Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital uses an information form created by doctors and pharmacists to provide postoperative information to patients who undergo nephrectomy at the Department of Urology. The form recommends that patients' physicians change prescriptions and adjust medication doses considering post-nephrectomy deterioration of renal function in patients with a single remaining kidney. Of the 7 patients who used this information form, prescription changes were made in 4 patients. An information form jointly created by a physician and pharmacist may affect prescription changes.

Introduction: This study aimed to survey patients on polypharmacy regarding their own intention and inclination to reduce medication use, and their subjective understanding of drug effectiveness and side effects. We aimed to contribute to the establishment of an information base to address polypharmacy.Methods: We enrolled 100 adult patients who had been admitted and administered ≥ 5 oral medications. A questionnaire was utilized to assess their willingness and inclination to reduce their medications, as well as their subjective understanding of drug effectiveness and side effects.Results: Sixty-two patients expressed an intention to reduce their medication use, citing reasons including medication management, drug combinations, and side effects. The proportion of patients with this intention increased as the number of prescribed medications increased. Of the 38 individuals who responded that they had no intention of reducing their medication, 21 (55.3%) cited the reason as being that they received the prescription from a physician. The level of understanding about the effectiveness of their own medications was significantly lower among those aged ≥ 75 years. However, the level of understanding of side effects did not vary based on age or number of prescriptions.Conclusion: To promote the optimization of prescriptions, it is necessary to ascertain patients' intentions, and the relationship between patients and prescribing physicians.

Lenalidomide (LD) was reported to increase the risk of thromboembolism when it was used along with dexamethasone (DEX). Prophylactic administration of antithrombotic drugs against thromboembolism has been recommended for proper use of LD, but none of the recommendation is stated in the package insert. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the usage of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for lenalidomide medication in patients withmultiple myeloma. We used the MDV analyzer to investigate clinical data retrospectively. The investigation period was from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017. Subjects were outpatients aged 20 years or older who were recorded in clinical data as multiple myeloma. There were 7,590 outpatients with multiple myeloma. They were divided into 4 groups by the combined use situation of LD and DEX: LD/DEX non-use group (n＝5,462), DEX alone group (n＝632),LD alone group (n＝203), and LD/DEX together group (n＝1,293), respectively. The prevalence rate of thromboembolism was 7.3% in the DEX alone group and 16.9% in the LD/DEX together group (p＜0.0001). Among the LD/DEX together group, ASA was prescribed at 63.6% in the group without thromboembolism (n＝1,074). The prevalence rate of thromboembolism was higher in the LD/DEX combined group than in the DEX alone group. Considering these findings, risk management for thromboembolism caused by administration of antithrombotic drugs should be considered. It is necessary to create more evidence concerning the necessity of administration of antithrombotic drug in combination with LD/DEX medication.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) employed personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, crucial to protecting themselves from infection. To highlight the efficacy of PPE in preventing environmental infection among HCWs, a systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidance. METHODS: A search of the PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted from January 2019 to April 2021 using pre-defined search terms. Articles were screened by three researchers. The approved papers were read in full and included in this review if relevance was mutually agreed upon. Data were extracted by study design and types of PPEs. RESULTS: 47 of 108 identified studies met the inclusion criteria, with seven reviews and meta-analyses, seven cohort, nine case-control, fifteen cross-sectional studies, four before and after, four case series, and one modeling studies. Wearing PPE offered COVID-19 protection in HCWs but required adequate training. Wearing surgical masks provided improved protection over cloth masks, while the benefit of powered air-purifying respirators is less clear, as are individual gowns, gloves, and/or face shields. CONCLUSIONS Wearing PPE, especially facial masks, is necessary among HCWs, while training in proper use of PPE is also important to prevent COVID-19 infection.
Humans ; COVID-19/prevention & control* ; Pandemics/prevention & control* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Personal Protective Equipment ; Health Personnel