Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps (GBPs) and gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, characterizing GBPs and GBWT in asymptomatic patients can be challenging and may result in overtreatment, including unnecessary follow-ups or surgeries. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) Clinical Practice Guideline Committee has developed expert recommendations that focus on standardized imaging interpretation and follow-up strategies for both GBPs and GBWT, with support from the Korean Society of Radiology and KSAR. These guidelines, which address 24 key questions, aim to standardize the approach for the interpretation of imaging findings, reporting, imaging-based workups, and surveillance of incidentally detected GBPs and GBWT. This recommendation promotes evidence-based practice, facilitates communication between radiologists and referring physicians, and reduces unnecessary interventions.

The anticancer drugs have evolved significantly, spanning molecular targeted therapeutics (MTTs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Complications associated with these drugs vary widely based on their mechanisms of action. MTTs that target angiogenesis can often lead to complications related to ischemia or endothelial damage across various organs, whereas non-anti-angiogenic MTTs present unique complications derived from their specific pharmacological actions. ICIs are predominantly associated with immunerelated adverse events, such as pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, thyroid disorders, hypophysitis, and sarcoid-like reactions. CAR-T therapy causes unique and severe complications including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. ADCs tend to cause complications associated with cytotoxic payloads. A comprehensive understanding of these drug-specific toxicities, particularly using medical imaging, is essential for providing optimal patient care. Based on this knowledge, radiologists can play a pivotal role in multidisciplinary teams. Therefore, radiologists must stay up-to-date on the imaging characteristics of these complications and the mechanisms underlying novel anticancer drugs.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality used as an alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules, recurrent thyroid cancers (RTCs), and primary thyroid microcarcinomas. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) initially developed recommendations for the optimal use of RFA for thyroid tumors in 2009 and revised them in 2012 and 2017. As new meaningful evidence has accumulated since 2017 and in response to a growing global interest in the use of RFA for treating malignant thyroid lesions, the task force committee members of the KSThR decided to update the guidelines on the use of RFA for the management of RTCs based on a comprehensive analysis of current literature and expert consensus.

Objective: To test the performance of an artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) designed for fullfield digital mammography (FFDM) when applied to synthetic mammography (SM). Materials and Methods: We analyzed 501 women (mean age, 57 ± 11 years) who underwent preoperative mammography and breast cancer surgery. This cohort consisted of 1002 breasts, comprising 517 with cancer and 485 without. All patients underwent digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and FFDM during the preoperative workup. The SM is routinely reconstructed using DBT. Commercial AI-CAD (Lunit Insight MMG, version 1.1.7.2) was retrospectively applied to SM and FFDM to calculate the abnormality scores for each breast. The median abnormality scores were compared for the 517 breasts with cancer using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Calibration curves of abnormality scores were evaluated. The discrimination performance was analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity using a 10% preset threshold. Sensitivity and specificity were further analyzed according to the mammographic and pathological characteristics.The results of SM and FFDM were compared. Results: AI-CAD demonstrated a significantly lower median abnormality score (71% vs. 96%, P < 0.001) and poorer calibration performance for SM than for FFDM. SM exhibited lower sensitivity (76.2% vs. 82.8%, P < 0.001), higher specificity (95.5% vs.91.8%, P < 0.001), and comparable AUC (0.86 vs. 0.87, P = 0.127) than FFDM. SM showed lower sensitivity than FFDM in asymptomatic breasts, dense breasts, ductal carcinoma in situ, T1, N0, and hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative cancers but showed higher specificity in non-cancerous dense breasts. Conclusion AI-CAD showed lower abnormality scores and reduced calibration performance for SM than for FFDM.Furthermore, the 10% preset threshold resulted in different discrimination performances for the SM. Given these limitations, off-label application of the current AI-CAD to SM should be avoided.

Clinical trials for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are in the early stages but are expected to progress alongside new treatment approaches. This suggests that imaging will play an important role in monitoring disease progression, treatment response, and treatment-related side effects. There are, however, challenges that remain unresolved, regarding imaging in CAR T-cell therapy. We herein discuss the role of imaging, focusing on how tumor response evaluation varies according to cancer type and target antigens in CAR T-cell therapy. CAR T-cell therapy often produces rapid and significant responses, and imaging is vital for identifying side effects such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Radiologists should be aware of drug mechanisms, response assessments, and associated toxicities to effectively support these therapies. Additionally, this article highlights the importance of the Lugano criteria, which is essential for standardized assessment of treatment response, particularly in lymphoma therapies, and also explores other factors influencing imaging-based evaluation, including emerging methodologies and their potential to improve the accuracy and consistency of response assessments.

