Embolization, Therapeutic ; Gastroenterology ; methods ; organization & administration ; Hepatectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Liver ; pathology ; surgery ; Liver Diseases ; diagnosis ; surgery ; Program Development ; Surgical Instruments ; Surgical Procedures, Operative

Biomedical Research ; Humans ; Organ Transplantation ; Postoperative Complications ; Singapore ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; organization & administration

Anemia, Aplastic ; complications ; surgery ; Bone Marrow Transplantation ; Child ; Hepatitis E ; complications ; surgery ; Humans ; Liver Failure, Acute ; complications ; surgery ; Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Tissue Donors ; Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTIONThe revised Human Organ Transplant Act (HOTA) was implemented in Singapore in July 2004. We aim to evaluate expanding the potential donor pool for liver transplant in Singapore with the inclusion of marginal donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODSAll donor referrals between July 2004 and June 2007 were studied. All potential deceased liver donors were heart-beating. After being reviewed by the transplant coordinator, potential donors were assessed by a transplant hepatologist and a transplant surgeon for suitability of organ donation strictly based on the programme's donor assessment protocol. Reasons for rejection as potential donors were documented. The clinical characteristics of all donor referrals were retrospectively reviewed, and an independent decision was made as to whether liver retrieval in each rejected case might have been possible.

RESULTSAmong the 128 potential donor referrals, 20 donors (15.6%) underwent liver retrieval. Of the 20 livers retrieved, 16 were implanted and 4 were not implanted (3 unfit recipients, and 1 donor liver with 40% steatosis). Another 10 donor livers were assessed intraoperatively and were rejected because of varying levels of steatosis. Of these livers assessed, 5 donor livers had steatosis <40% and 5 had steatosis >40%. Of the remaining potential donors, 45 were deemed not possible because of prolonged hypotension (9), on-going or unresolved sepsis (13), high-risk behaviour (4), non-actualisation (8), or pre-existing medical conditions (11). Another 53 donors may potentially have been suitable donors but were rejected because of possible sepsis (13), no suitable recipients (12), transient hypotension (10), transient abnormal liver function test (6), history of alcohol ingestion (5), non-actualisation because of consent (4) and other reasons (3). Overall, it was deemed that 61 donors (47.7%) might potentially have been suitable liver donors.

CONCLUSIONSDespite new legislation (HOTA) in Singapore, the utilisation of cadaveric donor livers showed no increase in the last 3 years. By expanding our donor criteria to include marginal donors, we could potentially increase the availability of deceased donor livers to meet our waiting list demands.

Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Liver Transplantation ; Living Donors ; legislation & jurisprudence ; supply & distribution ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Referral and Consultation ; organization & administration ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; legislation & jurisprudence ; Waiting Lists

INTRODUCTIONMinimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is technically challenging, especially with large posteriorly located tumours or background of liver cirrhosis. This is a case-control study comparing the long-term oncological safety of HCC patients who underwent MIH and open hepatectomy (OH). Most of these patients have liver cirrhosis compared to other studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty patients were divided into 2 groups, 30 underwent MIH and 30 underwent OH for HCC resection. The patients in both groups were matched for extent of tumour resection, age and cirrhosis status. Patient characteristics, risk factors of HCC and all oncological data were studied.

RESULTSNegative resection margins were achieved in 97% of patients in both groups. The mean blood loss during surgery was significantly lower in the MIH group compared to the OH group (361 mL vs 740 mL; 95% CI, 222.2, 734.9; P = 0.04). Hospitalisation is significantly shorter in MIH group (7 days vs 11 days; 95% CI, 6.9, 12.2,; P = 0.04). Eight patients (27%) in the MIH group and 13 patients (43%) in the OH group developed HCC recurrence (P = 0.17). One, 3 and 5 years disease-free survival between MIH and OH groups are 76% vs 55%, 58% vs 47%, and 58% vs 39% respectively (P = 0.18). One, 3 and 5 years overall survival between MIH and OH groups are 93% vs 78%, 89% vs 70%, and 59% vs 65% respectively (P = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONMIH is a safe and feasible curative treatment option for HCC with similar oncological outcomes compared to OH. MIH can be safely performed to remove tumours larger than 5 cm, in cirrhotic liver, as well as centrally and posterior located tumours. In addition, MIH patients have significant shorter hospitalisation and intraoperative blood loss.

Blood Loss, Surgical ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; complications ; pathology ; surgery ; Case-Control Studies ; Disease-Free Survival ; Hepatectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Liver Cirrhosis ; complications ; Liver Neoplasms ; complications ; pathology ; surgery ; Margins of Excision ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; epidemiology ; Tumor Burden