1.Early Administration of Nelonemdaz May Improve the Stroke Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke
Jin Soo LEE ; Ji Sung LEE ; Seong Hwan AHN ; Hyun Goo KANG ; Tae-Jin SONG ; Dong-Ick SHIN ; Hee-Joon BAE ; Chang Hun KIM ; Sung Hyuk HEO ; Jae-Kwan CHA ; Yeong Bae LEE ; Eung Gyu KIM ; Man Seok PARK ; Hee-Kwon PARK ; Jinkwon KIM ; Sungwook YU ; Heejung MO ; Sung Il SOHN ; Jee Hyun KWON ; Jae Guk KIM ; Young Seo KIM ; Jay Chol CHOI ; Yang-Ha HWANG ; Keun Hwa JUNG ; Soo-Kyoung KIM ; Woo Keun SEO ; Jung Hwa SEO ; Joonsang YOO ; Jun Young CHANG ; Mooseok PARK ; Kyu Sun YUM ; Chun San AN ; Byoung Joo GWAG ; Dennis W. CHOI ; Ji Man HONG ; Sun U. KWON ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):279-283
2.Early Administration of Nelonemdaz May Improve the Stroke Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke
Jin Soo LEE ; Ji Sung LEE ; Seong Hwan AHN ; Hyun Goo KANG ; Tae-Jin SONG ; Dong-Ick SHIN ; Hee-Joon BAE ; Chang Hun KIM ; Sung Hyuk HEO ; Jae-Kwan CHA ; Yeong Bae LEE ; Eung Gyu KIM ; Man Seok PARK ; Hee-Kwon PARK ; Jinkwon KIM ; Sungwook YU ; Heejung MO ; Sung Il SOHN ; Jee Hyun KWON ; Jae Guk KIM ; Young Seo KIM ; Jay Chol CHOI ; Yang-Ha HWANG ; Keun Hwa JUNG ; Soo-Kyoung KIM ; Woo Keun SEO ; Jung Hwa SEO ; Joonsang YOO ; Jun Young CHANG ; Mooseok PARK ; Kyu Sun YUM ; Chun San AN ; Byoung Joo GWAG ; Dennis W. CHOI ; Ji Man HONG ; Sun U. KWON ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):279-283
3.Early Administration of Nelonemdaz May Improve the Stroke Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke
Jin Soo LEE ; Ji Sung LEE ; Seong Hwan AHN ; Hyun Goo KANG ; Tae-Jin SONG ; Dong-Ick SHIN ; Hee-Joon BAE ; Chang Hun KIM ; Sung Hyuk HEO ; Jae-Kwan CHA ; Yeong Bae LEE ; Eung Gyu KIM ; Man Seok PARK ; Hee-Kwon PARK ; Jinkwon KIM ; Sungwook YU ; Heejung MO ; Sung Il SOHN ; Jee Hyun KWON ; Jae Guk KIM ; Young Seo KIM ; Jay Chol CHOI ; Yang-Ha HWANG ; Keun Hwa JUNG ; Soo-Kyoung KIM ; Woo Keun SEO ; Jung Hwa SEO ; Joonsang YOO ; Jun Young CHANG ; Mooseok PARK ; Kyu Sun YUM ; Chun San AN ; Byoung Joo GWAG ; Dennis W. CHOI ; Ji Man HONG ; Sun U. KWON ;
Journal of Stroke 2025;27(2):279-283
4.Laboratory information management system for COVID-19 non-clinical efficacy trial data
Suhyeon YOON ; Hyuna NOH ; Heejin JIN ; Sungyoung LEE ; Soyul HAN ; Sung-Hee KIM ; Jiseon KIM ; Jung Seon SEO ; Jeong Jin KIM ; In Ho PARK ; Jooyeon OH ; Joon-Yong BAE ; Gee Eun LEE ; Sun-Je WOO ; Sun-Min SEO ; Na-Won KIM ; Youn Woo LEE ; Hui Jeong JANG ; Seung-Min HONG ; Se-Hee AN ; Kwang-Soo LYOO ; Minjoo YEOM ; Hanbyeul LEE ; Bud JUNG ; Sun-Woo YOON ; Jung-Ah KANG ; Sang-Hyuk SEOK ; Yu Jin LEE ; Seo Yeon KIM ; Young Been KIM ; Ji-Yeon HWANG ; Dain ON ; Soo-Yeon LIM ; Sol Pin KIM ; Ji Yun JANG ; Ho LEE ; Kyoungmi KIM ; Hyo-Jung LEE ; Hong Bin KIM ; Jun Won PARK ; Dae Gwin JEONG ; Daesub SONG ; Kang-Seuk CHOI ; Ho-Young LEE ; Yang-Kyu CHOI ; Jung-ah CHOI ; Manki SONG ; Man-Seong PARK ; Jun-Young SEO ; Ki Taek NAM ; Jeon-Soo SHIN ; Sungho WON ; Jun-Won YUN ; Je Kyung SEONG
Laboratory Animal Research 2022;38(2):119-127
Background:
As the number of large-scale studies involving multiple organizations producing data has steadily increased, an integrated system for a common interoperable format is needed. In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a number of global efforts are underway to develop vaccines and therapeutics. We are therefore observing an explosion in the proliferation of COVID-19 data, and interoperability is highly requested in multiple institutions participating simultaneously in COVID-19 pandemic research.
