Objective To establish a model of rat orthotopic liver transplantation and investigate the relationship among cold preservation time, activation of nuclear transcription factor-κB (NF-κB) and donor preservation injury after liver transplantation. Methods Orthotopic liver transplantation was performed in Wistar rats which were randomly divided into the following groups according to the different duration of liver cold storage in UW solution: group A (sham operation, n=10), group B NF-κB in liver before and after transplantation was measured by electrophoretic mobility shift assays; protein expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) in the liver was measured by immunohistochemistry; the serum TNFα and IL-1β, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and hepatic cell apoptosis were examined. Results With extended cold storage duration, the activity of NF-κB in the donor liver increased (P<0.05, group D vs. groups A, B and C). TNF-α and IL-1β levels also increased (P<0.05, group D vs. groups A, B and C). Donor liver reperfusion injury was gradually aggravated with the prolonging of graft cold preservation. Both the serum TNF-α and IL-1β levels increased highly (P<0.05 group A vs. groups B, C and D),NF-κB in the liver significantly increased (P<0.05, group A vs. groups D, B and C) with gradual prolonging of graft cold preservation time. The serum ALT and AST level and apoptosis index level elevated greatly (P<0.05, group A vs. groups D, B and C). Conclusion NF-κB of donor liver was activated inductively in cold preservation phase and activated explosively in reperfusion phase. The longer cold preservation time was, the higher NF-κB level in donor liver became. NF-κB led to the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in donor liver. Inflammatory factors are one of the most important mechanisms for the donor liver injury after liver transplantation.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary tumor resection for asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases.Methods:A literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and WanFang databases to identify studies comparing primary tumor resection and systemic treatment for asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases until March 31, 2021 (inchuding RCTs and non-RCTs) . The search strategy was: (((colorectal cancer) OR (colorectal neoplasms) OR (colon cancer) OR (colon neoplasms) OR (rectal cancer) OR (rectal neoplasms)) AND ((metastatic) OR (stage Ⅳ)) AND (asymptomatic) AND (primary tumor resection)). Review manager (RevMan) (Version 5.3.0, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was used to perform the statistical analysis.Results:A total of 14 original studies (RCT: 1; cohort study: 13) were included in this analysis with a total of 2123 patients (primary tumor resection: 1162 cases, systemic treatment: 961 cases). The results of this Meta-analysis showed that PTR group had a significantly improved overall survival in 1-year overall survival ( HR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.67~0.95, P=0.01), 2-year overall survival ( HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.71~0.93, P=0.002), 3-year overall survival ( HR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.72~0.92, P=0.001), 4-year overall survival ( HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.75~0.98, P=0.02) and 5-year overall survival ( HR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.74~0.97, P=0.02). The median survival time of PTR group was 4.35 months longer than that of systemic treatment group ( MD=4.35, 95% CI: 0.99~7.72, P=0.015). Conclusions:The current evidence suggests that primary tumor resection may be a potentially safe and feasible treatment strategy for asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases. Large sample size prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate our findings in the future.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of two procedures in the treatment of hemorrhoid: the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Methods: A retrospective cohort research was conducted. Clinical data of 263 patients undergoing the first elective surgery for grade IV hemorrhoids by the same team of surgeons at our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively, while those had other anorectal diseases, emergency surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, tumor and incomplete clinical data were excluded. PPH was performed in 129 patients and STARR was performed in 134 patients. PPH procedure: a circular purse 2-0 string suture was made at 4 cm above the dentate line; in accordance with the standard protocol, the PPH circular stapling devicewas introduced; the suture was closed, and a pull-through followed; the traction was continued; the stapler was fired; the prolapsed mucosa and submucosa were removed. STARR procedure: 3-5 needles were sutured in the anterior rectal mucosa, protecting the posterior wall mucosa; with the help of a finger the PPH stapler was inserted into the vaginal lumen; the sutures were hooked from both sides of the stapler to maintain traction; according to the disease condition, the suturewas tightened appropriately; stapler was screwed and activated; the anterior wall mucosa was removed; the joint of the both ends of anastomosis was cut; the posterior wall mucosa was removed as well. The short-term efficacy, surgical safety and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results: There were 67 males (51.9%) in the PPH group and 57 (42.5%) males in the STARR group. The median age of the two groups was 51.0 (22.0, 80.0) years and 49.0 (24.0, 74.0) years, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences in the intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic drug use, postoperative bleeding, postoperative infection, etc. were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to PPH group, STAAR group had longer operation time and higher hospitalization cost with significant differences [(44.0±19.3) minutes vs. (26.3±8.5) minutes, t=9.701, P=0.001; (11 047±473) yuan vs. (7674±309) yuan, t=32.826, P=0.001]. One case in STAAR group developed rectovaginal fistula. The median follow-up period of the whole group was 40 (33, 52) months. A total of 108 cases in STARR group and 114 cases in PPH group completed the follow-up. The 3-year disease-relapse rate was 0 in STARR group and 4.2% in PPH group (P=0.042). Conclusion STARR procedure can improve the prognosis in the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoid, but attention should be paid to the development of complications.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the factors affecting perineal incision complications after abdominperineal excision(APE) for rectal cancer.

