For women who have abnormal Pap test results, the biopsy under colposcopic evaluation is the gold standard for determining the treatment modality. To increase the effectiveness of colposcopic communication, the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) recently published fourth new nomenclature, aiming to create an evidence-based terminology. To increase the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy, multiple biopsies of two or more sites are recommended. Recently, with the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for cervical cancer prevention, pre-cancerous diseases caused by virus types 16 and 18 have been reduced, which is expected to reduce the number of colposcopic examinations and make colposcopic diagnosis more difficult.
Biopsy ; Colposcopy ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Papanicolaou Test ; Papillomaviridae ; Pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive factors for residual/recurrent disease and to analyze the timing for Pap smears and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing during follow-up after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 183 patients (mean age, 39.3 years) with CIN 2/3 who were treated with LEEP. Post-LEEP follow-up was performed by Pap smear and HPV hybrid capture2 (HC2) testing. The definition of persistent/recurrent disease was biopsy-proven CIN 2 or worse. RESULTS: Among 183 patients, punch biopsies were CIN 2 in 31 (16.9%) and CIN 3 in 152 (83.1%). HPV HC2 tests before LEEP were positive in 170 (95.5%) of 178 patients. During follow-up, 12 patients (6.6%) had residual/recurrent CIN 2+. LEEP margin status was a significant predictive factor for persistent/recurrent disease. Other factors such as age, HPV HC2 viral load (> or =100 relative light units), and HPV typing (type 16/18 vs. other types) did not predict recurrence. Early HPV HC2 testing at 3 months after LEEP detected all cases of residual/recurrent disease. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the HPV HC2 test for residual/recurrent disease were both 100% at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: Margin involvement in conization specimens was a significant factor predicting residual/recurrent disease after LEEP. HPV test results at 3 and 6 months after treatment were comparable. Early 3-month follow-up testing after LEEP can offer timely information about residual/recurrent disease and alleviate patient anxiety early about treatment failure.
Anxiety ; Biopsy ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; Chimera ; Conization ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Light ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Failure ; Viral Load

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive factors for residual/recurrent disease and to analyze the timing for Pap smears and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing during follow-up after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 183 patients (mean age, 39.3 years) with CIN 2/3 who were treated with LEEP. Post-LEEP follow-up was performed by Pap smear and HPV hybrid capture2 (HC2) testing. The definition of persistent/recurrent disease was biopsy-proven CIN 2 or worse. RESULTS: Among 183 patients, punch biopsies were CIN 2 in 31 (16.9%) and CIN 3 in 152 (83.1%). HPV HC2 tests before LEEP were positive in 170 (95.5%) of 178 patients. During follow-up, 12 patients (6.6%) had residual/recurrent CIN 2+. LEEP margin status was a significant predictive factor for persistent/recurrent disease. Other factors such as age, HPV HC2 viral load (> or =100 relative light units), and HPV typing (type 16/18 vs. other types) did not predict recurrence. Early HPV HC2 testing at 3 months after LEEP detected all cases of residual/recurrent disease. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of the HPV HC2 test for residual/recurrent disease were both 100% at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: Margin involvement in conization specimens was a significant factor predicting residual/recurrent disease after LEEP. HPV test results at 3 and 6 months after treatment were comparable. Early 3-month follow-up testing after LEEP can offer timely information about residual/recurrent disease and alleviate patient anxiety early about treatment failure.
Anxiety ; Biopsy ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; Chimera ; Conization ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Light ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Failure ; Viral Load

OBJECTIVE: The clearance rate of human papillomavirus (HPV) after conization is generally high, although some HPV infections persist. We investigated the factors that affect the clearance of HPV after conization in patients with negative margins. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients (mean age 39.9 years, range 25 to 51 years) with CIN 2/3 who underwent loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) conization with negative margins. All patients had a Pap smear and high-risk (HR) HPV testing using Hybrid Capture II system and HPV DNA chip before conization. We used> or =1 relative light units (RLUs) as the cutoff for persistence of HPV after conization. RESULTS: High-risk HPV was detected in 73 of 77 (94.8%) patients before conization. At the 6-months follow-up, the high-risk HPV was eliminated in 60 of 73 (82.2%) patients. The HPV persistence rate after conization was 17.8% (13/73). Univariate analysis showed that persistent HPV infection after conization with negative margins was more likely to occur when the pretreatment viral load was high (RLU/positive control >100 (p=0.027) and the HPV was type 16 (p=0.021). Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative HPV type 16 infection was the only significant independent factor (p=0.021) for HPV persistence out of age, cytology, punch biopsy histology, HPV viral load, and conization histology. CONCLUSION: Conization effectively removes HR-HPV infection. HPV type 16 infection before conization was significantly related to HR-HPV persistence after conization with negative margins. Therefore, patients with HPV 16 infection before conization need to be followed closely.
Biopsy ; Chimera ; Conization ; Follow-Up Studies ; Human papillomavirus 16 ; Humans ; Light ; Logistic Models ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Viral Load

OBJECTIVE: Absence of dysplasia in the excised specimen following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 is an occasional finding of uncertain clinical significance. We evaluated several factors including age, liquid-based Pap (LBP) test, human papillomavirus (HPV) load before treatment, and HPV typing as predictors for absence of dysplasia. Absence of dysplasia in LEEP specimens was analyzed in terms of factors for recurrent disease after LEEP conization METHODS: In total, 192 women (mean age, 39.3+/-8.4 years; range, 24 to 70 years) with biopsy-proven CIN 2/3 were treated by LEEP conization. Age, LBP test, histological grade, HPV load, and HPV DNA typing were evaluated as possible predictors of the absence of residual dysplasia or recurrent disease. RESULTS: Of the LEEP specimens, 34 (17.7%) showed no dysplasia in preoperative biopsies from patients with proven CIN 2/3. Low HPV load (<100 relative light units [RLU]) was significantly related to the absence of dysplasia in LEEP specimens, using logistic regression. Margin involvement and high HPV load (> or =400 RLU) were significant factors for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Absence of dysplasia in LEEP specimens occurred in 17.7% of our specimens. Prediction of the absence of dysplasia in LEEP specimens was associated with low HPV load. Residual/recurrent disease after LEEP was associated with a positive resection margin and high viral load, and was not associated with absence of dysplasia in LEEP specimens. Even if there is no dysplasia in conization specimens, close follow-up for residual/recurrent disease is needed.
Biopsy ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ; Cervix Uteri ; Conization ; DNA Fingerprinting ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Light ; Logistic Models ; Recurrence ; Viral Load