1.A Case of Losteriosis on Third trimester with Fetal distress.
Shin Cheol KIM ; Jun Taek LEE ; Who Kon JUNG ; Byung Do PARK ; Kyung Ran ZOO ; Joo Wook KIM
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1999;42(1):194-197
Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive rod which can be isolated from soil, vegetation, and many animal reservoirs. Human disease due to Listeria monocytogenes is uncommon but occurs most frequently in the neonatal period, during pregnancy and in elderly or immuno-suppressed patients. Listeriosis in pregnant women may cause spontaneous abortion, fetal distress, preterm labor, fetal death, or neonatal septicemia/meningitis. Maternal infection alone may occur without infection of the infant, especially at the end of pregnancy. One case of septicemia with Listeria monocytogenes in pregnant women at the 35th weeks of pregnancy with fetal distress is presented.
Abortion, Spontaneous
;
Aged
;
Animals
;
Female
;
Fetal Death
;
Fetal Distress*
;
Humans
;
Infant
;
Listeria monocytogenes
;
Listeriosis
;
Obstetric Labor, Premature
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Trimester, Third*
;
Pregnant Women
;
Sepsis
;
Soil
2.A Case of Meconium Peritonitis Diagnosed by Prenatal Ultrasonography.
Tae Sung HA ; Ki Hwan KIM ; Jae Seong SEO ; Myung Sup JO ; Ok GO ; Kyung Ran ZOO ; Joo Wook KIM
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;40(7):1502-1506
Meconium peritonitis is a non-bacterial foreign body and chemical peritonitis caused by meconium contamination resulting from bowel perforation during late intrauterine or early neonatal periods. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of the meconium peritonitis provides the preparation for proper management and decreasing motality and morbidity of the neonate. We have experienced a case of meconium peritonitis diagnosed by ultrasonography at 34+4 gestational weeks and presented this case with a brief review of the literatures.
Diagnosis
;
Foreign Bodies
;
Humans
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Meconium*
;
Peritonitis*
;
Ultrasonography
;
Ultrasonography, Prenatal*
3.Comparison of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Sevoflurane-Alfentanil Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Eun Hye KOO ; Hyun Jung KIM ; Hee Zoo KIM ; Hye Ran OH ; Il Ok LEE ; Nan Sook KIM ; Mi Kyung LEE
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2006;51(1):24-28
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, double-blind randomized study was to compare the clinical properties of sevoflurane-alfentanil with propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Forty patients (ASA physical status 1, 2) scheduled for elective surgery received total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA group) with remifentanil and propofol or sevoflurane-alfentanil. The TIVA group was induced with propofol 5 microgram/ml and remifentanil 4.5 ng/ml. The anesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusions of propofol 2.5 microgram/ml and remifentanil 3 ng/ml. The sevoflurane-alfentanil group was induced with alfentanil 15 microgram/kg and propofol 1.5 mg/kg IV. Maintenance was obtained with 2.0 vol% sevoflurane and a bolus of alfentanil 10microgram/kg IV where needed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the time to eye opening, the time to extubation, post-anesthetic recovery room stay time and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol-remifentanil (TIVA) and sevoflurane-alfentanil both provided satisfactory anesthesia for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Alfentanil
;
Anesthesia*
;
Anesthesia, Intravenous*
;
Blood Pressure
;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
;
Heart Rate
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
;
Propofol
;
Prospective Studies
;
Recovery Room