METHODSThis was a retrospective study of 167 patients with rectal cancer undergoing APE at Peking University People's Hospital between October 1998 and December 2013. Chi-square test and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to identify risk factors.

RESULTSThe overall rate of perineal incision complication was 24.6%(41/167) including 7 cases of incision infection, 10 cases of incision fat liquefaction, 21 cases of poor wound healing, 2 cases of incision fistula, 1 case of incision dehiscence. In univariate analysis, the risk factors associated with perineal incision complication were operating time≥280 minutes(P=0.005), blood loss≥350 ml(P=0.017) and the protective factors associated with perineal incision complication were the procedure of APE (P=0.048), intraperitoneal chemotherapy with 5-FU sustained release (P=0.014), lymph node metastasis (P=0.006), while gender, age, BMI, ASA score, other complications, distance from distal tumor to anal verge, preoperative radiochemotherapy, postoperative stay in ICU, total drainage volume 3 days before operation, tumor differentiation, and postoperative TNM staging were not associated with perineal incision complication(all P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified two independent risk factors: operating time≥280 minutes(OR=5.217, 95% CI:1.250 - 6.234, P=0.000), intraperitoneal chemotherapy with 5-FU sustained release(OR=3.284, 95% CI:1.156 - 9.334, P=0.026).

CONCLUSIONSOperating time≥280 minutes and intraperitoneal chemotherapy with 5-FU sustained release are independent risk factors for perineal incision complications after APE for rectal cancer. For patients receiving APE procedure, intraperitoneal chemotherapy with 5-FU sustained release should be used with caution, and the operative time should be reduced when possible.

Abdomen ; surgery ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Neoplasm Staging ; Operative Time ; Perineum ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Rectum ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surgical Wound Infection ; epidemiology

Background The incidence rate of missed abortion is increasing year by year, but the etiology has not been fully elucidated. Adverse pregnancy history and exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) may increase the risk of missed abortion. Objective To investigate the interaction between adverse pregnancy history and PAHs exposure on missed abortion in early pregnancy, and to provide evidence for the etiologic research of missed abortion. Methods A total of 114 pregnant women diagnosed with missed abortion in the Department of Obstetrics of the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from March to December 2019 were selected as the case group, and 139 pregnant women who visited the same hospital for voluntary induced abortion in the same period as the control group, to collect basic information and medical information of abortion, stillbirth, intrauterine growth retardation, and other adverse pregnancy history. Abortion villus tissues were collected to detect PAH-DNA adducts levels, stratified by pregnancy and adverse pregnancy history and grouped by quartile method: Q₁ (< 404.61 ng·L⁻¹), Q₂ (404.61−453.75 ng·L⁻¹), Q₃ (453.76−506.72 ng·L⁻¹), and Q₄ (≥506.73 ng·L⁻¹). SPSS 25.0 statistical software was used for χ² test and multiple logistic regression, and additive and multiplicative models were used to investigate the interaction between adverse pregnancy history and PAH-DNA adducts level on missed abortion. The PAH-DNA adducts were grouped by tertiles and quartiles, and P₃₃, P₅₀, P₆₇ and P₇₅ were used as data cut points for sensitivity analysis. Results The proportion of adverse pregnancy history in the case group (32.46%) was higher than that in the control group (12.23%) (P < 0.001). Among 160 subjects with≥2 pregnancies, the proportion of adverse pregnancy history in the case group (57.81%) was higher than that in the control group (17.71%) (P < 0.001). The results of χ² test stratified by pregnancy for different PAH-DNA adducts levels between the two groups showed that the PAH-DNA adducts level was associated with missed abortion in subjects with≥2 pregnancies (χ²=10.14, P=0.017). Being further stratified by adverse pregnancy history, the PAH-DNA adducts level in subjects with no adverse pregnancy history was associated with missed abortion (χ²=9.70, P=0.021). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that adverse pregnancy history (OR=5.88, 95%CI: 2.79−12.39) and PAH-DNA adducts (OR=3.01, 95%CI: 1.22−7.40) increased the risk of missed abortion, but no interaction between them was found. The relative excess risk of interaction (RERI), the attributable percentage of interaction (AP), and the synergy index (SI) and its 95%CI were 0.60 (95%CI: −0.58−1.77), 0.74 (95%CI: −0.83−2.30), and 0.20 (95%CI: 0.01−5.43), respectively. Conclusions Adverse pregnancy history and PAH-DNA adducts in pregnant women may increase the risk of missed abortion. The effect of the interaction between them on the occurrence of missed abortion is not supported by the current study.