1.Evaluation of a Seton Procedure Combined With Infliximab Therapy (Early vs. Late) in Perianal Fistula With Crohn Disease
Myunghoon JEON ; Kihwan SONG ; Jail KOO ; Sohyun KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2019;35(5):249-253
PURPOSE: We assessed the clinical outcomes of a seton procedure combined with early versus late institution of infliximab (IFX) therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 76 patients who underwent surgery for perianal fistula associated with Crohn disease between January 2014 and November 2017. All patients underwent loose seton drainage combined with IFX therapy. Patients categorized as the early group (EG, 49 patients) received IFX therapy within 30 days of completion of the seton procedure. Patients categorized as the late group (LG, 27 patients) received IFX therapy >30 days after the seton procedure. IFX therapy was administered as induction and maintenance therapy. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in clinical characteristics of the patients. The mean follow-up was 21.0 ± 11.6 months in the EG and 34.5 ± 18.4 months in the LG (P = 0.001). The mean interval between seton procedure and IFX induction therapy was 12.2 days in the EG and 250.2 days in the LG (P = 0.002). Complete remission was observed in 32 patients (65.3%) in the EG and 17 patients (63.0%) in the LG (P = 0.844). Fistula recurrence was observed in 6 patients (7.9%). All recurrences occurred in a previous perianal fistula tract. CONCLUSION: Patients showed a good response to a seton procedure combined with IFX therapy regardless of the time of initiation of IFX therapy.
Crohn Disease
;
Drainage
;
Fistula
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Infliximab
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies
2.CT Coronary Angiography Using Multidetector Computed Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease : A Comparative Study to Quantitative Coronary Angiography.
Hee Jung OH ; Kihwan KWON ; Si Hoon PARK ; Seong Hoon PARK ; You Hyun LEE ; Min A YU ; Su Hyun KIM ; Jihyun SONG ; Yoon Jung KIM
Korean Circulation Journal 2004;34(12):1167-1173
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary stenoses in patients with ischemic heart disease using multidetector CT coronary angiography (MDCT) in the assessment of coronary artery disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients (49-72yrs) undergoing conventional coronary angiography (CCA) were included in this study. All patients were premedicated with oral propranolol, 40-80 mg, to achieve an acceptable heart rate of less than 65 bpm, 1hr before the MDCT. All coronary arteries, including the distal segments and side branches, were assessed with respect to assessability and the presence of significant stenosis (>50%) and the results compared with those of CCA. RESULTS: Of the 645 coronary artery segments scanned, 540 were assessable (84%). A total 44 significant stenoses were detected by CCA and 49 lesions by MDCT. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 77 and 97%, respectively. The overall accuracy for the LAD, RCA and LCX was 94, 98 and 95%, respectively, and there were no differences in the accuracies in each vessel. The sensitivity in the proximal segments was much higher than in the distal segments. A total 15 segments were overestimated by the MDCT due to calcification and the small vessel size. CONCLUSION: MDCT, with improved spatial and temporal resolutions, and pre-treated with oral beta-blocker, permits the detection of coronary artery stenoses with a high degree of accuracy.
Constriction, Pathologic
;
Coronary Angiography*
;
Coronary Artery Disease*
;
Coronary Stenosis
;
Coronary Vessels*
;
Heart Rate
;
Humans
;
Multidetector Computed Tomography*
;
Myocardial Ischemia
;
Propranolol
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
3.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for the Management of Brain Tumor Patients During the Crisis Period: A Consensus Survey About Specific Clinical Scenarios (Version 2023.1)
Min-Sung KIM ; Se-Il GO ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Seok-Gu KANG ; Kyeong-O GO ; Sae Min KWON ; Woohyun KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Sung-Hye PARK ; Youngbeom SEO ; Sang Woo SONG ; Stephen AHN ; Hyuk-Jin OH ; Hong In YOON ; Sea-Won LEE ; Joo Ho LEE ; Kyung Rae CHO ; Jung Won CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Do Hoon LIM ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2023;11(2):133-139
Background:
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was a shortage of medical resources and the need for proper treatment guidelines for brain tumor patients became more pressing. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has undertaken efforts to develop a guideline that is tailored to the domestic situation and that can be used in similar crisis situations in the future. As part II of the guideline, this consensus survey is to suggest management options in specific clinical scenarios during the crisis period.