Results:
In this study, a laboratory information management system (LIMS) approach has been adopted to systemically manage various COVID-19 non-clinical trial data, including mortality, clinical signs, body weight, body temperature, organ weights, viral titer (viral replication and viral RNA), and multiorgan histopathology, from multiple institutions based on a web interface. The main aim of the implemented system is to integrate, standardize, and organize data collected from laboratories in multiple institutes for COVID-19 non-clinical efficacy testings. Six animal biosafety level 3 institutions proved the feasibility of our system. Substantial benefits were shown by maximizing collaborative high-quality non-clinical research.
Conclusions
This LIMS platform can be used for future outbreaks, leading to accelerated medical product development through the systematic management of extensive data from non-clinical animal studies.
5.Hepatitis B Prophylaxis after Liver Transplantation in Korea: Analysis of the KOTRY Database
Gil Chun PARK ; Shin HWANG ; Myoung Soo KIM ; Dong Hwan JUNG ; Gi Won SONG ; Kwang Woong LEE ; Jong Man KIM ; Jae Geun LEE ; Je Ho RYU ; Dong Lak CHOI ; Hee Jung WANG ; Bong Wan KIM ; Dong Sik KIM ; Yang Won NAH ; Young Kyoung YOU ; Koo Jeong KANG ; Hee Chul YU ; Yo Han PARK ; Kyung Jin LEE ; Yun Kyu KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(6):36-
BACKGROUND: Prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence is essential after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-associated recipients. We conducted real-world analysis of HBV prophylaxis after LT in the Korean population.METHODS: Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database and additionally collected data (n = 326) were analyzed with special reference to types of HBV prophylaxis.RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 267 cases of living-donor LT and 59 cases of deceased-donor LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was diagnosed in 232 (71.2%) of these subjects. Antiviral agents were used in 255 patients (78.2%) prior to LT. HBV DNA was undetectable in 69 cases (21.2%) and detectable over wide concentrations in the other 257 patients (78.8%) prior to LT. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the store blood samples detected HBV DNA in all patients, with 159 patients (48.9%) showing concentrations > 100 IU/mL. Post-transplant HBV regimens during the first year included combination therapy in 196 (60.1%), hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy in 121 (37.1%), and antiviral monotherapy in 9 (2.8%). In the second post-transplant year, these regimens had changed to combination therapy in 187 (57.4%), HBIG monotherapy in 112 (34.4%), and antiviral monotherapy in 27 (8.3%). Trough antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen titers > 500 IU/mL and >1,000 IU/mL were observed in 61.7% and 25.2%, respectively. The mean simulative half-life of HBIG was 21.6 ± 4.3 days with a median 17.7 days. Up to 2-year follow-up period, HCC recurrence and HBV recurrence developed in 18 (5.5%) and 6 (1.8%), respectively. HCC recurrence developed in 3 of 6 patients with HBV recurrence.CONCLUSION: Combination therapy is the mainstay of HBV prophylaxis protocols in a majority of Korean LT centers, but HBIG was often administered excessively. Individualized optimization of HBIG treatments using SHL is necessary to adjust the HBIG infusion interval.
Antiviral Agents
;
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
;
Cohort Studies
;
DNA
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Half-Life
;
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens
;
Hepatitis B virus
;
Hepatitis B
;
Hepatitis
;
Humans
;
Immunoglobulins
;
Korea
;
Liver Transplantation
;
Liver
;
Organ Transplantation
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Recurrence
;
Transplants
6.Hepatitis B Prophylaxis after Liver Transplantation in Korea: Analysis of the KOTRY Database
Gil Chun PARK ; Shin HWANG ; Myoung Soo KIM ; Dong Hwan JUNG ; Gi Won SONG ; Kwang Woong LEE ; Jong Man KIM ; Jae Geun LEE ; Je Ho RYU ; Dong Lak CHOI ; Hee Jung WANG ; Bong Wan KIM ; Dong Sik KIM ; Yang Won NAH ; Young Kyoung YOU ; Koo Jeong KANG ; Hee Chul YU ; Yo Han PARK ; Kyung Jin LEE ; Yun Kyu KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(6):e36-
BACKGROUND:
Prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence is essential after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-associated recipients. We conducted real-world analysis of HBV prophylaxis after LT in the Korean population.
