1.Aerodynamic Analysis of Voice in Patients with Thyroidectomy.
Yujeong SHIN ; Kihwan HONG ; Yongtae HONG ; Jungseuk OH ; Yunsub YOON ; Hyundoo LEE
Journal of Korean Thyroid Association 2014;7(1):77-82
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study is to prospectively compare and analyze the aerodynamic changes in the patients with thyroid cancer before and after surgery. Changes in vocal function before and after thyroidectomy were examined using aerodynamic and related assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty one patients were evaluated preoperatively, 5-7 days and 6-7 weeks postoperatively to assess aerodynamic outcomes after thyroidectomy. Glottal input power (GIP), glottal efficiency (GE) and maximum phonation time (MPT), were determined the time of before surgery, 5-7 days after surgery and 6-7 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: According to the comparison analysis of the three periods, GIP with /pi/ phonation was significantly reduced at time of 5-7 days and 6-7 weeks after surgery, but not in the /p(h)i /and /p'i/ phonations. GE was significantly reduced in the /pi/, /p(h)i/ and /p'i/ phonations at time of 5-7 days and 6-7 weeks after surgery. MPT was significantly reduced at time of 5-7 days after surgery significantly. CONCLUSION: Aerodynamic assessment showed systematic changes in vocal function associated with thyroidectomy. These results should be useful data for vocal management in individuals who have had thyroidectomy and for assessment of voice disorders in clinical settings.
Humans
;
Phonation
;
Prospective Studies
;
Thyroid Neoplasms
;
Thyroidectomy*
;
Voice Disorders
;
Voice*
2.Hematuria in Renal Transplant Patients: Causes and Diagnostic Algorithm.
Jong Hoon LEE ; Soon Il KIM ; Yu Seun KIM ; Kihwan KWON ; Kiil PARK ; Koon Ho RHA ; Seung Choul YANG ; Soon Won HONG ; Hyeon Joo JEONG ; Hyun Jung KIM ; Kyungock JEON
The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation 2002;16(1):57-61
PURPOSE: Hematuria is a frequently encountered clinical problem in kidney graft recipients. The causes are variable, may be benign or malignant, but imperative to affect long- term graft function and survival. We have evaluated renal recipients who had hematuria using a newly defined algorithm. METHODS: We evaluated 1060 renal transplant recipients from March 1, 1992 to February 28, 2000. In 93 recipients, hematuria was transitory and spontaneously resolved within 3 months. We tried to identify the cause of persistent hematuria in 126 recipients. Patients were evaluated with plain x-ray, sonography, cystoscopic examination and/or graft biopsy. RESULTS: The mean duration of hematuria onset after transplantation was 17.81+/-14.6 months (4-70 months). The causes of gross hematuria were urolithiasis (n= 15), benign bladder mucosal bleeding (n=3), bladder cancer (n=2) and kidney cancer from an original kidney (n=1). Graft kidney biopsies were performed in 96 patients and the results were as follows: chronic rejection in 18, IgA nephropathy in 16, cyclosporine toxicity in 8, acute rejection in 5, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in 3, the other glomerulonephritis in 2, and tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis in 19 patients. Combined pathologic findings were detected in 15 patients. In 8 patients, no pathological diagnoses were made. We were unable to evaluate 9 patients due to patient's refusal. CONCLUSION: The causes of hematuria after kidney transplantation are variable from benign to malignant disease. If the cause of hematuria is uncertain on ultrasonographic examination, cystoscopic examination and/or graft biopsy should be performed for making a definite diagnosis.
