1.Clinical features and prognosis of in-stent restenosis after drug eluting stent implantation
Kunlin ZHOU ; Hongyu SHI ; Hui CHEN ; Xingbiao QIU ; Xinkai QU ; Weiyi FANG
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine 2013;(13):12-15
Objective To evaluate the clinical features of in-stent restenosis after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation and investigate the relationship between different patterns of DES restenostic lesions and long-term prognosis.Methods All scoronary heart disease patients who underwent repeated pereutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for DES in-stent restenosis from September 2006 to December 2009 were enrolled.All patients were divided into focal group and non-focal group according to the pattern of restenosis.All patients were prospectively followed up for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including death,repeat PCI and myocardial infarction.Results Totally 88 patients (40 with focal restenosis,48 with non-focal restenosis) were enrolled.There were no significant differences between two groups in age,gender,risk factors,clinical presentation and medical therapy (P > 0.05).Compared with that in focal group,the patients in non-focal group had a higher portion of in-segment restenosis [58.3% (28/48) vs.12.5%(5/40),P< 0.01],higher stenosis rate [(78.1 ± 10.0)% vs.(70.0 ± 9.7)%,P < 0.01],more need for another DES[81.2%(39/48) vs.17.5%(7/40),P< 0.01],and longer stent implanted [(25.0 ± 7.0) mm vs.(17.4 ±3.4) mm,P <0.01].After following up for (2.2 ± 1.0) years,there were no significant differences between two groups in MACE and each component (P > 0.05),however,compared with that in focal group,there was a trend of increase in MACE in non-focal group[22.9%(11/48) vs.10.0%(4/40),P=0.092].Conclusion It suggests that patients with non-focal restenosis have a more severe lesion angiographically,which usually results in another DES implanted,and has a worse long-term prognosis.
2.Effect of ultrasonic microbubbles combined with gentamicin in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer under low-frequency ultrasound
Chenxi LI ; Pan LI ; Ting JIANG ; Kunlin SHI ; Jianchun ZONG
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography 2023;32(4):354-360
Objective:To investigate the effect of microbubbles combined with gentamicin on the clearance of bacterial biofilms and the healing of diabetic foot ulcers under low-frequency ultrasound.Methods:From July 2021 to June 2022, 27 patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers complicated with infection were prospectively selected from the Trauma Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. The patients were divided into low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles + gentamicin ointment group, low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles group, and gentamicin ointment group by using a random number table, with 9 patients in each group. The three groups were all treated with simple debridement by the same surgeon.Afterward, in the low-frequency ultrasound+ microbubbles+ gentamicin ointment group, the wounds covered by 4% microbubble suspension were firstly irradiated with low-intensity focused ultrasound for 5 min, and then evenly applied with gentamicin ointment. In the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles group, the wounds covered by 4% microbubble suspension were irradiated with low-intensity focused ultrasound for 5 min. The gentamicin ointment group was treated with gentamicin ointment evenly. The treatment lasted for 2 weeks, and secretions and tissue specimens were collected during and 2 weeks after the treatment, respectively. The general indexes of wound surface (including ulcer depth score, secretion exudation score, fresh granulation tissue growth score, and total index score), ulcer area, ulcer healing rate, as well as negative rate of secretion culture were compared among the three groups after treatment. Additionally, the structural changes in bacterial biofilms under a scanning electron microscope and colony count under a laser confocal scanning microscope were compared among the three groups after treatment.Results:No significant differences were found in the general datas among the three groups (all P>0.05). After treatment for 2 weeks, the overall general indexes showed statistically and significant differences among the three groups (all P<0.05). Each index score in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles + gentamicin ointment group was lower than that in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles group and the gentamicin ointment group (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in overall ulcer area among the three groups ( P>0.05). The overall ulcer healing rate presented significant differences among the three groups ( P<0.05). The healing rate in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles + gentamicin ointment group was higher than that in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles group and the gentamicin ointment group (all P<0.05). The overall negative rates of secretion culture among the three groups were significantly different ( P<0.05), the negative rate in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles + gentamicin ointment group was higher than that in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles group and the gentamicin ointment group (all P<0.05). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed bacterial biofilm infection in the three groups before treatment. After treatment for 2 weeks, the biofilm formation in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles + gentamicin ointment group reduced significantly, while the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles group and the gentamicin ointment group had little change compared with that before treatment. Significant differences were detected in total colony count among the three groups under the confocal microscope ( P<0.05). The colony count in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles + gentamicin ointment group was lower than that in the low-frequency ultrasound + microbubbles group and the gentamicin ointment group (both P<0.05). Conclusions:Ultrasound microbubbles combined with gentamicin can clear bacterial biofilms and promote the healing of diabetic foot ulcers.
3.Initial experience of ileal ureter replacement combined with augmentation cystoplasty in the treatment of ureteral stenosis with contracted bladder
Kunlin YANG ; Yuye WU ; Guangpu DING ; Yukun CAI ; Wei SHI ; Junsheng BAO ; Wenfeng GUAN ; Zi'ao LI ; Shubo FAN ; Wanqiang LI ; Lei ZHANG ; Xuesong LI ; Liqun ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Urology 2019;40(6):416-421
Objective To explore the availability and safety of ileal ureter replacement combined with ileal augmentation cystoplasty in treating ureteral stenosis with contracted bladder.Methods From August 2015 to November 2018,three patients who underwent ileal ureter replacement combined with augmentation cystoplasty were treated with ileal ureter replacement combined with augmentation cystoplasty.There were 1 male and 2 females with the age ranging from 34 to 55 years (mean 39 years).Two patients suffered from left ureter stenosis,and one patient had stenosis on the both sides.The length of the ureter stenosis ranged from 6 to 18 cm (mean 9.8 cm).The preoperative bladder capacity ranged from 60 to 150 ml (mean 103.3 ml).In the surgery,part of ileum was used to replace the ureter,and the distal intestine was made into U-shape to enlarge the bladder.Results All operation were completed successfully.The operation time ranged from 220 to 400 min (mean 303.0 min),and the blood loss ranged from 150 to 500 ml (mean 283.3 ml).Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 1 case and open surgery in 2 cases.Three weeks after the surgery,the bladder volume underwent cystography ranged from 300 to 400 ml (mean 360.0 ml).Three months after the surgery,the postvoid residual urine volume ranged from 20 to 50 ml (mean 33.3 ml).Postoperative frequency and urgency of urine were completely relieved in 1 case,alleviated in 2 cases.Flank pain was completely relieved in 1 case,and alleviated in 2 cases postoperatively.The serum creatinine of 2 patients mildly increased after the surgery,while 1 patient remained stable.For complications,1 patient had urinary infection,and 1 patient suffered from metabolic acidosis.Conclusions Ileal ureteral replacement combined with augmentation cystoplasty can be the choice of treatment for long segment ureteral stenosis and enlarge the bladder simultaneously.The postoperative complications and the kidney functions should be regularly followed up.