Objective: This study aimed to quantitatively assess abnormalities in the talar dome cartilage using MRI T2 mapping, with additional analyses based on the Lauge-Hansen (LH) classification and anatomical locations. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 78 patients who underwent ankle MRI with T2 mapping for acute ankle trauma between January 2021 and October 2022. Patients were classified into the supination (S) and pronation (P) groups based on the LH classification, and then divided into subgroups based on posterior malleolus (PM) involvement. The T2 values for the talar cartilage were quantitatively measured in six anatomical regions defined by the combination of medial vs.lateral and anterior vs. central vs. posterior. The T2 mapping values in each region of the talus were compared between the S and P groups and between the PM and non-PM injury groups using t-tests. The T2 values were also compared between the medial and lateral sides within each group. Results: Among the 78 patients (mean age, 38.62 ± 14.82 years; 47 male), 53 and 25 were in the S and P groups, respectively, and 53 patients showed PM involvement. In comparison with the P group, the S group exhibited higher T2 values in the medial portion (61.27 ± 8.30 vs. 54.03 ± 6.96; P < 0.001) and lower T2 values in the lateral talus (54.95 ± 8.47 vs. 64.15 ± 7.31; P < 0.001). The PM injury group showed higher T2 values in the posterior region than the non-PM injury group (P ≤ 0.011). Within the PM injury group, T2 values were higher in the anteromedial and posterolateral regions than on the opposite sides (P= 0.037 and 0.011, respectively). Conclusion MRI T2 values demonstrated significant regional variations in the talar dome cartilage in acute ankle trauma, and the T2 values may reflect different ankle trauma mechanisms and PM involvement. Thus, T2 mapping can facilitate evaluation of talar cartilage alterations.

Mammography is the standard screening method for breast cancer, proven to reduce mortality. However, its diagnostic performance varies depending on patient characteristics and radiologist expertise. Dense breast tissue, present in approximately 70% of Korean women aged 40 to 59, limits detection by obscuring malignancies. Additionally, optimal interpretation requires extensive training, which is not always achievable. Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD) has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing mammographic accuracy and efficiency.Current Concepts: AI-CAD has shown diagnostic performance comparable to that of experienced radiologists while addressing the limitations of traditional CAD systems, particularly excessive false positives. Studies suggest AI-CAD improves radiologists' accuracy, particularly among those with limited breast imaging experience. In Europe, AI-assisted reading is increasingly recognized as a viable alternative to traditional double reading. In Korea, adoption of AI-CAD is expanding, with systems approved by the Korean Food and Drug Administration currently in clinical use. Recently, one AI-CAD system received conditional non-reimbursement designation, allowing hospitals to use it for up to 5 years while collecting clinical evidence to support future insurance coverage decisions.Discussion and Conclusion: AI-CAD has significant potential to enhance early breast cancer detection while maintaining acceptable false-positive rates, making it a valuable adjunct in screening programs. Beyond improved detection, AI-CAD may optimize workflow efficiency by triaging cases and prioritizing high-risk examinations. However, its integration into clinical practice necessitates standardized guidelines, regulatory oversight, and further validation through large-scale prospective studies. As AI technology continues to advance, ongoing investigation into its role in personalized breast cancer screening is essential.

Purpose: To evaluate the compatibility and usability of test results obtained from the IDRA and Keratograph 5M in clinical settings by comparing their performance in patients with dry eye disease. Methods: From December 27 to 30, 2022, a study was conducted on 30 patients diagnosed with dry eye utilizing both the Keratograph 5M and IDRA devices. The parameters compared and analyzed included lipid layer thickness, tear meniscus height, tear film break-up time, and meibography. A paired t-test was used for statistical comparison. The lipid layer thickness in the Keratograph 5M was graded on a scale from 0 to 4 based on thickness. Results: No significant differences were found between the two devices in tear film break-up time, tear meniscus height, and meibography (p = 0.148, 0.072, 0.124, respectively). However, the tear lipid layer thickness measured by IDRA showed a proportional relationship with the grade assigned by the Keratograph 5M (Kendall R = 0.217, p = 0.037; Spearman R = 0.260, p = 0.045). Conclusions The IDRA device offers the advantage of performing multiple dry eye tests; simultaneously, thereby saving time compared to the Keratograph 5M. Both devices can be used compatibly with IDRA particularly advantageous for providing a numerical value for tear lipid layer thickness which enhances the convenience of dry eye diagnosis and treatment.