Methods:
The KSNO Guideline Working Group consisted of 22 multidisciplinary experts on neuro-oncology in Korea. In order to confirm a consensus reached by the experts, opinions on 5 specific clinical scenarios about the management of brain tumor patients during the crisis period were devised and asked. To build-up the consensus process, Delphi method was employed.
Results:
The summary of the final consensus from each scenario are as follows. For patients with newly diagnosed astrocytoma with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant and oligodendroglioma with IDH-mutant/1p19q codeleted, observation was preferred for patients with low-risk, World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2, and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ≥60, while adjuvant radiotherapy alone was preferred for patients with high-risk, WHO grade 2, and KPS ≥60. For newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma, the most preferred adjuvant treatment strategy after surgery was radiotherapy plus temozolomide except for patients aged ≥70 years with KPS of 60 and unmethylated MGMT promoters. In patients with symptomatic brain metastasis, the preferred treatment differed according to the number of brain metastasis and performance status. For patients with newly diagnosed atypical meningioma, adjuvant radiation was deferred in patients with older age, poor performance status, complete resection, or low mitotic count.
Conclusion
It is imperative that proper medical care for brain tumor patients be sustained and provided, even during the crisis period. The findings of this consensus survey will be a useful reference in determining appropriate treatment options for brain tumor patients in the specific clinical scenarios covered by the survey during the future crisis.
4.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for the Management of Brain Tumor Patients During the Crisis Period: A Consensus Recommendation Using the Delphi Method (Version 2023.1)
Min-Sung KIM ; Se-Il GO ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Seok-Gu KANG ; Kyeong-O GO ; Sae Min KWON ; Woohyun KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Sung-Hye PARK ; Youngbeom SEO ; Sang Woo SONG ; Stephen AHN ; Hyuk-Jin OH ; Hong In YOON ; Sea-Won LEE ; Joo Ho LEE ; Kyung Rae CHO ; Jung Won CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Do Hoon LIM ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2023;11(2):123-132
Background:
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the need for appropriate treatment guidelines for patients with brain tumors was indispensable due to the lack and limitations of medical resources. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has undertaken efforts to develop a guideline that is tailored to the domestic situation and that can be used in similar crisis situations in the future.
Methods:
The KSNO Guideline Working Group was composed of 22 multidisciplinary experts on neuro-oncology in Korea. In order to reach consensus among the experts, the Delphi method was used to build up the final recommendations.
Results:
All participating experts completed the series of surveys, and the results of final survey were used to draft the current consensus recommendations. Priority levels of surgery and radiotherapy during crises were proposed using appropriate time window-based criteria for management outcome. The highest priority for surgery is assigned to patients who are life-threatening or have a risk of significant impact on a patient’s prognosis unless immediate intervention is given within 24–48 hours. As for the radiotherapy, patients who are at risk of compromising their overall survival or neurological status within 4–6 weeks are assigned to the highest priority. Curative-intent chemotherapy has the highest priority, followed by neoadjuvant/adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy during a crisis period. Telemedicine should be actively considered as a management tool for brain tumor patients during the mass infection crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusion
It is crucial that adequate medical care for patients with brain tumors is maintained and provided, even during times of crisis. This guideline will serve as a valuable resource, assisting in the delivery of treatment to brain tumor patients in the event of any future crisis.
5.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Antiepileptic Drug Usage of Brain Tumor: Version 2021.1
Jangsup MOON ; Min-Sung KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Jung Ho IM ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):9-15
Background:
To date, there has been no practical guidelines for the prescription of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in brain tumor patients in Korea. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for AED usage in brain tumors since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of the keywords.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. Prophylactic AED administration is not recommended in newly diagnosed brain tumor patients without previous seizure history. When AEDs are administered during peri/postoperative period, it may be tapered off according to the following recommendations. In seizure-naïve patients with no postoperative seizure, it is recommended to stop or reduce AED 1 week after surgery. In seizure-naïve patients with one early postoperative seizure (<1 week after surgery), it is advisable to maintain AED for at least 3 months before tapering. In seizure-naïve patients with ≥2 postoperative seizures or in patients with preoperative seizure history, it is recommended to maintain AEDs for more than 1 year. The possibility of drug interactions should be considered when selecting AEDs in brain tumor patients. Driving can be allowed in brain tumor patients when proven to be seizure-free for more than 1 year.
Conclusion
The KSNO suggests prescribing AEDs in patients with brain tumor based on the current guideline. This guideline will contribute to spreading evidence-based prescription of AEDs in brain tumor patients in Korea.
6.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Adult Diffuse Midline Glioma: Version 2021.1
Hong In YOON ; Chan Woo WEE ; Young Zoon KIM ; Youngbeom SEO ; Jung Ho IM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Je Beom HONG ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Seo Hee CHOI ; Min-Sung KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):1-8
Background:
There have been no guidelines for the management of adult patients with diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27M-mutant in Korea since the 2016 revised WHO classification newly defined this disease entity. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for DMG since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. As ‘diffuse midline glioma’ was recently defined, and there was no international guideline, trials and guidelines of ‘diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma’ or ‘brain stem glioma’ were thoroughly reviewed first.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. The DMG can be diagnosed when all of the following three criteria are satisfied: the presence of the H3K27M mutation, midline location, and infiltrating feature. Without identification of H3K27M mutation by diagnostic biopsy, DMG cannot be diagnosed. For the primary treatment, maximal safe resection should be considered for tumors when feasible. Radiotherapy is the primary option for tumors in case the total resection is not possible. A total dose of 54 Gy to 60 Gy with conventional fractionation prescribed at 1-2 cm plus gross tumor volume is recommended. Although no chemotherapy has proven to be effective in DMG, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (± maintenance chemotherapy) with temozolomide following WHO grade IV glioblastoma’s protocol is recommended.
Conclusion
The detection of H3K27M mutation is the most important diagnostic criteria for DMG. Combination of surgery (if amenable to surgery), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy based on comprehensive multidisciplinary discussion can be considered as the treatment options for DMG.
7.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Antiepileptic Drug Usage of Brain Tumor: Version 2021.1
Jangsup MOON ; Min-Sung KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Jung Ho IM ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):9-15
Background:
To date, there has been no practical guidelines for the prescription of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in brain tumor patients in Korea. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for AED usage in brain tumors since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of the keywords.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. Prophylactic AED administration is not recommended in newly diagnosed brain tumor patients without previous seizure history. When AEDs are administered during peri/postoperative period, it may be tapered off according to the following recommendations. In seizure-naïve patients with no postoperative seizure, it is recommended to stop or reduce AED 1 week after surgery. In seizure-naïve patients with one early postoperative seizure (<1 week after surgery), it is advisable to maintain AED for at least 3 months before tapering. In seizure-naïve patients with ≥2 postoperative seizures or in patients with preoperative seizure history, it is recommended to maintain AEDs for more than 1 year. The possibility of drug interactions should be considered when selecting AEDs in brain tumor patients. Driving can be allowed in brain tumor patients when proven to be seizure-free for more than 1 year.
Conclusion
The KSNO suggests prescribing AEDs in patients with brain tumor based on the current guideline. This guideline will contribute to spreading evidence-based prescription of AEDs in brain tumor patients in Korea.
8.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Adult Diffuse Midline Glioma: Version 2021.1
Hong In YOON ; Chan Woo WEE ; Young Zoon KIM ; Youngbeom SEO ; Jung Ho IM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Je Beom HONG ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Seo Hee CHOI ; Min-Sung KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):1-8
Background:
There have been no guidelines for the management of adult patients with diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27M-mutant in Korea since the 2016 revised WHO classification newly defined this disease entity. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for DMG since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. As ‘diffuse midline glioma’ was recently defined, and there was no international guideline, trials and guidelines of ‘diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma’ or ‘brain stem glioma’ were thoroughly reviewed first.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. The DMG can be diagnosed when all of the following three criteria are satisfied: the presence of the H3K27M mutation, midline location, and infiltrating feature. Without identification of H3K27M mutation by diagnostic biopsy, DMG cannot be diagnosed. For the primary treatment, maximal safe resection should be considered for tumors when feasible. Radiotherapy is the primary option for tumors in case the total resection is not possible. A total dose of 54 Gy to 60 Gy with conventional fractionation prescribed at 1-2 cm plus gross tumor volume is recommended. Although no chemotherapy has proven to be effective in DMG, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (± maintenance chemotherapy) with temozolomide following WHO grade IV glioblastoma’s protocol is recommended.
