the standardization and quality management of laboratory testing in Korean medical institutions since 1976. The EQA scheme underwent a major change in 2016, and the number of EQA programs increased significantly since then. The key changes implemented in EQA scheme include a fully computerized assessment to accelerate feedback and unification of the testing and reporting methods. We provide an overview of the EQA schemes and performance evaluation criteria of the KEQAS and suggest directions for achieving the global harmonization of EQA.

BACKGROUND: Standardization of creatinine assay is consistently performed and much effort has been put into improving the accuracy of the results. We aimed to analyze the results of accuracy-based proficiency testing of creatinine assays performed by the Korea Association of External Quality Assessment Service from 2011 to 2017 to assess the current state of creatinine assays in Korea. METHODS: From 2011 to 2017, the accuracy-based proficiency testing of creatinine was performed twice a year. We analyzed the results obtained from the participating laboratories and calculated the year-wise bias. The acceptable limit of bias was as follows: ±11.4% for creatinine concentration >1.0 mg/dL, and 0.114 mg/dL for creatinine concentration ≤1.0 mg/dL. The trend of bias with the major instruments and reagent manufacturers were analyzed. RESULTS: The number of participating laboratories was 54 in 2011, which gradually increased to 146–178 after 2015. For each of the three samples used in the survey, the percentage of laboratories whose biases in the results were within the acceptable limits was 33.3% for the first time in 2011, which gradually increased to 74.7%–85.0% after 2014. The mean biases in all the results of the participating laboratories were 11.1% in 2011 (1st trial) and 2.4% in 2017 (2nd trial). The biases in the results with the major instruments and reagents differed according to the manufacturers. CONCLUSIONS: The mean bias in the results obtained from the participating laboratories in the accuracy-based proficiency testing of creatinine surveys showed a decreasing trend.
Bias (Epidemiology) ; Creatinine ; Indicators and Reagents ; Korea

No abstract available.
Diagnosis ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry