The right hand of a 58-year-old female was compressed by a compression machine and subsequently began to show pain. She was diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type 2 according to the Budapest criteria. Conventional therapy was ineffective for her allodynia. After subcutaneous injection of botulinum toxin, the subject’s allodynia substantially improved. Subcutaneous injection of botulinum toxin could effectively treat patients with complex regional pain syndrome and intractable allodynia. Clinical studies with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the efficacy of and selection of patients for botulinum toxin treatment of complex regional pain syndrome.

Objective: Recent studies have shown that repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) reduces pain in various conditions. This pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of rPMS depending on the pain characteristics. Method: Adult patients aged 19∼85 years evaluated at our institution between September 1, 2017 and February 28, 2018 for subacute to chronic musculoskeletal pain equivalent to a numeric rating scale of 3 or higher for at least one month were enrolled. Pain scores as determined using a numeric rating scale at baseline and at the end of treatment were set as the primary outcome. Additionally, we classified the pain into nociceptive, intermediate, or neuropathic pain using the PainDETECT questionnaire and compared the responsiveness to rPMS according to the type of pain. Results: The average pain scores significantly decreased after the 2-week rPMS treatment in all enrolled subjects (p＜0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in pain reduction between groups divided by PainDETECT questionnaire. Conclusion This study suggests that rPMS could safely relieve various types of pain.

Objective: Recent studies have shown that repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) reduces pain in various conditions. This pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of rPMS depending on the pain characteristics. Method: Adult patients aged 19∼85 years evaluated at our institution between September 1, 2017 and February 28, 2018 for subacute to chronic musculoskeletal pain equivalent to a numeric rating scale of 3 or higher for at least one month were enrolled. Pain scores as determined using a numeric rating scale at baseline and at the end of treatment were set as the primary outcome. Additionally, we classified the pain into nociceptive, intermediate, or neuropathic pain using the PainDETECT questionnaire and compared the responsiveness to rPMS according to the type of pain. Results: The average pain scores significantly decreased after the 2-week rPMS treatment in all enrolled subjects (p＜0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in pain reduction between groups divided by PainDETECT questionnaire. Conclusion This study suggests that rPMS could safely relieve various types of pain.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a machine learning-based model (eXtreme Gradient boost [XGBoost]) that can accurately predict the severity of acute cholangitis in patients. The model was designed to simplify the classification process compared to conventional methods. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients with cholangitis who visited the emergency department of a secondary medical institution in Seongnam, Korea from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. The patients were divided into three groups (Grade I, II, III) based on severity according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018/2013 (TG18/13) severity assessment criteria for cholangitis. We used algorithms to select variables of high relevance associated with the grade of severity. For the XGBoost models, data were divided into a train set and a validation set by the random split method. The train set was trained in XGBoost models using only the top seven variables. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) were obtained from the validation set. Results: 796 patients were enrolled. The top 7 variables associated with the grade of severity were albumin, white blood cells, blood urea nitrogen, troponin T, platelets, creatinine, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio. The AUROC values were 0.881 (Grade I), 0.836 (Grade II), and 0.932 (Grade III). The AUPRC values were 0.457 (Grade I), 0.820 (Grade II), and 0.880 (Grade III). Conclusion We believe that the developed XGBoost model is a useful tool for predicting the severity of acute cholangitis with high accuracy and fewer variables than the conventional severity classification method.

Objective: Patients presenting with fingertip skin defect injuries without exposed bone can avail of two treatment options at the emergency department (ED). This study compared outcomes between dressing and composite graft (CG) using skin stump for patients visiting the ED with fingertip skin defect injuries without exposed bone. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. We reviewed 244 patients with fingertip skin defect injuries without exposed bone who visited the ED from September 2018 to February 2021. We compared the outcomes of the patients who were treated by CG using skin stump and those who received a dressing in the ED. Results: In all, 142 patients were treated by CG using skin stump, and 102 patients were given a dressing only. In the CG group, good outcomes were obtained in 140 patients, whereas additional skin graft treatment was required for two patients with bad outcomes. In the dressing group, 81 patients had good outcomes and 21 patients had bad outcomes which required additional skin graft treatment. Conclusion Results of our study revealed that compared to traditional dressing, ED treatment for fingertip skin defects without exposed bone showed good outcomes when administered CG using skin stump. Hence, we recommend that instead of simple dressing, CG using skin stump is the preferred mode of treatment for patients presenting in the ED with fingertip skin defect injuries without exposed bone.