METHODS:
Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) database and additionally collected data (n = 326) were analyzed with special reference to types of HBV prophylaxis.
RESULTS:
The study cohort comprised 267 cases of living-donor LT and 59 cases of deceased-donor LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was diagnosed in 232 (71.2%) of these subjects. Antiviral agents were used in 255 patients (78.2%) prior to LT. HBV DNA was undetectable in 69 cases (21.2%) and detectable over wide concentrations in the other 257 patients (78.8%) prior to LT. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of the store blood samples detected HBV DNA in all patients, with 159 patients (48.9%) showing concentrations > 100 IU/mL. Post-transplant HBV regimens during the first year included combination therapy in 196 (60.1%), hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy in 121 (37.1%), and antiviral monotherapy in 9 (2.8%). In the second post-transplant year, these regimens had changed to combination therapy in 187 (57.4%), HBIG monotherapy in 112 (34.4%), and antiviral monotherapy in 27 (8.3%). Trough antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen titers > 500 IU/mL and >1,000 IU/mL were observed in 61.7% and 25.2%, respectively. The mean simulative half-life of HBIG was 21.6 ± 4.3 days with a median 17.7 days. Up to 2-year follow-up period, HCC recurrence and HBV recurrence developed in 18 (5.5%) and 6 (1.8%), respectively. HCC recurrence developed in 3 of 6 patients with HBV recurrence.
CONCLUSION
Combination therapy is the mainstay of HBV prophylaxis protocols in a majority of Korean LT centers, but HBIG was often administered excessively. Individualized optimization of HBIG treatments using SHL is necessary to adjust the HBIG infusion interval.
7.Bortezomib Treatment for Refractory Antibody-Mediated Rejection Superimposed with BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy during the Progression of Recurrent C3 Glomerulonephritis.
Wonseok DO ; Jong Hak LEE ; Kyung Joo KIM ; Man Hoon HAN ; Hee Yeon JUNG ; Ji Young CHOI ; Sun Hee PARK ; Yong Lim KIM ; Chan Duck KIM ; Jang Hee CHO ; Youngae YANG ; Minjung KIM ; Inryang HWANG ; Kyu Yeun KIM ; Taehoon YIM ; Yong Jin KIM
The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation 2018;32(3):57-62
A 38-year-old man, who underwent a second kidney transplantation (KT), was admitted because of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) complicated by BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN). He was placed on hemodialysis at the age of 24 years because of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. At the age of 28 years, he underwent a living donor KT from his father; however, 1 year after the transplantation, he developed a recurrence of the primary glomerular disease, resulting in graft failure 2 years after the first KT. Ten years later, he received a deceased-donor kidney with a B-cell-positive-cross-match. He received 600 mg of rituximab before the KT with three cycles of plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin (0.5 g/kg) therapy after KT. During the follow-up, the first and second allograft biopsies at 4 and 10 months after KT revealed AMR with a recurrence of primary glomerular disease that was reclassified as C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN). He received a steroid pulse, rituximab, plasmapheresis, and immunoglobulin therapies. The third allograft biopsy demonstrated that the BKVAN was complicated with AMR and C3GN. As the azotemia did not improve after repeated conventional therapies for AMR, one cycle of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m²×4 doses) was administered. The allograft function stabilized, and BK viremia became undetectable after 6 months. The present case suggests that bortezomib therapy may be applicable to patients with refractory AMR, even in cases complicated with BKVAN.
Adult
;
Allografts
;
Azotemia
;
Biopsy
;
BK Virus
;
Bortezomib*
;
Fathers
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Glomerulonephritis*
;
Glomerulonephritis, Membranoproliferative
;
Graft Rejection
;
Humans
;
Immunization, Passive
;
Immunoglobulins
;
Kidney
;
Kidney Transplantation
;
Living Donors
;
Plasmapheresis
;
Recurrence
;
Renal Dialysis
;
Rituximab
;
Transplants
;
Viremia
8.MiR-9 Controls Chemotactic Activity of Cord Blood CD34⁺ Cells by Repressing CXCR4 Expression
Tae Won HA ; Hyun Soo KANG ; Tae Hee KIM ; Ji Hyun KWON ; Hyun Kyu KIM ; Aeli RYU ; Hyeji JEON ; Jaeseok HAN ; Hal E BROXMEYER ; Yongsung HWANG ; Yun Kyung LEE ; Man Ryul LEE
International Journal of Stem Cells 2018;11(2):187-195
Improved approaches for promoting umbilical cord blood (CB) hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) homing are clinically important to enhance engraftment of CB-HSCs. Clinical transplantation of CB-HSCs is used to treat a wide range of disorders. However, an improved understanding of HSC chemotaxis is needed for facilitation of the engraftment process. We found that ectopic overexpression of miR-9 and antisense-miR-9 respectively down- and up-regulated C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) expression in CB-CD34⁺ cells as well as in 293T and TF-1 cell lines. Since CXCR4 is a specific receptor for the stromal cell derived factor-1 (SDF-1) chemotactic factor, we investigated whether sense miR-9 and antisense miR-9 influenced CXCR4-mediated chemotactic mobility of primary CB CD34⁺ cells and TF-1 cells. Ectopic overexpression of sense miR-9 and antisense miR-9 respectively down- and up-regulated SDF-1-mediated chemotactic cell mobility. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report that miR-9 may play a role in regulating CXCR4 expression and SDF-1-mediated chemotactic activity of CB CD34⁺ cells.