Conclusion
The detection of H3K27M mutation is the most important diagnostic criteria for DMG. Combination of surgery (if amenable to surgery), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy based on comprehensive multidisciplinary discussion can be considered as the treatment options for DMG.
9.A National Consensus Survey for Current Practicein Brain Tumor Management III: Brain Metastasis andPrimary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Sung Kwon KIM ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Jangsup MOON ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Do Hoon LIM ; Jung Ho IM ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2020;8(1):20-28
Background:
: The Guideline Working Group of the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO)conducted the nationwide questionnaire survey for diverse queries facing to treat patients with braintumor. As part III of the survey, the aim of this study is to evaluate the national patterns of clinical practicefor patients with brain metastasis and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).
Methods:
: A web-based survey was sent to all members of the KSNO by email. The survey included7 questions of brain metastasis and 5 questions of PCNSL, focused on the management strategiesin specific situations. All questions were developed by consensus of the Guideline WorkingGroup.
Results:
" In the survey about brain metastasis, respondents preferred surgical resection withadjuvant treatment for patients with a surgically accessible single brain metastatic lesion less than 3cm in size without extracranial systemic lesions. However, most respondents considered radiosurgeryfor surgically inaccessible lesions. As the preferred treatment of multiple brain metastases according tothe number of brain lesions, respondents tended to choose radiotherapy with increasing number of lesions.Radiosurgery was mostly chosen for the brain metastases of less than or equal to 4. In the surveyabout PCNSL, a half of respondents choose high-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy asthe first-line induction therapy for PCNSL. The consolidation and salvage therapy showed a little variationamong respondents. For PCNSL patients with cerebrospinal fluid dissemination, intrathecal chemotherapywas most preferred.
Conclusion
: The survey demonstrates the prevailing clinical practice patterns for patients withbrain metastasis and PCNSL among members of the KSNO. This information provides a point of referencefor establishing a practical guideline in the management of brain metastasis and PCNSL.
10.A National Consensus Survey for Current Practicein Brain Tumor Management I: Antiepileptic Drug andSteroid Usage
Sung Kwon KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Jin Mo CHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Ji Eun PARK ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Hong In YOON ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Do Hoon LIM ; Jung Ho IM ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2020;8(1):1-10
Background:
: The Guideline Working Group of the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO)conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey for diverse queries faced in the treatment of brain tumors.As part I of the survey, the aim of this study is to evaluate national patterns of clinical practiceabout antiepileptic drug (AED) and steroid usage for management of brain tumors.
Methods:
: A web-based survey was sent to all members of the KSNO by email. The survey included9 questions of AED usage and 5 questions of steroid usage for brain tumor patients. All questionswere developed by consensus of the Guideline Working Group.
Results:
: The overall response rate was 12.8% (54/423). Regarding AED usage, the majority ofrespondents (95.2%) routinely prescribed prophylactic AEDs for patients with seizure at the peri/postoperativeperiod. However, as many as 72.8% of respondents prescribed AED routinely for seizure-naïvepatients, and others prescribed AED as the case may be. The duration of AED prophylaxis showedwide variance according to the epilepsy status and the location of tumor. Levetiracetam (82.9%) wasthe most preferred AED for epilepsy prophylaxis. Regarding steroid usage, 90.5% of respondents usesteroids in perioperative period, including 34.2% of them as a routine manner. Presence of peritumoraledema (90.9%) was considered as the most important factor determining steroid usage followed bydegree of clinical symptoms (60.6%). More than half of respondents (51.2%) replied to discontinue thesteroids within a week after surgery if there are no specific medical conditions, while 7.3% preferredslow tapering up to a month after surgery.
Conclusion
: The survey demonstrated the prevailing practice patterns on AED and steroid usagein neuro-oncologic field among members of the KSNO. This information provides a point of referencefor establishing a practical guideline in the management of brain tumor patients.