Atrophy
;
Biopsy
;
Cyclosporine
;
Diagnosis
;
Disulfiram
;
Fibrosis
;
Glomerulonephritis
;
Glomerulonephritis, IGA
;
Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental
;
Hematuria*
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Kidney
;
Kidney Neoplasms
;
Kidney Transplantation
;
Transplantation
;
Transplants
;
Urinary Bladder
;
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
;
Urolithiasis
3.The Analysis of Induction Chemotherapy Using Docetaxel and Platinum in Treatment of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Jongseung KIM ; Kyengsuk LEE ; Byungeon HWANG ; Sangho LIM ; Sunho RYU ; Ilwoo HA ; Eun Jung LEE ; Kihwan HONG ; Yunsu YANG
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2010;53(11):706-711
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel and platinum in patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The medical records of 66 patients who were diagnosed with hypopharyngeal carcinoma at our department from January 1996 to December 2008 were reviewed and retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into four groups according to treatment method: Group I was treated with radiation and induction chemotherapy consist of docetaxel and platinum (27); Group II was treated with surgery and induction chemotherapy consist of docetaxel and platinum (28), Group III was treated with radiation and induction chemotherapy consist of 5-FU and platinum (9) and Group IV was treated with surgery and induction chemotherapy consist of 5-FU and platinum (2). A total of 186 chemotherapy cycles were administered to patients and most of the patients received at least 2 cycles. RESULTS: The T-stage distribution at diagnosis was 7.5%, 42.4%, 28.8%, and 21.2% for T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. The N-stage distribution at diagnosis was 48.5%, 22.7%, 10.6%, 15.2%, and 9.1% for N0, N1, N2a, N2b, and N2c, respectively. The overall 3-year survival rate was 44.3%. The 3-year survival rate of each group was 42.6% in Group I, 54.8% in Group II, and 11.1% in Group III. There was no significant difference in survival between Groups I and III (p=0.074). There was no difference in sex, age, and N stage for 3-year survival rate. CONCLUSION: Although any valid conclusions could not be drawn because of the small number of patients examined here, induction chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel and platinum may improve the outcome of patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Fluorouracil
;
Humans
;
Induction Chemotherapy
;
Medical Records
;
Platinum
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Survival Rate
;
Taxoids
;
Treatment Outcome
4.Expression of osteopontin in calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaques.
Hyuck Moon KWON ; Bum Kee HONG ; Tae Soo KANG ; Kihwan KWON ; Hae Kyoon KIM ; Yangsoo JANG ; Donghoon CHOI ; Hyun Young PARK ; Soek Min KANG ; Seung Yun CHO ; Hyun Seung KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2000;15(5):485-493
Advanced atherosclerosis is often associated with dystrophic calcification and remodeling of extracellular matrix of vascular wall. Recently many studies have documented a general relationship between calcification and severity of coronary disease, and discussed the feasibility of electron beam computed tomography for detecting and quantifying the coronary artery calcification in the patients. The present study investigated the expression and the localization of osteopontin, one of noncollagenous bone matrix protein, within the calcified coronary arteries. Autopsy-derived coronary artery specimens were scanned and reconstructed to visualize the pattern of coronary calcification using a novel microscopic computed tomography technique. The localization of the osteopontin were evaluated by immunohistochemial stain with LF7. The present study showed that the pattern of coronary calcification is variable and the expression of osteopontin is localized mainly to calcified lesion. The smooth muscle cells in addition to macrophage expressed osteopontin protein in human coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Soluble osteopontin released near to the sites of vascular calcification may represent an adaptive mechanism aimed at regulating the process of vascular calcification.
