1.Identification of Synthetic Cannabinoid New Psychoactive Substances 4F-MDMB-BUTINACA and MDMB-4en-PINACA.
Kua Dou WANG ; Xiao Liang YUAN ; Yu Rong ZHANG ; Jun Jian HU ; Fang Qi CAO ; Yong Sheng CHEN
Journal of Forensic Medicine 2021;37(4):505-510
Objective To establish a method that combines a series of techniques including Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FTIR), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), high resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) for identification of unknown substances. Methods The unknown samples (off-white powder and yellow crystal) seized in the actual cases were detected by FTIR, GC-MS (methanol as solvent), high resolution mass spectrometry (methanol as solvent) and NMR (deuterated methanol as solvent). Results The mass spectrum characteristic ions m/z of the main components in the samples measured by GC-MS were 219 (base peak), 363, 307, 304, 275, 145, 131 and 213 (base peak), 357, 301, 298, 269, 185, 171, 145 and 131, respectively. The accurate mass numbers [M+H]+ measured by high resolution mass spectrometry were 364.203 61 and 358.212 34, respectively. The unknown samples were identified as synthetic cannabinoid new psychoactive substances 4F-MDMB-BUTINACA and MDMB-4en-PINACA after data consultation and database retrieval and comparison, combined with infrared analysis and mass spectrometry data analysis, and their structures were confirmed by 1H-NMR. Conclusion The established multi-technology joint identification method can be used to identify 4F-MDMB-BUTINACA and MDMB-4en-PINACA in unknown samples. This method is fast, convenient, accurate, reliable and practical, and can provide reference for the identification of cases involving such substances in the future.
Cannabinoids
;
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
;
Illicit Drugs
;
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
;
Mass Spectrometry
2.Identification of the New Psychoactive Substance Dibutylone.
Kua Dou WANG ; Fang Qi CAO ; Xue JIANG ; Hong CHEN ; Xie Liang YUAN ; Yong Sheng CHEN ; Jun Jian HU
Journal of Forensic Medicine 2019;35(6):682-686
Objective To establish a method to identify unknown samples based on combined use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum (NMR) technique. Methods The unknown samples were dissolved in methanol solution containing internal standard SKF525A and detected by GC-MS and HRMS. The mixed samples were separated and purified by silica gel column chromatography, and then dissolved in methanol-d4 solution for structural analysis of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H NMR). Results The characteristic fragment ions (m/z) were 86.1 (base peak), 71.2, 121.1, and 149.0, and the accurate mass number of molecular ion peak was measured by HRMS to be 236.128 89. By combined use of data analysis and database comparison, a new psychoactive substance of the cathinone class, Dibutylone, was detected in the sample, and the sample also contained a small amount of caffeine. The sample was purified, then identified using 1H NMR, and was further confirmed to be Dibutylone. In addition, the GC-MS retention time and characteristic fragment ions of the main components of the sample were consistent with those of Dibutylone reference material. Conclusion The method established in this study can be used for the identification of Dibutylone in mixed samples.
Chromatography, Liquid
;
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
;
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
;
Mass Spectrometry
;
N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/isolation & purification*
;
Psychotropic Drugs/chemistry*
3.Overexpression of NAT10 induced platinum drugs resistance in breast cancer cell.
Pan QI ; Ya Ke CHEN ; Rui Li CUI ; Rui Juan HENG ; Sheng XU ; Xiao Ying HE ; Ai Min YUE ; Jiang Kun KANG ; Hao Han LI ; Yong Xin ZHU ; Cong WANG ; Yu Lu CHEN ; Kua HU ; Yan Yan YIN ; Li Xue XUAN ; Yu SONG
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2022;44(6):540-549
Objective: To observe the platinum drugs resistance effect of N-acetyltransferase 10 (NAT10) overexpression in breast cancer cell line and elucidate the underlining mechanisms. Methods: The experiment was divided into wild-type (MCF-7 wild-type cells without any treatment) group, NAT10 overexpression group (H-NAT10 plasmid transfected into MCF-7 cells) and NAT10 knockdown group (SH-NAT10 plasmid transfected into MCF-7 cells). The invasion was detected by Transwell array, the interaction between NAT10 and PARP1 was detected by co-immunoprecipitation. The impact of NAT10 overexpression or knockdown on the acetylation level of PARP1 and its half-life was also determined. Immunostaining and IP array were used to detect the recruitment of DNA damage repair protein by acetylated PARP1. Flow cytometry was used to detect the cell apoptosis. Results: Transwell invasion assay showed that the number of cell invasion was 483.00±46.90 in the NAT10 overexpression group, 469.00±40.50 in the NAT10 knockdown group, and 445.00±35.50 in the MCF-7 wild-type cells, and the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the presence of 10 μmol/L oxaliplatin, the number of cell invasion was 502.00±45.60 in the NAT10 overexpression group and 105.00±20.50 in the NAT10 knockdown group, both statistically significant (P<0.05) compared with 219.00±31.50 in wild-type cells. In the presence of 10 μmol/L oxaliplatin, NAT10 overexpression enhanced the binding of PARP1 to NAT10 compared with wild-type cells, whereas the use of the NAT10 inhibitor Remodelin inhibited the mutual binding of the two. Overexpression of NAT10 induced PARP1 acetylation followed by increased PARP1 binding to XRCC1, and knockdown of NAT10 expression reduced PARP1 binding to XRCC1. Overexpression of NAT10 enhanced PARP1 binding to LIG3, while knockdown of NAT10 expression decreased PARP1 binding to LIG3. In 10 μmol/L oxaliplatin-treated cells, the γH2AX expression level was 0.38±0.02 in NAT10 overexpressing cells and 1.36±0.15 in NAT10 knockdown cells, both statistically significant (P<0.05) compared with 1.00±0.00 in wild-type cells. In 10 μmol/L oxaliplatin treated cells, the apoptosis rate was (6.54±0.68)% in the NAT10 overexpression group and (12.98±2.54)% in the NAT10 knockdown group, both of which were statistically significant (P<0.05) compared with (9.67±0.37)% in wild-type cells. Conclusion: NAT10 overexpression enhances the binding of NAT10 to PARP1 and promotes the acetylation of PARP1, which in turn prolongs the half-life of PARP1, thus enhancing PARP1 recruitment of DNA damage repair related proteins to the damage sites, promoting DNA damage repair and ultimately the survival of breast cancer cells.
Breast Neoplasms/enzymology*
;
Cell Line, Tumor
;
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
;
Female
;
Humans
;
MCF-7 Cells
;
N-Terminal Acetyltransferases/metabolism*
;
Organoplatinum Compounds/pharmacology*
;
Oxaliplatin/pharmacology*
;
X-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1