1.17-5 Effects of high concentration carbon-dioxide foot bath on lower extremity function and walking ability in spastic paraplegia: A case report
Keiko IKEDA ; Shuji MATSUMOTO ; Kodai MIYARA ; Tomohiro UEMA ; Takuya HIROKAWA ; Tomokazu NOMA ; Megumi SHIMODOZONO
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine 2014;77(5):550-551
Objectives: Recently, it has been reported that the effects of artificial high concentration carbon-dioxide (CO2) on core temperature, cutaneous blood flow, thermal sensation. However, the effect of artificial high concentration CO2 water foot baths for spasticity, lower extremity motor function and walking ability was not identified. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the newly artificial high concentration CO2 water foot bath inhibits spasticity and improves lower extremity motor function and gait speed in spastic paraplegia patient. Case Presentation: The patient was a 37 years old man with spastic paraplegia of human immunodeficiency virus encephalopathy, without signs of cognitive impairment. The patient was able to walk without assistance using a T-cane or an ankle-foot orthosis. He had no medical condition that limited footbath usage (such as uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, severe joint disability and severe sensory disturbance), severe aphasia that made it impossible to follow verbal instructions, and cognitive dysfunction that interfered with outcome assessments. Informed consent was obtained from him according to the ethical guidelines of the hospital, after he fully understood the purpose and methodology of the study. This work was carried out with permission from the Ethical Committee of Kagoshima University. Methods: This case study was before and after intervention trial. Six outcome instruments were used at baseline and after the artificial high concentration CO2 water foot bath: the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score for the gastrocnemius muscles as a measure of spasticity, ankle clonus, muscle stiffness at triceps muscle of calf, deep body and surface skin temperature as a monitor for physical condition, the active range of motion as an assessment tool for motor function, and the 10-m walk test as a measure of walking ability. Lower-extremity movement acceleration was also measured using an accelerometer. The subject rested in a chair for 10 min and the above-noted physiological reactions during the last 5 min of the resting period were recorded as baseline values. Next, the subject received a 20-min foot bath in water at 38 °C, with a 10-min recovery period. The artificial high concentration CO2 water foot bath improved the acceleration of the spastic lower extremities and this improvement in acceleration lasted for 10 min after the footbath usage. Results: The subject experienced no discomfort before, during or after the intervention, and all assessments were completed safely. The deep body temperature and skin temperature increased immediately after and 10 minutes after the artificial high concentration CO2 water foot baths. The MAS score, ankle clonus and the muscle stiffness for the triceps muscle of calf were decreased. The active range of motion for ankle dorsiflexion and gait speed improved after the 20-min intervention. Conclusion: These findings suggest that artificial high concentration CO2 water foot bath is an effective method for controlling spasticity, and improves motor function and walking ability in spastic paraplegia patients.
2.18-4 Beneficial effects of artificial carbon-dioxide water bathing on the quality of sleep in healthy volunteers: A pilot study
Shuji MATSUMOTO ; Keiko IKEDA ; Kodai MIYARA ; Hirofumi KANO ; Yuji SAKASHITA ; Megumi SHIMODOZONO
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine 2014;77(5):559-560
Objectives: To preliminarily assess the effects of a single warm-water bath (WWB) on the quality of sleep, we measured sleep pattern after WWB in healthy volunteers. The primary objective of the present before-after study was to evaluate whether a single 10-minute WWB at 41°C could modulate sleep pattern in a single group of healthy subjects. In this pilot study, we also assessed the difference in general fatigue and subjects’ satisfaction responses to WWB under two conditions: WWB using tap water (WWB with tap water) and WWB using a bath additive that included inorganic salts and artificial carbon-dioxide (CO2) (WWB with ISCO2). Methods: Eleven healthy volunteers aged 20 to 48 years (29.8±8.9 years, mean ± SD) participated in this study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age 20-50 years; free of cardiovascular disease; not taking medications or supplements. In this within-subject, two-way crossover study, all subjects underwent WWB with tap water or WWB with ISCO2 in random order for two consecutive nights. Objective sleep measures from sleep sensor mat (sleep-scan) and subjective subjects’ reports were collected. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kagoshima University Hospital and written informed consent was obtained from all of the subjects. Results: None of the subjects experienced discomfort before, during or after the study period. The objective sleep measures and subjects’ reports were completed safely in all subjects. WWB with ISCO2 bathing produced significant improvement in objective and subjective sleep latency compared with WWB with tap water bathing (P<0.05). Sleep-scan-determined wake time after sleep onset (WASO), sleep efficiency, and number of awakenings (NA), and patient-reported measures of WASO, NA, sleep quality, sleep depth, and daytime functioning significantly improved following WWB with ISCO2 bathing versus WWB with tap water bathing (P<0.05). WWB with ISCO2 bathing also increased deep sleep time and sleep score (P<0.01 for both comparisons), but did not alter REM or slow-wave sleep. Conclusion: In conclusion, in our group of healthy volunteers, a single warm-water bath was shown to have the potential to modulate the quality of sleep. These findings demonstrate that WWB with ISCO2 bathing might be effective in improving some domains of sleep quality of healthy volunteers, and the subjects showed acceptance towards the intervention. Strengths and limitations of the present study as well as suggestions for further studies were considered. Further evaluations with larger and longer-term randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials based on the present study are needed.
3.06-2 Effects of a whole body vibration as a means for controlling spasticity in post-stroke patients: A F-wave study
Kodai MIYARA ; Shuji MATSUMOTO ; Tomohiro UEMA ; Takuya HIROKAWA ; Tomokazu NOMA ; Keiko IKEDA ; Megumi SHIMODOZONO ; Kazumi KAWAHIRA
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine 2014;77(5):466-467
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the whole body vibration (WBV) inhibits spasticity and improves motor function and walking ability in the hemiplegic legs of post-stroke patients. Patients and Methods: This before-and-after intervention trial examined 13 post-stroke patients (11 male and 2 female; mean age, 54.3 ± 13.0 years; range, 24-72 years). The Brunnstrom Recovery Stage of the hemiplegic lower limb was stage 3 in three patients, stage 4 in 7, stage 5 in three. The modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score for the gastrocnemius muscles was 1 in one case, 1+ in 6 cases and 2 in six cases. All patients had increased muscle tonus of the affected lower limb (MAS score ≥1), and were able to walk without assistance using a T-cane or an ankle-foot orthosis. Exclusion criteria were any medical condition preventing vibratory stimulation (such as uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, severe joint disability and severe sensory disturbance), severe aphasia that made it impossible to follow verbal instructions, and dementia that interfered with outcome assessments. Each subjects sat on the chair with hip joint angles to approximately 90° of flexion, and with knee joint angles to 0° of extension. WBV was applied at 30 Hz (4-8 mm amplitude) for 5 min on hamstrings, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles (Figure 1). The parameters measured before and after the intervention were the MAS, the F-wave parameters as a measure of motor-neuron excitability, the active and passive range of motion (A-ROM, P-ROM) as a measure of motor function, and the 10-m walk test as a measure of walking ability. Results: None of the subjects experienced discomfort before, during or after the intervention and all assessments were completed safely in all subjects. The MAS and F-wave parameters were significantly decreased (p < 0.05), the A-ROM and P-ROM for ankle dorsiflexion increased (p < 0.01), and the P-ROM for straight leg raising increased (p < 0.01), and walking speed improved (p < 0.01) after the 5-min intervention. Conclusion: These findings suggest that WBV is an effective method for controlling spasticity, and improves motor function and walking ability in post-stroke patients.