PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare similarities and differences in research trends for community health nursing between Korea and Japan. METHODS: Comparison was made in terms of research design, data collection and sampling method, and key concepts from community health nursing research by literature review. We analyzed original articles from representative Journals covering community health nursing research from 2004 to 2008. RESULTS: We found that research design was quite different between the two countries. Quantitative research design was dominant in Korea, while qualitative and qualitative research designs were used equally in Japan. In particular, outcome research was found only in Korean papers. CONCLUSION: Based on the comparison, the following recommendations are suggested related to the strengths and weaknesses of research concepts and methods observed in each country. It is suggested that future collaboration should be undertaken especially to improve the diversity of research design and method. More diverse research designs should be used in both countries. Particularly in today's aged society, evidence-based research and outcome research are needed for community health nursing in both countries.
Community Health Nursing* ; Cooperative Behavior ; Data Collection ; Japan* ; Korea* ; Qualitative Research ; Research Design

Four hundred and six soil samples collected from five schoolyards in Mai Trung Commune, Bac Giang Province, Northern Vietnam, from 2005 to 2007 were examined for helminth eggs using a sucrose centrifugal flotation method. The soils around latrines was found to be heavily contaminated with Ascaris sp. eggs. The contamination rate of Ascaris sp. eggs at each school and prevalence of ascariasis among the school children showed a positive correlation (P&It;0.05). This indicated that examination of soil from the area around latrines for Ascaris sp. eggs is a useful method to estimate the prevalence of ascariasis among school children.

We devised IMADOKO as a tool to confirm the current status of terminal cancer patients and are using it in the home care team. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the actual state of end-of-life care to clarify the impact of IMADOKO on decision-making support for terminal cancer patients and their families. The subjects were 64patients (male/female, 38/26) before IMADOKO introduction, and 140 patients (male/female, 78/62) after the introduction, with an average age of 74 years in both cases and the primary lesions were the pancreas, lung, and the gastrointestinal tract. The rate of death at home increased significantly after the introduction of IMADOKO, compared to before. In the IMADOKO introduced group, IMADOKO was used in 108 patients and all their families. The use of IMADOKO for the patient was not related to the location of death, but it significantly improved communication between the patient and family, and between patient/patient's family and medical staff. It was shown that IMADOKO may be useful for decision-making support in choosing a better place of recuperation.