1.A comparison between dialysis versus conservative management as modes of treatment in the management of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease: A systematic review.
Vega-Alava Kristine Mae ; Luz Vimar A.
Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine 2016;54(4):1-6
BACKGROUND: The number of elderly patients reaching end-stage renal disease is increasing over time. This subset of patients and their families, as well as nephrologists and other physicians, have to make a difficult decision whether or not to start dialysis. Hence, evidences are needed to guide them in their decision-making for or against dialysis, especially in those patients affected by multiple comorbidities for which dialysis may not increase survival or may not improve the quality of life.
METHODS: Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for records in English from the year 2004 to 2014 using the following terms: End-stage Renal Disease, Dialysis, Conservative Management and Elderly.Bibliographies of included articles were also reviewed.All studies identified during the database search were assessed for relevance to the review based on the information provided in the title and abstract. Full copies of the articles were retrieved for all the studies that met the inclusion criteria. Data from all the chosen articles were then carefully appraised to come up with a descriptive analysis.
RESULTS:Seven studies were included in this systematic review. In studies on survival rates, it was found that dialysis prolongs survival in the elderly more than that of the conservative management with a median survival of 39.5 months versus 18.9 months, respectively. However, it was observed that there is no significant difference in the survival rates between the two treatment modalities in patients who have multiple comorbid conditions. In terms of quality of life, there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups. However, patients who chose dialysis have lower satisfaction with life scale score and patients who opted for conservative management scored higher in terms of mental health and social functioning as compared to those who chose dialysis. Moreover, patients managed with conservative management have less hospitalization rates and they most likely die at home or in a hospice. Thus, while patients may live longer with dialysis, they can expect to spend a significant proportion of that time in a medical setting. Patients and their families differ at how they prioritize between prolonging life versus maximizing time at home and these preferences are important to elicit when discussing dialysis initiation.
CONCLUSION: In patients 70 years and above with end-stage renal disease,dialysis offers a higher survival rate over conservative management. However, the survival advantage of dialysis is substantially reduced by the number of comorbid conditions most especially ischemic heart disease. Furthermore, in this subset of patients, those who chose to maximize conservative management maintained quality of life comparable with those patients on long-term dialysis but with more hospital-free days and higher life satisfaction.These findings show that conservative management is a valid treatment option for selected patients.
Survival Rate ; Mental Health ; Nephrologists ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; Life Support Care ; Myocardial Ischemia ; Hospitalization
2.The effect of Whey Protein Supplementation on duration of Mechanical Ventilation: A pilot study
Kristine Mae Vega-Alava ; Rosa Allyn G. Sy
Philippine Journal of Internal Medicine 2018;56(2):71-76
Introduction:
It is important to wean mechanically-ventilated patients as early as possible to avoid complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia. Supplementing the diet with additional protein may help to stimulate muscle protein synthesis which may enhance respiratory muscle function and ventilator drive. This study aims to determine the effect of whey protein supplementation on the duration of mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit patients of Ospital ng Makati.
Methods:
We enrolled forty eligible patients in this openlabel randomized controlled trial and were assigned into two groups: Group A (N=20): patients were given enteral feeding using commercial formula with added whey protein, given as one serving every eight hours (equivalent to 18 g of additional protein per day) and Group B (N=20): patients were given enteral feeding using commercial formula alone. Weaning was started as soon as the patient fulfilled the criteria of spontaneous breathing trial and was considered successful if the patient maintained these criteria for 48 hours after extubation.
Results:
Our study’s results showed that the mechanically intubated patients in Group A have lesser ventilatordependent days with an average of 5.4 days as compared to those in Group B with an average of 7.45 days (p=0.00). Patients in Group A were also noted to have statistically significant higher increase in serum albumin, mid-arm circumference and triceps skin fold from baseline. Twentyfive percent of patients in Group B developed ventilator acquired pneumonia and none in Group A. No mortality was noted in both groups.
Conclusion
Whey protein supplementation in mechanically ventilated patients can be recommended to facilitate early weaning because of its effect on early muscle protein synthesis leading to improvement of lung function and ventilator drive. It can also help in preventing malnutrition and nosocomial infections during critical illness. With all these benefits of whey protein, its use can potentially lead to shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay which can also mean less cost of care delivery.
Whey Proteins
;
Weaning
;
Respiration, Artificial
;
Intensive Care Units
;
Randomized Controlled Trial