2.The Global Landscape of Domestic Violence against Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review
Priya Dharishini KUNASAGRAN ; Khalid MOKTI ; Mohd Yusof IBRAHIM ; Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul RAHIM ; Freddie ROBINSON ; Adora J MUYOU ; Sheila Miriam MUJIN ; Nabihah ALI ; Gary Goh Chun CHAO ; Rudi NASIB ; Abraham Chiu En LOONG ; Nachia Banu Abdul RAHIM ; Mohd Hafizuddin AHMAD ; Prabakaran Solomon DHANARAJ ; Pathman ARUMUGAM ; Jamilah YUSOFF
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2024;45(1):3-11
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to an alarming increase in domestic violence against women owing to lockdown measures and limited access to support services. This article provides insights into the global prevalence of domestic violence, barriers to seeking help, its impact on women and children, and the best practices implemented worldwide. Domestic violence encompasses various forms of abuse; many young women experience partner violence. Barriers to seeking help include fear, financial constraints, lack of awareness of available services, and distrust among stakeholders. The consequences of domestic violence affect the mental health of both mothers and children. Countries have increased shelter funding and developed innovative protocols to reach survivors and address this issue. However, the healthcare sector’s involvement in addressing domestic violence has been limited. This review advocates collaboration among healthcare institutions and government bodies. Key recommendations include utilizing telehealth services, implementing comprehensive training programs, establishing effective referral systems, enhancing health education, developing a domestic violence registry, improving the responses of law enforcement and justice systems through healthcare integration, promoting data sharing, and conducting further research. Healthcare systems should recognize domestic violence as a public health concern and detect, prevent, and intervene in cases to support survivors.
3.Towards Precision Health in Weight Reduction: Thematic Content Analysis of an Open-Ended Survey on Reasons Why Morbidly Obese Patients Want to Lose Weight
Mazapuspavina Md-Yasin ; Ilham Ameera Ismail ; Khasnur Abd Malek ; Khalid Yusoff ; Awang Bulgiba
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2022;18(No.2):33-41
Introduction: Addressing motivation to lose weight among morbidly obese patients increases successful weight management outcomes. We aimed to understand the motivations and reasons why morbidly obese patients attending
hospital-based weight management programmes wanted to lose weight. Methods: A qualitative thematic content
analysis was used to analyse responses from a self-administered open-ended question, “What is the main factor why
you want to lose your weight?”. A total of 225 new patients attending obesity clinics program run by endocrinologists, dietitians and occupational therapists in two tertiary hospitals in Klang Valley responded to the questionnaire.
Results: Patients’ mean BMI was 45.6±8.05 kg/m2
. Four themes emerged and they are health, function, appearance
and perceived stigma. Health, the most commonly inferred theme (84%), highlighted concerns over obesity complications and concomitant morbidities, which include infertility, impact on surgical procedures as well as general
physical and psychological well-being. Patients regard being functional to care for themselves, family members,
religious and career needs as the next most crucial theme (25.8%). They relate to the theme appearance (12.9%) by
wanting to look and feel beautiful. The theme perceived stigmatization recount the time when they were mocked and
laughed at for their appearance (3.1%). Conclusion: Patients with morbid obesity in this study had expressed their
main personal motivational reasons to lose weight. Identifying and addressing these unique personal motivations in
a focused approach is vital for health care professionals to manage the complexity of the health, social and psychological needs among patients with morbid obesity.
4.Association of Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Apolipoproteins with Stroke Subtypes in an International Case Control Study (INTERSTROKE)
Martin J. O’DONNELL ; Matthew MCQUEEN ; Allan SNIDERMAN ; Guillaume PARE ; Xingyu WANG ; Graeme J. HANKEY ; Sumathy RANGARAJAN ; Siu Lim CHIN ; Purnima RAO-MELACINI ; John FERGUSON ; Denis XAVIER ; Liu LISHENG ; Hongye ZHANG ; Prem PAIS ; Patricio LOPEZ-JARAMILLO ; Albertino DAMASCENO ; Peter LANGHORNE ; Annika ROSENGREN ; Antonio L. DANS ; Ahmed ELSAYED ; Alvaro AVEZUM ; Charles MONDO ; Conor JUDGE ; Hans-Christoph DIENER ; Danuta RYGLEWICZ ; Anna CZLONKOWSKA ; Nana POGOSOVA ; Christian WEIMAR ; Romana IQBAL ; Rafael DIAZ ; Khalid YUSOFF ; Afzalhussein YUSUFALI ; Aytekin OGUZ ; Ernesto PENAHERRERA ; Fernando LANAS ; Okechukwu S. OGAH ; Adesola OGUNNIYI ; Helle K. IVERSEN ; German MALAGA ; Zvonko RUMBOLDT ; Shahram OVEISGHARAN ; Fawaz AL HUSSAIN ; Yongchai NILANONT ; Salim YUSUF ;
Journal of Stroke 2022;24(2):224-235
Background:
and Purpose The association of dyslipidemia with stroke has been inconsistent, which may be due to differing associations within etiological stroke subtypes. We sought to determine the association of lipoproteins and apolipoproteins within stroke subtypes.
Methods:
Standardized incident case-control STROKE study in 32 countries. Cases were patients with acute hospitalized first stroke, and matched by age, sex and site to controls. Concentrations of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1), and apoB were measured. Non-HDL-C was calculated. We estimated multivariable odds ratio (OR) and population attributable risk percentage (PAR%). Outcome measures were all stroke, ischemic stroke (and subtypes), and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).
Results:
Our analysis included 11,898 matched case-control pairs; 77.3% with ischemic stroke and 22.7% with ICH. Increasing apoB (OR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.14 per standard deviation [SD]) and LDL-C (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.10 per SD) were associated with an increase in risk of ischemic stroke, but a reduced risk of ICH. Increased apoB was significantly associated with large vessel stroke (PAR 13.4%; 95% CI, 5.6 to 28.4) and stroke of undetermined cause. Higher HDL-C (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.78 per SD) and apoA1 (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.66 per SD) were associated with ischemic stroke (and subtypes). While increasing HDL-C was associated with an increased risk of ICH (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.27 per SD), apoA1 was associated with a reduced risk (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.85 per SD). ApoB/A1 (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.44 per SD) had a stronger magnitude of association than the ratio of LDL-C/HDL-C (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.31 per SD) with ischemic stroke (P<0.0001).
Conclusions
The pattern and magnitude of association of lipoproteins and apolipoproteins with stroke varies by etiological stroke subtype. While the directions of association for LDL, HDL, and apoB were opposing for ischemic stroke and ICH, apoA1 was associated with a reduction in both ischemic stroke and ICH. The ratio of apoB/A1 was the best lipid predictor of ischemic stroke risk.