Aged
;
Calcinosis/metabolism
;
Coronary Arteriosclerosis/pathology*
;
Coronary Arteriosclerosis/metabolism*
;
Coronary Vessels/pathology*
;
Coronary Vessels/metabolism
;
Coronary Vessels/chemistry*
;
Female
;
Human
;
Immunohistochemistry
;
Male
;
Middle Age
;
Sialoglycoproteins/biosynthesis
;
Sialoglycoproteins/analysis*
5.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for the Management of Brain Tumor Patients During the Crisis Period: A Consensus Survey About Specific Clinical Scenarios (Version 2023.1)
Min-Sung KIM ; Se-Il GO ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Seok-Gu KANG ; Kyeong-O GO ; Sae Min KWON ; Woohyun KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Sung-Hye PARK ; Youngbeom SEO ; Sang Woo SONG ; Stephen AHN ; Hyuk-Jin OH ; Hong In YOON ; Sea-Won LEE ; Joo Ho LEE ; Kyung Rae CHO ; Jung Won CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Do Hoon LIM ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2023;11(2):133-139
Background:
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was a shortage of medical resources and the need for proper treatment guidelines for brain tumor patients became more pressing. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has undertaken efforts to develop a guideline that is tailored to the domestic situation and that can be used in similar crisis situations in the future. As part II of the guideline, this consensus survey is to suggest management options in specific clinical scenarios during the crisis period.
Methods:
The KSNO Guideline Working Group consisted of 22 multidisciplinary experts on neuro-oncology in Korea. In order to confirm a consensus reached by the experts, opinions on 5 specific clinical scenarios about the management of brain tumor patients during the crisis period were devised and asked. To build-up the consensus process, Delphi method was employed.
Results:
The summary of the final consensus from each scenario are as follows. For patients with newly diagnosed astrocytoma with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant and oligodendroglioma with IDH-mutant/1p19q codeleted, observation was preferred for patients with low-risk, World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2, and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ≥60, while adjuvant radiotherapy alone was preferred for patients with high-risk, WHO grade 2, and KPS ≥60. For newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma, the most preferred adjuvant treatment strategy after surgery was radiotherapy plus temozolomide except for patients aged ≥70 years with KPS of 60 and unmethylated MGMT promoters. In patients with symptomatic brain metastasis, the preferred treatment differed according to the number of brain metastasis and performance status. For patients with newly diagnosed atypical meningioma, adjuvant radiation was deferred in patients with older age, poor performance status, complete resection, or low mitotic count.
Conclusion
It is imperative that proper medical care for brain tumor patients be sustained and provided, even during the crisis period. The findings of this consensus survey will be a useful reference in determining appropriate treatment options for brain tumor patients in the specific clinical scenarios covered by the survey during the future crisis.
6.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for the Management of Brain Tumor Patients During the Crisis Period: A Consensus Recommendation Using the Delphi Method (Version 2023.1)
Min-Sung KIM ; Se-Il GO ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Seok-Gu KANG ; Kyeong-O GO ; Sae Min KWON ; Woohyun KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Sung-Hye PARK ; Youngbeom SEO ; Sang Woo SONG ; Stephen AHN ; Hyuk-Jin OH ; Hong In YOON ; Sea-Won LEE ; Joo Ho LEE ; Kyung Rae CHO ; Jung Won CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Do Hoon LIM ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2023;11(2):123-132
Background:
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the need for appropriate treatment guidelines for patients with brain tumors was indispensable due to the lack and limitations of medical resources. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has undertaken efforts to develop a guideline that is tailored to the domestic situation and that can be used in similar crisis situations in the future.
Methods:
The KSNO Guideline Working Group was composed of 22 multidisciplinary experts on neuro-oncology in Korea. In order to reach consensus among the experts, the Delphi method was used to build up the final recommendations.
Results:
All participating experts completed the series of surveys, and the results of final survey were used to draft the current consensus recommendations. Priority levels of surgery and radiotherapy during crises were proposed using appropriate time window-based criteria for management outcome. The highest priority for surgery is assigned to patients who are life-threatening or have a risk of significant impact on a patient’s prognosis unless immediate intervention is given within 24–48 hours. As for the radiotherapy, patients who are at risk of compromising their overall survival or neurological status within 4–6 weeks are assigned to the highest priority. Curative-intent chemotherapy has the highest priority, followed by neoadjuvant/adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy during a crisis period. Telemedicine should be actively considered as a management tool for brain tumor patients during the mass infection crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusion
It is crucial that adequate medical care for patients with brain tumors is maintained and provided, even during times of crisis. This guideline will serve as a valuable resource, assisting in the delivery of treatment to brain tumor patients in the event of any future crisis.