Cell Line
;
Cell Movement
;
Chemotaxis
;
Fetal Blood
;
Hematopoietic Stem Cells
;
MicroRNAs
;
Stromal Cells
9.Relationship between Neutrophil-lymphocyte, Platelet-lymphocyte Ratio and Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity.
Sung Jun KIM ; Ji Hyun LEE ; Seong Man KIM ; Min Gi PARK ; Su Ho PARK ; Dong Kyu KIM ; Ji Yeon HWANG ; Joon Sul CHOI ; Suk Ki PARK
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2016;23(2):96-100
OBJECTIVE: Although previous trials suggested a relationship between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic inflammatory response, clinical utility of NLR and PLR in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is not well defined. This study was conducted to assess the efficiency of NLR and PLR as an inflammatory index in patients with RA. METHODS: A total of 107 patients with newly diagnosed RA who had never used steroid and a control group of 50 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects whose high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was within normal range were included. Those with cerebrovascular diseases, diabetes, malignancies, or any cardiovascular diseases were excluded from both groups. The patients were divided into two groups according to the Disease Activity Score of 28 joints (DAS28). Group 1 included patients with a DAS28 score of 3.2 and lower (low disease activity) and group 2 included patients with a score higher than 3.2 (moderate to high disease activity). RESULTS: NLR and PLR in the patient group were 2.99±2.04, 170.90±86.49, significantly higher than that of the control group. NLR and PLR in group 2 were 4.16±2.50, 225.23±93.21, significantly higher than those of group 1 patients (2.26±1.22, 137.15±61.92). NLR and PLR both showed correlation with rheumatoid factor, hsCRP, serum albumin, Korean Heath Assesment Questionnaire, and DAS28. CONCLUSION: These data showed a positive correlation between NLR or PLR level and RA disease activity, suggesting that NLR or PLR can be used as an additional inflammatory marker in patients with RA.
Arthritis, Rheumatoid*
;
C-Reactive Protein
;
Cardiovascular Diseases
;
Equidae
;
Humans
;
Joints
;
Reference Values
;
Rheumatoid Factor
;
Serum Albumin
10.Comparison of the antigenic relationship between Japanese encephalitis virus genotypes 1 and 3.
Bo Kyu KANG ; Jeong Min HWANG ; Hyoungjoon MOON ; Sang Yoon HAN ; Jong Man KIM ; Dong Kun YANG ; Bong Kyun PARK ; Daesub SONG
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research 2016;5(1):26-30
PURPOSE: The Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) genotype circulating in Korea has changed from G3 to G1. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the antigenic relationship between the two genotypes by using antibody tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples from 42 sows and 216 horses were collected, and their seroprevalence was monitored using the hemagglutination inhibition and virus neutralization tests. Antisera against JEV G1 and G3 were isolated and prepared from guinea pigs. The cross-reactivity of these two viruses was then compared using the neutralizing antibody test. RESULTS: We found that there was a difference in the seropositive ratios of JEV G1 and G3. However, the difference was dependent on the antibody test used. There was also an observed difference in the antigenicity between the two genotypes, as ascertained using the neutralizing antibody test. CONCLUSION: There is an evident difference in JEV antigenicity between the genotypes G1 and G3. Therefore, we propose monitoring of the seroprevalence of JEV, and reevaluating the antigenicity of the current vaccine by using the relevant tests.
Animals
;
Antibodies, Neutralizing
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group*
;
Cross Reactions
;
Encephalitis Virus, Japanese*
;
Encephalitis, Japanese*
;
Genotype
;
Guinea Pigs
;
Hemagglutination
;
Horses
;
Humans
;
Immune Sera
;
Korea
;
Neutralization Tests
;
Seroepidemiologic Studies

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail