1.Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes in Centenarian Patients
Zain A SOBANI ; Kevin TIN ; Steven GUTTMANN ; Anna A ABBASI ; Ira MAYER ; Yuriy TSIRLIN
Clinical Endoscopy 2018;51(1):56-60
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a relatively safe procedure; however, no study has evaluated the safety of PEG tube placement in patients over the age of 100 years. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patient records for patients who underwent PEG tube placement. Thirty patients aged 100 years and older were identified and a random sample of 275 patients was selected for comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 80.6±16.2 years. No procedure-related deaths or major complications were identified; the overall inpatient mortality rate was 7.6%. Minor complications were noted in 4% (n=12) of the patients. Centenarian patients were predominantly female (80% [n=24] vs. 54% [n=147], p=0.006), with a mean age of 100.5±0.9 years. There was no significant difference in procedural success rates (93.3% vs. 97.4%, p=0.222) or inpatient mortality (6.7% [n=2] vs. 7.7% [n=21], p=1.000) between the two groups. However, a higher minor complication rate was noted in the older patients (13.3% [n=4] vs. 2.9% [n=8], p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Success rates, major complications and inpatient mortality associated with PEG tubes in patients aged over 100 years are comparable to those observed in relatively younger patients at our center; however minor complication rates are relatively higher. These findings lead us to believe that PEG tubes may be safely attempted in carefully selected patients in this subset of the population.
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Gastrostomy
;
Humans
;
Inpatients
;
Mortality
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Nonagenarian Patients: Is It Really Safe?.
Zain A SOBANI ; Daria YUNINA ; Anna ABBASI ; Kevin TIN ; Daniel SIMKIN ; Mary ROJAS ; Yuriy TSIRLIN ; Ira MAYER ; Rabin RAHMANI
Clinical Endoscopy 2018;51(4):375-380
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Literature on the safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in elderly patients is divided. Based on this we decided to examine the safety of ERCP in nonagenarian patients. METHODS: A total of 1,389 patients, with a mean age of 63.94±19.62 years, underwent ERCP during the study period. There were 74 patients aged 90 years or older with a mean age of 92.07±1.8. Logistic regression showed that nonagenarian patients had a significantly increased odds of in-patient mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=9.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]=4, 23; p≤0.001). Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥2 was also an independent predictor of in-patient mortality (AOR=2.4; 95% CI=1.2, 5.2; p=0.021). Age ≥90 was not associated with increased adverse events; however emergency procedures (AOR=2.4; 95% CI=1.5, 4; p < 0.001) and CCI ≥2 (AOR=2.6; 95% CI=1.7, 4.0; p < 0.001) were more likely to have adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Age ≥90 and CCI ≥2 are independently associated with increased odds of in-patient mortality in patients undergoing ERCP, whereas emergency procedures and CCI ≥2 are associated with an increased adverse event rate. Caution must be exercised when considering ERCP in patients aged ≥90 years and those with a CCI ≥2.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over*
;
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde*
;
Comorbidity
;
Emergencies
;
Humans
;
Logistic Models
;
Mortality
;
Odds Ratio
3.Pregnancy outcomes after all modes of conception in patients with genital tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Dian TJAHJADI ; Jenifer Kiem AVIANI ; Kevin Dominique TJANDRAPRAWIRA ; Ida PARWATI ; Wiryawan PERMADI ; Tono DJUWANTONO ; Tin Chiu LI
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(2):109-130
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the pregnancy outcomes of women diagnosed with genital tuberculosis (GTB) who spontaneously conceived or underwent intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) after being treated with antitubercular therapy (ATT). Publications from the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from December 20, 2021 to March 5, 2022. The outcomes are presented as pooled averages with 95% confidence intervals. The inconsistency index (I2) test was used to measure the heterogeneity between studies. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADEPro (https://www.gradepro.org/). Of the numerous articles identified, 33 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Generally, there was a significant increase in pregnancy rates among patients who underwent IVF compared with those who underwent ATT (37.9% vs. 23.8%; p=0.02). Conversely, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between patients who underwent IUI and those who conceived spontaneously (18.1% vs. 23.8%; p=0.65). In cases in which no abnormalities were found on hysterosalpingography or hysterolaparoscopy, pregnancy rates were comparable between spontaneous and IVF conceptions (48.4% vs. 49.2%). There were no significant differences in pregnancy or live birth rates between patients with GTB and those with other infertility factors undergoing IVF treatment (p>0.05). ATT, which is administered during the early stages of GTB is effective in achieving pregnancy outcomes comparable to IVF. However, in patients with advanced-stage disease, IVF is a superior treatment modality, resulting in increased pregnancy rates.
4.Pregnancy outcomes after all modes of conception in patients with genital tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Dian TJAHJADI ; Jenifer Kiem AVIANI ; Kevin Dominique TJANDRAPRAWIRA ; Ida PARWATI ; Wiryawan PERMADI ; Tono DJUWANTONO ; Tin Chiu LI
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(2):109-130
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the pregnancy outcomes of women diagnosed with genital tuberculosis (GTB) who spontaneously conceived or underwent intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) after being treated with antitubercular therapy (ATT). Publications from the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from December 20, 2021 to March 5, 2022. The outcomes are presented as pooled averages with 95% confidence intervals. The inconsistency index (I2) test was used to measure the heterogeneity between studies. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADEPro (https://www.gradepro.org/). Of the numerous articles identified, 33 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Generally, there was a significant increase in pregnancy rates among patients who underwent IVF compared with those who underwent ATT (37.9% vs. 23.8%; p=0.02). Conversely, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between patients who underwent IUI and those who conceived spontaneously (18.1% vs. 23.8%; p=0.65). In cases in which no abnormalities were found on hysterosalpingography or hysterolaparoscopy, pregnancy rates were comparable between spontaneous and IVF conceptions (48.4% vs. 49.2%). There were no significant differences in pregnancy or live birth rates between patients with GTB and those with other infertility factors undergoing IVF treatment (p>0.05). ATT, which is administered during the early stages of GTB is effective in achieving pregnancy outcomes comparable to IVF. However, in patients with advanced-stage disease, IVF is a superior treatment modality, resulting in increased pregnancy rates.