7.Influence of Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Grade III Gliomas: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial (KNOG-1101 Study)
Grace S. AHN ; Kihwan HWANG ; Tae Min KIM ; Chul Kee PARK ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Tae-Young JUNG ; Jin Hee KIM ; Do-Hyun NAM ; Se-Hyuk KIM ; Heon YOO ; Yong-Kil HONG ; Eun-Young KIM ; Dong-Eun LEE ; Jungnam JOO ; Yu Jung KIM ; Gheeyoung CHOE ; Byung Se CHOI ; Seok-Gu KANG ; Jeong Hoon KIM ; Chae-Yong KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2022;54(2):396-405
Purpose:
The KNOG-1101 study showed improved 2-year PFS with temozolomide during and after radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone for patients with anaplastic gliomas. This trial investigates the effect of concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Materials and Methods:
In this randomized, open-label, phase II trial, 90 patients with World Health Organization grade III glioma were enrolled across multiple centers in South Korea between March 2012 to February 2015 and followed up through 2017. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and 20-item EORTC QLQ-Brain Neoplasm (QLQ-BN20) were used to compare HRQoL between patients assigned to concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (arm A) and radiotherapy (RT) alone (arm B).
Results:
Of the 90 patients in the study, 84 patients (93.3%) completed the baseline HRQoL questionnaire. Emotional functioning, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, constipation, appetite loss, diarrhea, seizures, itchy skin, drowsiness, hair loss, and bladder control were not affected by the addition of temozolomide. All other items did not differ significantly between arm A and arm B throughout treatment. Global health status particularly stayed consistent at the end of adjuvant temozolomide (p=0.47) and at the end of RT (p=0.33).
Conclusion
The addition of concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide did not show negative influence on HRQoL with improvement of progression-free survival for patients with anaplastic gliomas. The absence of systematic and clinically relevant changes in HRQoL suggests that an overall long-term net clinical benefit exists for concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide.
8.Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Grade IIIGliomas without 1p/19q Co-deletion: A Randomized, Open-Label,Phase 2 Study (KNOG-1101 Study)
Kihwan HWANG ; Tae Min KIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Tae-Young JUNG ; Jin Hee KIM ; Do-Hyun NAM ; Se-Hyuk KIM ; Heon YOO ; Yong-Kil HONG ; Eun-Young KIM ; Dong-Eun LEE ; Jungnam JOO ; Yu Jung KIM ; Gheeyoung CHOE ; Byung Se CHOI ; Seok-Gu KANG ; Jeong Hoon KIM ; Chae-Yong KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2020;52(2):505-515
Purpose:
We investigated the efficacy of temozolomide during and after radiotherapy in Korean adultswith anaplastic gliomas without 1p/19q co-deletion.
Materials and Methods:
This was a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study and notably the first multicenter trial forKorean grade III glioma patients. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and hadnewly diagnosed non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma with an Eastern Cooperative OncologyGroup performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive radiotherapyalone (60 Gy in 30 fractions of 2 Gy) (control group, n=44) or to receive radiotherapy withconcurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day) followed by adjuvant temozolomide (150-200mg/m2/day for 5 days during six 28-day cycles) (treatment group, n=40). The primary endpointwas 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Seventy patients (83.3%) were availablefor the analysis of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 gene (IDH1) mutation status.
Results:
The two-year PFS was 42.2% in the treatment group and 37.2% in the control group. Overallsurvival (OS) did not reach to significant difference between the groups. In multivariableanalysis, age was a significant risk factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; 95% confidenceinterval [CI], 1.04 to 4.16). The IDH1mutation was the only significant prognostic factor forPFS (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.59) and OS (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.50). Adverseevents over grade 3 were seen in 16 patients (40.0%) in the treatment group and werereversible.