Objective: This study examined the predictive factors to decide the surgical treatment for clinically suspected pediatric acute appendicitis with equivocal imaging findings. Methods: This study was conducted retrospectively on children who visited local emergency medical centers and outpatients from January 2018 to February 2021. The electronic medical records were reviewed from 811 pediatric patients younger than 16 years of age with the chief complaint of abdominal pain and who underwent an imaging test for the clinical suspicion of appendicitis. Ninety-two patients who showed ambiguous findings on imaging tests but were still suspected of having appendicitis were analyzed. Recursive partitioning analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify the variables associated with appendicitis. Results: Of the 92 enrolled patients, 23 patients were confirmed to have appendicitis, and 69 did not. Patients with the clinical suspicion who had an elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, polymorphonuclear leukocyte differential count (PMN), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and leukocytosis were more likely to have appendicitis. The PMN (odds ratio=1.175; 95% confidence interval, 1.092-1.265) and ANC (odds ratio=1.00050; 95% confidence interval, 1.00025-1.00075) remained significant after multivariable logistic analysis. Conclusion Elevated PMN and ANC are clinical predictors of pediatric appendicitis when the imaging findings are nondiagnostic, and the clinical suspicion is continuous.

Background: A nationwide Rehabilitation at Home Care Pilot Program for patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgeries has been ongoing since 2020. The program was designed to improve clinical outcomes through early mobilization and rehabilitation after discharge. This study aimed to analyze the interim data to assess its effectiveness and suggest improvements, particularly for older patients who are more vulnerable compared to younger patients. Methods: We analyzed the data of 872 patients from seven hospitals. Patients were divided into an older-age group (OG; ≥60 years) and younger-age group (YG; <60 years). The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain were the main outcomes. Results: Participants were categorized into OG (n=801) and YG (n=71). The most common surgeries were knee joint replacement (63.7%) in OG and hip joint replacement in YG (77.5%). It took more days to enroll in the pilot program in OG (4.4 days) than YG (3.2 days). OG showed less improvement in BBS than YG for all surgeries (23.3 vs. 31.9) and hip joint surgery (19.8 vs. 33.5). In patients with hip joint replacement in OG, those with a higher number of comorbidities (≥3) showed less BBS improvement than those with fewer comorbidities (<3). In the pain domain, NRS scores decreased in both groups. Conclusion The postoperative rehabilitation education program appeared to be effective in improving physical function and reducing pain severity, though the improvement was less obvious in older patients who may require a more comprehensive approach compared to younger patients.

Background: A nationwide Rehabilitation at Home Care Pilot Program for patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgeries has been ongoing since 2020. The program was designed to improve clinical outcomes through early mobilization and rehabilitation after discharge. This study aimed to analyze the interim data to assess its effectiveness and suggest improvements, particularly for older patients who are more vulnerable compared to younger patients. Methods: We analyzed the data of 872 patients from seven hospitals. Patients were divided into an older-age group (OG; ≥60 years) and younger-age group (YG; <60 years). The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain were the main outcomes. Results: Participants were categorized into OG (n=801) and YG (n=71). The most common surgeries were knee joint replacement (63.7%) in OG and hip joint replacement in YG (77.5%). It took more days to enroll in the pilot program in OG (4.4 days) than YG (3.2 days). OG showed less improvement in BBS than YG for all surgeries (23.3 vs. 31.9) and hip joint surgery (19.8 vs. 33.5). In patients with hip joint replacement in OG, those with a higher number of comorbidities (≥3) showed less BBS improvement than those with fewer comorbidities (<3). In the pain domain, NRS scores decreased in both groups. Conclusion The postoperative rehabilitation education program appeared to be effective in improving physical function and reducing pain severity, though the improvement was less obvious in older patients who may require a more comprehensive approach compared to younger patients.

Background: A nationwide Rehabilitation at Home Care Pilot Program for patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgeries has been ongoing since 2020. The program was designed to improve clinical outcomes through early mobilization and rehabilitation after discharge. This study aimed to analyze the interim data to assess its effectiveness and suggest improvements, particularly for older patients who are more vulnerable compared to younger patients. Methods: We analyzed the data of 872 patients from seven hospitals. Patients were divided into an older-age group (OG; ≥60 years) and younger-age group (YG; <60 years). The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain were the main outcomes. Results: Participants were categorized into OG (n=801) and YG (n=71). The most common surgeries were knee joint replacement (63.7%) in OG and hip joint replacement in YG (77.5%). It took more days to enroll in the pilot program in OG (4.4 days) than YG (3.2 days). OG showed less improvement in BBS than YG for all surgeries (23.3 vs. 31.9) and hip joint surgery (19.8 vs. 33.5). In patients with hip joint replacement in OG, those with a higher number of comorbidities (≥3) showed less BBS improvement than those with fewer comorbidities (<3). In the pain domain, NRS scores decreased in both groups. Conclusion The postoperative rehabilitation education program appeared to be effective in improving physical function and reducing pain severity, though the improvement was less obvious in older patients who may require a more comprehensive approach compared to younger patients.