Purpose: Numerous studies have focused on techniques for detecting foreign bodies in soft tissue in the hand, but removal remains a subject of interest. In this study, we describe the microscope-assisted removal of foreign bodies in the hand. Methods: We reviewed records of patients treated for foreign bodies in the hand at our department from July 2013 to May 2023. In 16 patients aged 23 to 55 years, the following variables were analyzed: the cause of trauma; the time interval from trauma to surgery; the location, type, size, and number of foreign bodies; patient complaints; imaging technique; and procedure type. Under local anesthesia, a slit incision was made at the suspected site. Foreign bodies were completely removed using micro-instruments under microscopic guidance. Results: Stab injuries were the most common (n=13), and there was one case each of abrasion, traffic accident, and bee sting. The middle finger (n=5) was the most affected, followed by the thumb (n=4), index (n=3), little finger (n=2), ring finger (n=1), and palm (n=1). Foreign bodies included glass (n=6), wood (n=4), seashell (n=2), fish bone, a pencil tip, a bee stinger, and metal. Their size ranged from 1 to 20 mm. Patient complaints included a foreign body sensation, localized pain, swelling, discoloration, and a skin lesion. X-ray examinations were performed in all cases, and ultrasonography was conducted in five cases. Conclusion A microscopic approach allows precise, safe, and complete removal of foreign bodies without tissue damage, highlighting the efficacy of this technique in hand surgery.

Purpose: Numerous studies have focused on techniques for detecting foreign bodies in soft tissue in the hand, but removal remains a subject of interest. In this study, we describe the microscope-assisted removal of foreign bodies in the hand. Methods: We reviewed records of patients treated for foreign bodies in the hand at our department from July 2013 to May 2023. In 16 patients aged 23 to 55 years, the following variables were analyzed: the cause of trauma; the time interval from trauma to surgery; the location, type, size, and number of foreign bodies; patient complaints; imaging technique; and procedure type. Under local anesthesia, a slit incision was made at the suspected site. Foreign bodies were completely removed using micro-instruments under microscopic guidance. Results: Stab injuries were the most common (n=13), and there was one case each of abrasion, traffic accident, and bee sting. The middle finger (n=5) was the most affected, followed by the thumb (n=4), index (n=3), little finger (n=2), ring finger (n=1), and palm (n=1). Foreign bodies included glass (n=6), wood (n=4), seashell (n=2), fish bone, a pencil tip, a bee stinger, and metal. Their size ranged from 1 to 20 mm. Patient complaints included a foreign body sensation, localized pain, swelling, discoloration, and a skin lesion. X-ray examinations were performed in all cases, and ultrasonography was conducted in five cases. Conclusion A microscopic approach allows precise, safe, and complete removal of foreign bodies without tissue damage, highlighting the efficacy of this technique in hand surgery.

Purpose: Numerous studies have focused on techniques for detecting foreign bodies in soft tissue in the hand, but removal remains a subject of interest. In this study, we describe the microscope-assisted removal of foreign bodies in the hand. Methods: We reviewed records of patients treated for foreign bodies in the hand at our department from July 2013 to May 2023. In 16 patients aged 23 to 55 years, the following variables were analyzed: the cause of trauma; the time interval from trauma to surgery; the location, type, size, and number of foreign bodies; patient complaints; imaging technique; and procedure type. Under local anesthesia, a slit incision was made at the suspected site. Foreign bodies were completely removed using micro-instruments under microscopic guidance. Results: Stab injuries were the most common (n=13), and there was one case each of abrasion, traffic accident, and bee sting. The middle finger (n=5) was the most affected, followed by the thumb (n=4), index (n=3), little finger (n=2), ring finger (n=1), and palm (n=1). Foreign bodies included glass (n=6), wood (n=4), seashell (n=2), fish bone, a pencil tip, a bee stinger, and metal. Their size ranged from 1 to 20 mm. Patient complaints included a foreign body sensation, localized pain, swelling, discoloration, and a skin lesion. X-ray examinations were performed in all cases, and ultrasonography was conducted in five cases. Conclusion A microscopic approach allows precise, safe, and complete removal of foreign bodies without tissue damage, highlighting the efficacy of this technique in hand surgery.