5.Pregnancy outcomes after all modes of conception in patients with genital tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Dian TJAHJADI ; Jenifer Kiem AVIANI ; Kevin Dominique TJANDRAPRAWIRA ; Ida PARWATI ; Wiryawan PERMADI ; Tono DJUWANTONO ; Tin Chiu LI
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(2):109-130
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the pregnancy outcomes of women diagnosed with genital tuberculosis (GTB) who spontaneously conceived or underwent intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) after being treated with antitubercular therapy (ATT). Publications from the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from December 20, 2021 to March 5, 2022. The outcomes are presented as pooled averages with 95% confidence intervals. The inconsistency index (I2) test was used to measure the heterogeneity between studies. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADEPro (https://www.gradepro.org/). Of the numerous articles identified, 33 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Generally, there was a significant increase in pregnancy rates among patients who underwent IVF compared with those who underwent ATT (37.9% vs. 23.8%; p=0.02). Conversely, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between patients who underwent IUI and those who conceived spontaneously (18.1% vs. 23.8%; p=0.65). In cases in which no abnormalities were found on hysterosalpingography or hysterolaparoscopy, pregnancy rates were comparable between spontaneous and IVF conceptions (48.4% vs. 49.2%). There were no significant differences in pregnancy or live birth rates between patients with GTB and those with other infertility factors undergoing IVF treatment (p>0.05). ATT, which is administered during the early stages of GTB is effective in achieving pregnancy outcomes comparable to IVF. However, in patients with advanced-stage disease, IVF is a superior treatment modality, resulting in increased pregnancy rates.
6.Pregnancy outcomes after all modes of conception in patients with genital tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Dian TJAHJADI ; Jenifer Kiem AVIANI ; Kevin Dominique TJANDRAPRAWIRA ; Ida PARWATI ; Wiryawan PERMADI ; Tono DJUWANTONO ; Tin Chiu LI
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(2):109-130
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the pregnancy outcomes of women diagnosed with genital tuberculosis (GTB) who spontaneously conceived or underwent intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) after being treated with antitubercular therapy (ATT). Publications from the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from December 20, 2021 to March 5, 2022. The outcomes are presented as pooled averages with 95% confidence intervals. The inconsistency index (I2) test was used to measure the heterogeneity between studies. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADEPro (https://www.gradepro.org/). Of the numerous articles identified, 33 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Generally, there was a significant increase in pregnancy rates among patients who underwent IVF compared with those who underwent ATT (37.9% vs. 23.8%; p=0.02). Conversely, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between patients who underwent IUI and those who conceived spontaneously (18.1% vs. 23.8%; p=0.65). In cases in which no abnormalities were found on hysterosalpingography or hysterolaparoscopy, pregnancy rates were comparable between spontaneous and IVF conceptions (48.4% vs. 49.2%). There were no significant differences in pregnancy or live birth rates between patients with GTB and those with other infertility factors undergoing IVF treatment (p>0.05). ATT, which is administered during the early stages of GTB is effective in achieving pregnancy outcomes comparable to IVF. However, in patients with advanced-stage disease, IVF is a superior treatment modality, resulting in increased pregnancy rates.
7.Pregnancy outcomes after all modes of conception in patients with genital tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Dian TJAHJADI ; Jenifer Kiem AVIANI ; Kevin Dominique TJANDRAPRAWIRA ; Ida PARWATI ; Wiryawan PERMADI ; Tono DJUWANTONO ; Tin Chiu LI
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2025;68(2):109-130
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the pregnancy outcomes of women diagnosed with genital tuberculosis (GTB) who spontaneously conceived or underwent intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) after being treated with antitubercular therapy (ATT). Publications from the PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from December 20, 2021 to March 5, 2022. The outcomes are presented as pooled averages with 95% confidence intervals. The inconsistency index (I2) test was used to measure the heterogeneity between studies. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADEPro (https://www.gradepro.org/). Of the numerous articles identified, 33 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. Generally, there was a significant increase in pregnancy rates among patients who underwent IVF compared with those who underwent ATT (37.9% vs. 23.8%; p=0.02). Conversely, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rates between patients who underwent IUI and those who conceived spontaneously (18.1% vs. 23.8%; p=0.65). In cases in which no abnormalities were found on hysterosalpingography or hysterolaparoscopy, pregnancy rates were comparable between spontaneous and IVF conceptions (48.4% vs. 49.2%). There were no significant differences in pregnancy or live birth rates between patients with GTB and those with other infertility factors undergoing IVF treatment (p>0.05). ATT, which is administered during the early stages of GTB is effective in achieving pregnancy outcomes comparable to IVF. However, in patients with advanced-stage disease, IVF is a superior treatment modality, resulting in increased pregnancy rates.