Conclusion
Concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in Korean adults with newly diagnosed nonco-deleted anaplastic gliomas showed improved 2-year PFS. The survival benefit of this regimenneeds further analysis with long-term follow-up at least more than 10 years.
9.A National Consensus Survey for Current Practicein Brain Tumor Management III: Brain Metastasis andPrimary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Sung Kwon KIM ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Jangsup MOON ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Do Hoon LIM ; Jung Ho IM ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2020;8(1):20-28
Background:
: The Guideline Working Group of the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO)conducted the nationwide questionnaire survey for diverse queries facing to treat patients with braintumor. As part III of the survey, the aim of this study is to evaluate the national patterns of clinical practicefor patients with brain metastasis and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).
Methods:
: A web-based survey was sent to all members of the KSNO by email. The survey included7 questions of brain metastasis and 5 questions of PCNSL, focused on the management strategiesin specific situations. All questions were developed by consensus of the Guideline WorkingGroup.
Results:
" In the survey about brain metastasis, respondents preferred surgical resection withadjuvant treatment for patients with a surgically accessible single brain metastatic lesion less than 3cm in size without extracranial systemic lesions. However, most respondents considered radiosurgeryfor surgically inaccessible lesions. As the preferred treatment of multiple brain metastases according tothe number of brain lesions, respondents tended to choose radiotherapy with increasing number of lesions.Radiosurgery was mostly chosen for the brain metastases of less than or equal to 4. In the surveyabout PCNSL, a half of respondents choose high-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy asthe first-line induction therapy for PCNSL. The consolidation and salvage therapy showed a little variationamong respondents. For PCNSL patients with cerebrospinal fluid dissemination, intrathecal chemotherapywas most preferred.
Conclusion
: The survey demonstrates the prevailing clinical practice patterns for patients withbrain metastasis and PCNSL among members of the KSNO. This information provides a point of referencefor establishing a practical guideline in the management of brain metastasis and PCNSL.
10.A National Consensus Survey for Current Practicein Brain Tumor Management I: Antiepileptic Drug andSteroid Usage
Sung Kwon KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Jin Mo CHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Ji Eun PARK ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Hong In YOON ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Do Hoon LIM ; Jung Ho IM ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2020;8(1):1-10
Background:
: The Guideline Working Group of the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO)conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey for diverse queries faced in the treatment of brain tumors.As part I of the survey, the aim of this study is to evaluate national patterns of clinical practiceabout antiepileptic drug (AED) and steroid usage for management of brain tumors.
Methods:
: A web-based survey was sent to all members of the KSNO by email. The survey included9 questions of AED usage and 5 questions of steroid usage for brain tumor patients. All questionswere developed by consensus of the Guideline Working Group.
Results:
: The overall response rate was 12.8% (54/423). Regarding AED usage, the majority ofrespondents (95.2%) routinely prescribed prophylactic AEDs for patients with seizure at the peri/postoperativeperiod. However, as many as 72.8% of respondents prescribed AED routinely for seizure-naïvepatients, and others prescribed AED as the case may be. The duration of AED prophylaxis showedwide variance according to the epilepsy status and the location of tumor. Levetiracetam (82.9%) wasthe most preferred AED for epilepsy prophylaxis. Regarding steroid usage, 90.5% of respondents usesteroids in perioperative period, including 34.2% of them as a routine manner. Presence of peritumoraledema (90.9%) was considered as the most important factor determining steroid usage followed bydegree of clinical symptoms (60.6%). More than half of respondents (51.2%) replied to discontinue thesteroids within a week after surgery if there are no specific medical conditions, while 7.3% preferredslow tapering up to a month after surgery.
Conclusion
: The survey demonstrated the prevailing practice patterns on AED and steroid usagein neuro-oncologic field among members of the KSNO. This information provides a point of referencefor establishing a practical guideline in the management of brain tumor patients.