Objective: The efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high cancers has been reported; however, the differences in efficacy according to the subtypes of MSI-high endometrial cancers (ECs) remain unclear. MSI-high ECs are classified into at least 3 groups based on their molecular characteristics: MLH1 hypermethylated, Lynch-like syndrome (LLS)-associated, and Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated cancers. This study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of pembrolizumab differs among these 3 groups, and if so, whether EPM2AIP1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), which correlates with MLH1 promoter methylation, can be used to rule out MLH1 methylation cases. Methods: This study included 12 patients with MSI-high EC who received pembrolizumab treatment. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on MLH1 methylation analysis and the Amsterdam Criteria: MLH1 hypermethylated (sporadic [SP]), LLS-associated, and LS-associated. Patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed, and the efficacy of treatment was evaluated based on the response rate using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results: The overall response rate was 75% (3/4) in the SP group, while it was 100% including one complete response patient in the LLS-associated and the LS-associated group, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of EPM2AIP1 IHC for MLH1 methylation were 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusion Pembrolizumab may be more effective in LLS and LS-associated groups.EPM2AIP1 IHC was less predictive than MLH1 methylation analysis; however, it may be useful for ruling out MLH1 methylation cases due to its high sensitivity. Further studies are needed to determine whether EPM2AIP1 IHC can predict pembrolizumab efficacy.

Objective: The efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high cancers has been reported; however, the differences in efficacy according to the subtypes of MSI-high endometrial cancers (ECs) remain unclear. MSI-high ECs are classified into at least 3 groups based on their molecular characteristics: MLH1 hypermethylated, Lynch-like syndrome (LLS)-associated, and Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated cancers. This study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of pembrolizumab differs among these 3 groups, and if so, whether EPM2AIP1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), which correlates with MLH1 promoter methylation, can be used to rule out MLH1 methylation cases. Methods: This study included 12 patients with MSI-high EC who received pembrolizumab treatment. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on MLH1 methylation analysis and the Amsterdam Criteria: MLH1 hypermethylated (sporadic [SP]), LLS-associated, and LS-associated. Patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed, and the efficacy of treatment was evaluated based on the response rate using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results: The overall response rate was 75% (3/4) in the SP group, while it was 100% including one complete response patient in the LLS-associated and the LS-associated group, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of EPM2AIP1 IHC for MLH1 methylation were 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusion Pembrolizumab may be more effective in LLS and LS-associated groups.EPM2AIP1 IHC was less predictive than MLH1 methylation analysis; however, it may be useful for ruling out MLH1 methylation cases due to its high sensitivity. Further studies are needed to determine whether EPM2AIP1 IHC can predict pembrolizumab efficacy.

Objective: The efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high cancers has been reported; however, the differences in efficacy according to the subtypes of MSI-high endometrial cancers (ECs) remain unclear. MSI-high ECs are classified into at least 3 groups based on their molecular characteristics: MLH1 hypermethylated, Lynch-like syndrome (LLS)-associated, and Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated cancers. This study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of pembrolizumab differs among these 3 groups, and if so, whether EPM2AIP1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), which correlates with MLH1 promoter methylation, can be used to rule out MLH1 methylation cases. Methods: This study included 12 patients with MSI-high EC who received pembrolizumab treatment. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on MLH1 methylation analysis and the Amsterdam Criteria: MLH1 hypermethylated (sporadic [SP]), LLS-associated, and LS-associated. Patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed, and the efficacy of treatment was evaluated based on the response rate using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results: The overall response rate was 75% (3/4) in the SP group, while it was 100% including one complete response patient in the LLS-associated and the LS-associated group, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of EPM2AIP1 IHC for MLH1 methylation were 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Conclusion Pembrolizumab may be more effective in LLS and LS-associated groups.EPM2AIP1 IHC was less predictive than MLH1 methylation analysis; however, it may be useful for ruling out MLH1 methylation cases due to its high sensitivity. Further studies are needed to determine whether EPM2AIP1 IHC can predict pembrolizumab efficacy.