No abstract available.
Humans ; Ulsan*

BACKGROUND: The fire victims are affected not only by bum and trauma but also carbon monoxide(CO) and hypoxia. It may be useful to triage mass casualties of fire field that preestimate the victim's injury sevrrities by experiments of measuring the concentration of CO and oxygen according to time progression. METHOD: We prepared one house of apartment as like usual residental environment. The mesuring of concentrations of CO and oxygen was started from firing. RESULT: 3.8 Min. after firing: CO concentration(0.007%) was reached to the level that can give rise to spontaneous headache. 5 Min.: The concentration of CO was incerased. At this level(0.012%), the victims of fire may be suffered severe headache inspite of mild movement. 5.5 Min.: At this time,0.02% of CO concentration that the victims can't escape by themselves was checked. 6 Min.; 0.08% was measured, almost patients may be unconscious and the symptoms will be more severe at this CO concentration because of hypoxia.6.4 Min.: It was absolutly impossible to be survival at this time due to incresing of CO concentration(0.195%) and decreasing of O2 concentration(5%). CONCLUSION: It is within 5.5 Min. that the patient can escape by themselves, and impossible to be survival more than 6.5 Min. in fire field. Rescuers and EMTs must consider time factor as well as sysmtoms of patients.
Anoxia ; Carbon* ; Fires* ; Headache ; Humans ; Mass Casualty Incidents ; Oxygen ; Time Factors ; Triage ; United Nations

No abstract available.
Methotrexate* ; Skin*

No abstract available.
Carcinoma, Renal Cell* ; Prostate*

No abstract available.
Carcinoma, Renal Cell* ; Prostate*

BACKGROUND: Although Lightwand and Glidescope have both shown high success rates for intubation, there has been no confirmation as to which device is most effective for difficult endotracheal intubation. We compared the Glidescope and Lightwand devices in terms of duration of intubation and success rate at the first attempt in a simulated difficult airway situation. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were randomized to undergo tracheal intubation with either the Glidescope (Glidescope group, n = 29) or the Lightwand (Lightwand group, n = 29). All patients were fitted with a semi-hard cervical collar in order to simulate a difficult airway, and intubation was attempted with the assigned airway device. The data collected included the rate of successful endotracheal intubation, the number of attempts required, the duration of the intubation, as well as the interincisor distance, hemodynamic variables, and adverse effects. RESULTS: There was no difference between Glidescope group (92.6%) and Lightwand group (96.4%) in terms of success rate for the first attempt at intubation. The duration of successful intubation for the first tracheal intubation attempt was significantly longer in Glidescope group than in Lightwand group (46.9 sec vs 29.5 sec, P = 0.001). All intubations were completed successfully within two intubation attempts. The incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in Glidescope group than in Lightwand group (51.9% vs 17.9%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In a simulated difficult airway situation, endotracheal intubation using Lightwand yielded a shorter duration of intubation and lower incidence of hypertension than when using Glidescope.
Airway Management ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Incidence ; Intubation* ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Laryngoscopes ; Transillumination

No abstract available.
Durapatite* ; Radionuclide Imaging*

No abstract available.
Arteriovenous Malformations* ; Uterus*

No abstract available.
Arteriovenous Malformations* ; Uterus*

No abstract available.
Granuloma, Plasma Cell* ; Urinary Bladder*